Climate activists have found plenty to be angry about at this yearโs UN climate talks, which are scheduled to conclude in Madrid tonight. From youth groups to indigenous people, civil society has been more riled than in previous years, as the disconnect grows between momentum on the streets and the slow progress of theย negotiations.
โItโs like two parallel worlds,โ says Sara Shaw, part of the Friends of the Earth International delegation at the meeting, known as COP25. โItโs so stark, the contrast between climate breakdown, the potential of massive expansion of fossil fuels, using markets to game the system, the access polluters have to these talks when civil society is really marginalised. I think itโs just coming together in a huge amount of frustration at the injustice of itย all.โ
While the UN climate talks have always been an opportunity for activists to express their displeasure โ there were hunger strikes in 2013, for instance, following a typhoon in the Philippines โ civil society groups have been particularly united in their frustration at the process this year, which culminated in activists being forcibly barred from the venue on Wednesday.
Consequences ofย failure
Two issues have proved particularly contentious: the role of carbon markets, and lack of finance for countries that are already suffering the impacts of climate change โ known in the negotiations as โloss andย damageโ.
At the meeting, the US put forward a proposal that would make it more difficult for poor countries to gain compensation for the damages caused by climate change in theย future.
The Paris Agreement already ensures that developed nations cannot be held liable for the damage that has been caused by climate change. Negotiators are seeking further protection by extending this clause across the UNโs climate convention atย large.
Avishek Shrestha of the Asian Peoplesโ Movement on Debt and Development is fully aware of the real-world impacts of such a policy. โPeople back in Nepal are dying each day. People are forced to leave their houses, theyโre losing their jobs, and many small farmers are losing their crops. So loss and damage is a major issue for us. But the rich developed countries are not giving funding,โ heย says.
Like what you’re reading? Support our work by becoming a DeSmog patronย today!
Impacts of Articleย 6
Another contentious issue dividing countries in Madrid is the role carbon markets have to play in combating climateย change.
Known as Article 6, negotiators agreed that carbon markets would form part of the Paris Agreement in 2015. The rulebook guiding how these function in practice being discussed in Madrid has provedย controversial.
Carbon markets have strong support from the business community, including oil and gas companies. But campaigners are concerned about the human rights implications of this approach, as well as the potential for carbon credits to undermine efforts to tackle climateย change.
Shellโs climate change advisor, David Hone, defended the mechanism at an event hosted by the International Emissions Trading Association, a pro-carbon markets lobby, earlier this week saying, โyou get an overall mitigation in global emissions simply by using Article 6. You get investment in countries that wouldnโt otherwise occur โ real additionality โ and you do obtain the overall goal of net-zeroย emissions.โ
But non-governmental organisations have vehemently opposed the mechanism as itย stands.
On Tuesday night, indigenous leaders from across Latin America, the Caribbean and North America delivered a letter to the COP presidency outlining their demands in relation to the climate crisis. This included a demand to โreject the mercantilization of natureโ through carbon markets, which they said were โneocolonialist solutions that bring conflicts within ourย peoples.โ
Friends of the Earthโs Shaw agrees that there are serious social justice concerns about using carbon markets to cut emissions. โNew markets will allow big emitters, polluting countries, to continue to extract fossil fuels and pay for carbon trading schemes that are going to cause huge damage, particularly in the south, where you get plantations, people displaced, and indigenous peoplesโ land lost,โ sheย says.
And campaigners arenโt convinced carbon markets are environmentally effective. โThe negotiations on carbon markets, if they are pushed through, itโs absolutely game over for 1.5C,โ saysย Shaw.ย
Read all of DeSmog’s COP25ย coverage
Urgency
The carbon markets conflict is indicative of how civil society has become more confident and less willing to accept compromises at the COP, according to Collin Rees, a senior campaigner at Oil Changeย International.
โThat combination of increased urgency and a much louder and bolder movement has greatly increased the calls for drastic action. At the same time, weโve seen this process continue to be more or less what itโs always been, which is a band-aid compared to what needs to be done to fix this problem,โ heย says.
โInternational collaboration is a crucial piece of the puzzle and we need to have binding agreements. But we also need more ambition across the board. This process is not adapting to the urgency of theย crisis.โ
Activists werenโt alone in expressing their frustration at the pace of the negotiations. On Thursday, ministers from the small island states convened an emergency press conference in response to the lack of ambition within theย negotiations.
โWe are appalled at the state of negotiations. At this stage we are being cornered. We fear having to concede on too many issues that would damage the very integrity of the Paris Agreement,โ said Carlos Fuller, the lead negotiator for the group, in a statement.
โWhatโs before us is a level of compromise so profound that it underscores a lack of ambition, seriousness about the climate emergency and the urgent need to secure the fate of our islands,โ heย said.
Nonetheless, some participants are convinced there is still everything to play for as COP draws to aย close.
Negotiations may well run into the night, as the ticking clock forces compromises and trade-offs in the interests of averting another very public failure. But with the carbon budget shrinking and climate impacts accelerating, many members of civil society will likely be left thinking that, at this stage, any feasible outcome is a failure. Their anger is driven by a frustration that action, if it happens at all, is likely too little and about 20 years tooย late.ย
Image: Flickr/UNFCCC,ย CC BY–NC–SAย 2.0
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts