The UVA Emails and Confirmation Bias: Seek and Ye Shall Find

authordefault
on

You have to hand it to the American Tradition Institute. Unlike Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinelli, theyโ€™ve found a way to get the University of Virginia to release at least some emails and other documents from climate researcher Michael Mannโ€™s time working thereโ€“by using freedom of information requests for โ€œpublicโ€ documents. (News here, scathing Washington Post editorial here.)

The University of Virginia is complying, although its president says they will take advantage of every exemption allowed by the law. Still, though, it sounds as though a lot of documents are going to be released. So what will happenย next?

For an answer, we can look to an important new book, Michael Shermerโ€™s The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies, How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths. In it, Shermer discusses the phenomenon of confirmation bias, invoking the biblical line โ€œseek and ye shall findโ€ to describe this pervasive cognitiveย flaw.ย 

The American Tradition Instituteโ€“and indeed, conservative climate skeptics across the boardโ€“have gone seeking scandal among the ranks of climate scientists. Thatโ€™s what Ken Cuccinelli did. Thatโ€™s what happened in โ€œClimateGate.โ€ That has been the strategy for someย time.

So does anyone think that that, whatever these documents say, they are not going to be treated as a scandal by those who went searching for them?

Confirmation bias tells us what will happen. Those who went seeking went in with a theoryโ€“that wrongdoing has been done. They all believe โ€œClimateGate,โ€ shown by multiple investigations to be a fake scandal, was actually a real one. So that is theirย premise.

They will therefore read whatever emails they receive and find wrongdoing in them. They will find politics. They will find closed-mindedness and bias. And who knows what else they will findโ€“but it will all be made to lookย bad.

Will any of the charges be valid? I donโ€™t know, although I seriously doubt it. One thing we can be sure of, though, is that things will be taken out of context and used selectively. Thatโ€™s what happened in โ€œClimateGateโ€ and thatโ€™s what will happenย again.

Conservatives, in short, are targeting Mann and expecting to find another ClimateGate scandal. And I am watching conservatives and also predicting that they will find another ClimateGate โ€œscandal.โ€ Thereโ€™s only the slightest difference between our views: The quotationย marks.

Which one of us do you think is going to beย right?ย 

Related Posts

on

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once said back in 2015, โ€˜the atmosphere doesnโ€™t care where carbon is emitted.โ€™

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once said back in 2015, โ€˜the atmosphere doesnโ€™t care where carbon is emitted.โ€™
on

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.
on

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.
Analysis
on

The flagship summit is at risk of turning into a tool for authoritarian petrostates.

The flagship summit is at risk of turning into a tool for authoritarian petrostates.