Western States Petroleum Association Spent $8.9M Lobbying Against Climate and Fracking Efforts in California Last Year

authordefault
on

This is a guest post by Dan Bacher.

The oil industry continued its long reign as the top spender on lobbying in California in 2014, according to data just released by the California Secretary of State.

The Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA) led the list with $8.9 million spent on lobbying in 2014, nearly double what it spent in the previous year. WSPA spent $4.67 million in 2013.

WSPA apparently spent much of its money on stopping a fracking moratorium bill in the Legislature and trying to undermine Californiaโ€™s law to lower greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Catherine Reheis-Boyd, President of WSPA and the former Chair of the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative Blue Ribbon Task Force to create questionable โ€œmarine protected areasโ€ in Southern California, also successfully opposed legislation by Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson to protect the Vandenberg State Marine Reserve and the Tranquillon Ridge from offshore oil drilling plans.

โ€œThe winners of the 2014 lobbying competition are in โ€“ and the winner isโ€ฆ BIG OIL!โ€™โ€ said Stop Fooling California, an online and social media public education and awareness campaign that highlights oil companiesโ€™ efforts to mislead and confuse Californians. โ€œCongratulations, Western States Petroleum Association and Chevron! No one has spent more on evil in California than you!โ€

The association spent a total of $4,009,178 lobbying state officials in the third quarter of 2014, a new quarterly record by WSPA shows.

During that quarter, the association paid $375,800 to KP Public Affairs, a prominent Sacramento lobbying and public relations firm that represents clients in health care, aerospace manufacturing and other industries. WSPA also paid $77,576 to Pillsbury Winthrup Shaw Pittman LLP.

WSPA spent $1,456,785 in the first quarter, $1,725,180 in the second quarter and $1,692,391 in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Along with KP Public Affairs and Pillsbury Winthrup Shaw Pittman LLP, the association hired two other firms, California Resource Strategies and Alcantar & Kahl, to lobby for Big Oil.

The Sacramento Bee pointed out that the โ€œvast majority of the petroleum associationโ€™s spending on lobbying last year โ€“ about $7.2 million โ€“ was reported under a catch-all ‘other’ category that requires no detailed disclosure showing who benefited or how the money was spent.โ€ย 

The San Ramon-based Chevron and its subsidiaries placed third on the list with $4,282,216 spent on lobbying in 2014, including $2,198,209 paid in the fourth quarter.

The California State Council of Service Employees placed second with $5.9 million, while the California Chamber of Commerce finished fourth on the list with $3.9 million and the California Hospital Association and California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems finished fifth with $3 million

The oil industry has spent over $70 million on lobbyists in California since January 2009, according to a 2014 report written by Will Barrett, the Senior Policy Analyst for the American Lung Association in California.

The Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA) topped the oil industry spending with a total of $31,179,039 spent on lobbying since January 1, 2009 at the time of Barrettโ€™s report. Chevron was second in lobbying expenses with a total of $15,542,565 spent during the same period.

Fromย July 1ย toย September 30ย alone, the oil industry spent an unprecedented $7.1 million lobbying elected officials in California โ€œwith a major focus on getting oil companies out of a major clean air regulation,โ€ said Barrett.

Big Oil also exerts its power and influence by spending many millions of dollars every election season on candidates and ballot measures. For example, the oil industry dumped $7.6 million into defeating a measure calling for a fracking ban in Santa Barbara County and nearly $2 million into an unsuccessful campaign to defeat a measure banning fracking and other extreme oil extraction techniques in San Benito County during the November 2014 election. Chevron also spent $3 million (unsuccessfully) to elect โ€œtheirโ€ candidates to the Richmond City Council.

Not only does Big Oil spend millions every year on lobbying and campaign contributions, but it funds โ€œAstroturfโ€ campaigns to eviscerate environmental laws. Leaked documents provided to Northwest Public Radio, Business Week and other media outlets last year exposed a campaign by the Western States Petroleum Association to fund and coordinate a network of โ€œAstroturfโ€ groups to oppose environmental laws and local campaigns against fracking in California, Washington and Oregon.

This network was revealed in a WSPA PowerPoint presentation from aย Nov. 11ย presentation to the Washington Research Council, given by Catherine Reheis-Boyd, WSPA President.ย 

โ€œThe Powerpoint deck details a plan to throttle AB 32 (also known as the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) and steps to thwart low carbon fuel standards (known as LCFS) in California, Oregon, and Washington State,โ€ revealed Stop Fooling California.

Oil and chemical industry representatives also further exert their power and influence by serving on state and federal regulatory panels. In one of the most overt conflicts of interest in recent California history, WSPA President Catherine Reheis-Boyd served as the Chair of the Marine Life Protection Act Blue Ribbon Task Force to create fake โ€œmarine protected areasโ€ in Southern California.

She also served on the task forces for the Central Coast, North Central Coast and North Coast, in addition to sitting on a NOAA federal marine protected areas panel from 2003 to 2014.

The so-called โ€œmarine protected areasโ€ created under the MLPA Initiative fail to protect the ocean from fracking, offshore oil drilling, pollution, military testing, corporate aquaculture and all human impacts on the ocean other than fishing and gathering.

Not only did these alleged โ€œYosemites of the Seaโ€ fail to protect the ocean, but they violate the traditional fishing and gathering rights of the Yurok Tribe and other Indian Nations and are based on terminally flawed and incomplete science. In fact, Ron LeValley, the Co-Chair of the MLPA Initiative Science Advisory Team for the North Coast, is currently in federal prison for conspiracy to embezzle $852,000 from the Yurok Tribe.

The millions Chevron and other oil companies have spent on lobbying, campaign contributions and setting up โ€œAstroturfโ€ groups promoting the oil industry agenda are just chump change to Big Oil. The five big oil companies โ€“ BP, Chevron, Conoco-Phillips, Exxon Mobil and Shell โ€“ made a combined total of $93 billion in 2013.

Even with sliding oil prices, the big five oil companies โ€” BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil, and Shell โ€” made $16.4 billion in the last quarter of 2014 and $89.7 billion for the entire year, according to the Center for American Progress.ย 
ย 

authordefault

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.