Monckton Reaches New Heights of Anti-Environmentalism

authordefault
on

CLIMATE science denial think-tank the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow is flying a four-strong delegation to next weekโ€™s UN climate conference in South Africa, with a promise to engage in a โ€œbalanced, civil and genuineโ€ย dialogue.

But the chances of much civility appear to be somewhere between zero and naught, given their delegate Lord Christopher Moncktonโ€™s latest outpouring of bilious, conspiratorial anti-environmentalism.
ย 
During a video chat with The Daily Callerโ€™s Ginni Thomas, Monckton claims environmental groups โ€œhate humanityโ€, that the UN process (which he is flying into at Durban) is to โ€œset-up a world governmentโ€ and throws around claims of fascism and communism like confetti.ย 
ย 
Never a man to understate his case, CFACT delegate Lord Monckton is fast becoming the Harold Camping of the climate science denial industry, claiming the global warming โ€œscareโ€ is an attempt to โ€œshut down the Westโ€, โ€œstamp out democracyโ€ and establish โ€œa tyranny over the mind of manโ€.
ย 

The cleanest form of energy on the planet? Monckton tells host Ginni Thomas, itโ€™s โ€œcoalโ€.
The fact is that if we allow our fossil fuels to be interfered with or priced out of the market, so as to subside futile, bird-killing, bat-slicing windmills, or these ridiculous solar panels, then all we do is cut of our nose to spite our face
Now the trouble with this is, that itโ€™s actually fossil fuels that are receiving the bulk of subsidies. According to that famous left-wing environmental organisation, the International Energy Agency, fossil fuel industries received $409 billion in 2010 (up from $300 billion in 2009).
ย 
Monckton tells Thomas that he โ€œlikes to speak for freedomโ€. ย Actually, Monckton also likes to threaten to sue people who disagree with him, which isnโ€™t quite speaking for freedom.
ย 
Monckton has issued threats to sue Guardian columnist George Monbiot, scientist professors Scott Mandia and John Abraham and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. He also went to the UKโ€™s High Court in an unsuccessful bid to have his own response inserted at the end of a BBC-commissioned documentary Meet the Climate Skeptics.
ย 
Lord Monckton also attacks plans being discussed in the state of Maryland for a more sustainable future. If implemented in full, Monckton says the plan will take the state โ€œback to the stone-age but without even the right to light a carbon emitting fire in your cave.โ€

Alarmist, anyone?

ย 
Actually, caves as housing options arenโ€™t mentioned in Marylandโ€™s plan, but it does talk of the utter evils of a โ€œrange of housing densities, types, and sizesโ€ฆ for citizens of all ages and incomesโ€.
ย 
The plan also states how quality of life can come through โ€œuniversal stewardship of the land, water, and air resulting in sustainable communities and protection of the environmentโ€.
ย 
Elsewhere in Lord Moncktonโ€™s tirade, he says that raising CO2 levels โ€œwould hugely increase yields of crops – the extra carbon dioxide is tree foodโ€. He adds that โ€œif you want to green the planet, then what you want is more carbon dioxide and not lessโ€.
ย 
I asked Associate Professor Ros Gleadow of Monash University and President of the Australian Society of Plant Scientists, about this common meme that CO2 is merely โ€œfood for plantsโ€ and that increasing it would just raise crop yields.
ย 
She told DeSmogBlog that under enhanced CO2, the nutritional quality and protein levels of most plants decreases. This could affect plants such as wheat, where protein levels are vital in bread making. Because protein levels would fall, this reduction could also affect the ability of humans to tolerate cyanide, which gets released when foods such as cassava โ€“ a staple in Africa – are eaten.
ย 
She added because plants grown in higher CO2 regimes need fewer leaves to grow, this would also impact on animals which ate those leaves.
ย 
For Australia, this means koalas. Just before Lord Monckton came to the land of koalas for a mining-industry sponsored tour earlier this year, he compared the countryโ€™s former climate policy adviser Professor Ross Garnaut to a Nazi and used a picture of a large swastika next to a quote from Professor Garnaut to ram his point home.
ย 
On arriving in Australia, Monckton issued an apology โ€“ of sorts โ€“ saying he had been โ€œcatastrophically stupid and offensiveโ€ and that he had written to Professor Garnaut to withdraw the comment โ€œunreservedlyโ€.
ย 
But in his interview with Ginni Thomas, Monckton now claims his previously โ€œcatastrophically stupidโ€ statement was actually โ€œvery mildโ€.
ย 
You donโ€™t actually hear Ginni Thomas at all during the interview, so at no point does she even attempt to restrain or challenge his stataments.
ย 
But perhaps the most conspiratorial part of the interview, comes when Monckton claims that Google had been paid โ€œsomething like a quarter of a million dollarsโ€ to publish bogus pages on the internet in order to push a video of him down the search engineโ€™s page ranking. Without this intervention, Monckton claim modestly the video would have โ€œgone to 20 millionโ€ and been โ€œunstoppableโ€.
ย 
A Google spokesperson told DeSmogBlog
Google ranks websites to deliver the best possible results for users. We rely on a fundamentally algorithmic approach because this is the most scalable way to answer more than a billion search queries each day. Search rankings are completely unrelated to Googleโ€™s paid advertising services and other partnerships, and there is absolutely no way for a webmaster to pay money to increase search rankings.
According to research by MediaMatters, CFACT has received more than $2million in funding over the years from ExxonMobil and foundationโ€™s chaired by Richard Scaife, the billionaire heir to the Mellon familyโ€™s oil, banking and aluminium businesses.
ย 
In addition, CFACT also received $160,000 in 2010 from the Sarah Scaife Foundation, according to the foundationโ€™sย latest annual report.ย 
ย 
For the record, SSF also gave $250,000 to the George C Marshall Institute, another promoter of climate science misinformation, and $600,000 to the Heritage Foundation, which heavily downplays the need to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and argues against scientific consensus.ย Theย Allegheny Foundation, also chaired by Richard Scaife, gave $1.25 million to Heritage last year.
ย 

Given their funding, CFACT can obviously afford to stick Lord Monckton on a plane to Durban to attend a UN conference. Let’s hope he doesn’t run into any more of those โ€œHitler Youthโ€.

Related Posts

on

The elite agency has been going all out to win positive press for the hosts of the UN climate talks.

The elite agency has been going all out to win positive press for the hosts of the UN climate talks.
on

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.
on

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.
on

Former ExxonMobil climate scientist Lindsey Gulden: "It was after I was fired for reporting a garden variety fraud that I really sat back and thought about the implications for climate change."

Former ExxonMobil climate scientist Lindsey Gulden: "It was after I was fired for reporting a garden variety fraud that I really sat back and thought about the implications for climate change."