Newspaper prescribes "the Swindle" for schoolchildren

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
on

The editorial then finishes off with the absolutist view of science by propping up one scientist, MITโ€™s Richard Lindzen, as proof that the โ€œconsensusโ€ about the human contribution to climate change is not unanimous. Of course, The Province fails to mention the overwhelming agreement in the peer-reviewed scientific literature that global warming is a real and pressing concern; that humans have caused it and humans must fix it. Instead, the editorial writers cling to the public relations efforts and populist (which is to say, NOT peer-reviewed) journalism of people like Lindzen and letter-to-the-editor king Timย Ball.

As for putting the shock-doc The Great Swindle in front of our high-school children, Iโ€™m completely in favour. But letโ€™s first rustle up a brochure outlining the inaccuracies and outright falsehoods contained in the work. The DeSmogBlog could provide background on the oil-inudstry connections of the โ€œskepticalโ€ scientists, starting here.

A fair document might also include some information on the director, Martinย Durkin:

In 1998 the Independent Television Commission found that, when making a similar series, Durkin had โ€œmisledโ€ his interviewees about โ€œthe content and purpose of the programmesโ€. Coincidentally, Carl Wunsch, an MIT professor who appeared in this video, has complained that he was misled on this occasion and is considering legal action. In the words of Dr. Wunsch: The Great Global Warming Swindle, was โ€œgrossly distortedโ€ and โ€œas close to pure propaganda as anything since World Warย Two.โ€

Also in 1998, Durkin submitted a documentary proposal to the BBC making the claim that silicone breast implants were far from harming women, and were in fact beneficial, reducing the risk of breast cancer. The BBC rejected his proposal based on the finding that Durkin had entirely ignored a powerful body of evidence contradicting his claims. So Durkin took the proposal over to Channel 4, and they airedย it.

Durkinโ€™s own researcher, a biochemist, also quit in disgust, saying, โ€œMy research was being ignored. The published research had been construed to give an impression thatโ€™s not the case. I donโ€™t know how that programme got passed. The only consolation for me was that Iโ€™m really glad I didnโ€™t put my name toย it.โ€

In a 1997, Durkin compared environmentalists to Nazis in a Channel 4 series called Against Nature.

In 2000 , Durkin produced another Channel 4 documentary on genetic engineering called Modified Truth. Even before the show was aired one of the interviewees, a geneticist named Dr Mae-Wan Ho stated: โ€œI feel completely betrayed and misled. They did not tell me it was going to be an attack on myย position.โ€

As for Channel 4 itself, itโ€™s good to them returning to their usual programming, including such current classics as โ€œCelebrity Wife Swapโ€ and โ€œWank Week,โ€ an entire week dedicated to masturbation-themedย programmes.

The Province seems to be suggesting that An Inconvenient Truth falls short of presenting the whole truth. But if you want the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, we regret that Martin Durkinโ€™s work will be left in a dark and lonely storeroom – where itย belongs.

ย 

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
Kevin is a contributor and strategic adviser to DeSmog. He runs the digital marketing agency Spake Media House. Named a โ€œGreen Heroโ€ by Rolling Stone Magazine and one of the โ€œTop 50 Tweetersโ€ on climate change and environment issues, Kevin has appeared in major news media outlets around the world for his work on digital campaigning. Kevin has been involved in the public policy arena in both the United States and Canada for more than a decade. For five years he was the managing editor of DeSmogBlog.com. In this role, Kevinโ€™s research into the โ€œclimate denial industryโ€ and the right-wing think tank networks was featured in news media articles around the world. He is most well known for his ground-breaking research into David and Charles Kochโ€™s massive financial investments in the Republican and tea partyย networks. Kevin is the first person to be designated a โ€œCertified Expertโ€ on theย political and community organizing platformย NationBuilder. Prior to DeSmog, Kevin worked in various political and government roles. He was Senior Advisor to the Minister of State for Multiculturalism and a Special Assistant to the Minister of State for Asia Pacific, Foreign Affairs for the Government of Canada. Kevin also worked in various roles in the British Columbia provincial government in the Office of the Premier and the Ministry of Health. In 2008 Kevin co-founded a groundbreaking new online election tool called Vote for Environment which was later nominated for a World Summit Award in recognition of the worldโ€™s best e-Content and innovative ICTย applications. Kevin moved to Washington, DC in 2010 where he worked for two years as the Director of Online Strategy for Greenpeace USA and has since returned to his hometown of Vancouver, Canada.

Related Posts

on

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.
on

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.
on

This story was published in partnership with Gen Dread and a video version will be available online on November 16 as part of the Climate Consciousness Summit 2024, staged by the Pocket Project in...
on

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.