Nature Pens Scathing Editorial On Virginia A.G. Cuccinelli Witch Hunt of Michael Mann

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
on

In a scathing rebuke of Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelliโ€™s witch hunt relating to the work of climatologist Michael Mann, the highly-regarded journal Nature this week published an editorial called โ€œScience subpoenaedโ€ that condemns the latest political attack on a climate scientist and calls into serious question Cuccinelliโ€™s motives.

AG Cuccinelli, a former Republican state Senator, earlier this month launched a ridiculously over-the-top inquiry demanding that the University of Virginia turn over a massive number of documents and personal communications related to Professor Mannโ€™s work and government contracts.ย  Cuccinelli demands to see eleven yearsโ€™ worth of Mannโ€™s emails and other correspondence with climate scientists, and all available documents, computer code and data relating to Mannโ€™s research on five different state and federal grants.

Echoing The Washington Post, which published a similar editorial lambasting Cuccinelliโ€™s โ€œwitch huntโ€ of Professor Mann, the Nature editorial similarly slammed the AG.

Nature notes that โ€œCuccinelli has lost no time in burnishing his credentials with far-right โ€˜Tea Partyโ€™ activists, many of whom hail him as a hero,โ€ and suggests that:
โ€œGiven the lack of any evidence of wrongdoing, itโ€™s hard to see Cuccinelliโ€™s subpoena โ€” and similar threats of legal action against climate scientists in a February report by climate-change denier Senator James Inhofe (Republican, Oklahoma) โ€” as anything more than an idealogically motivated inquisition that harasses and intimidates climate scientists.โ€

Not surprisingly, climate deniers are cheering on Cuccinelliโ€™s effort, including the paid tobacco shill turned chemical industry apologist turned climate denier Steven โ€œJunkmanโ€ Milloy.

Milloy penned a recent piece in the Washington Times saluting Cuccinelliโ€™s witch hunt, a piece which he says on his website is โ€œdedicated to those skeptics and libertarians who, confused about Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelliโ€™s investigation of Michael Mann, are aiding and abetting the enemy.โ€

Apparently Milloy is annoyed that fellow skeptics at ClimateChangeFraud.com didnโ€™t fall in line to cheer Cuccinelliโ€™s effort, and instead raised questions about the appropriateness of the AGโ€™s focus on Michael Mann, noting that the โ€œWashington Post has properly branded Cuccinelliโ€™s ploy as a witch hunt.โ€

Nature also mentions the fact that โ€œeven several climate sceptics who count themselves among Mannโ€™s fiercest critics have publicly condemned the attorney generalโ€™s move.โ€

The Nature editorial concludes:
โ€œScientific organizations must respond quickly and forcefully any time political machinations threaten to undercut academic freedom. And, rather than complying, the University of Virginia should explore every avenue to challenge the subpoena.โ€

The Nature piece is highly recommended reading, as is the earlier Washington Post editorial, which stated:
โ€œWE KNEW Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II (R) had declared war on reality. Now he has declared war on the freedom of academic inquiry as well. We hope that Gov. Robert F. McDonnell (R) and the University of Virginia have the spine to repudiate Mr. Cuccinelliโ€™s abuse of the legal code. If they do not, the quality of Virginiaโ€™s universities will suffer for years to come. In his ongoing campaign to wish away human-induced climate change, Mr. Cuccinelli has targeted Michael Mannโ€ฆโ€

The Washington Postโ€™s editorial about the attack on Mann notes that, โ€œMr. Cuccinelli demonstrates a dangerous disregard for scientific method and academic freedom,โ€ and concludes that โ€œ[Virginia Gov. Robert F.] McDonnell should condemn the attorney general and aid the university, making it clear that Mr. Cuccinelli speaks only for himself.โ€

It wasnโ€™t the first time the Post had slammed Cuccinelli either.ย  In an October 2009 editorial titled โ€œMr. Cuccinelliโ€™s Bigotry,โ€ the Post Eds wrote that โ€œgiven his bizarre ideas, he would very likely become an embarrassment for the commonwealth.โ€

It appears the Post was too generous with their conservative โ€œvery likelyโ€ qualifier, as Cuccinelli has proven on multiple occasions thus far in his short term to be a colossal embarrassment.ย 

Bravo to Nature for calling Cuccinelli out asย well.

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a freelance writer and researcher specializing in media, politics, climate change and energy. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, Grist, The Washington Times and other outlets.

Related Posts

Future nature talks must be protected from โ€œintense industry pressureโ€ say campaigners.

Future nature talks must be protected from โ€œintense industry pressureโ€ say campaigners.
on

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once said back in 2015, โ€˜the atmosphere doesnโ€™t care where carbon is emitted.โ€™

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once said back in 2015, โ€˜the atmosphere doesnโ€™t care where carbon is emitted.โ€™
on

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.
on

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.