Microsoft Fail: Computer company criticizes Heartland but won't withhold future support

authordefault
on

Microsoft is finally taking a clearer position denouncing the Heartland Institute’s irresponsible position on climate science, but the computer megacorp still won’t shut the door on providing Heartland with free software in theย future.

In the wake of Heartland’s highly offensive advertising campaign, in which Heartland said, flatly, โ€œthe most prominent advocates of global warming aren’t scientists; they are murderers, tyrants and madmen,โ€ Microsoft”s Director of Corporate Citizenship Steve Lippman distanced his company from the Heartlandย position:

โ€œThe Heartland Institute does not speak for Microsoft on climate change. In fact, the Heartland Instituteโ€™s position on climate change is diametrically opposed to Microsoftโ€™s position. And we completely disagree with the groupโ€™s inflammatory and distasteful advertisingย campaign.โ€

But he went on with this unconvincingย dodge:

โ€œHeartland did participate in our global software donation program in 2010, as did thousands of other nonprofit organizations.ย  Itโ€™s important to point out that hundreds of environmental and conservation groups also took advantage of the same program, and received over $13 million in free software to pursue theirย missions.โ€

And Lippman concludesย with:

โ€œAgain, our software donation program does not support or endorse any particular nonprofit or any particular policy views – it supports giving all nonprofits in the world access to freeย software.โ€

So, by that comment, Microsoft intends to take no responsibility for its past support and to promise no judgment whatever in extending future in-kind funding or gifts. Microsoft’s only standard in offering support is that applicants NOT make a profit. (Al Qaeda might want to get their free software request in with the nextย batch.)

What’s called for here is a simple statement saying that Microsoft will not give Heartland free goods, services or cash in the future. Anything less suggests that the company has no real issue with Heartland’s โ€œinflammatory and distasteful advertising campaignโ€ – or any of the other irresponsible and disingenuous programs for which Heartland has becomeย famous.

Related Posts

on

Industry giants have been accused of โ€˜enriching shareholdersโ€™ while โ€˜farmers and consumers pay the priceโ€™.

Industry giants have been accused of โ€˜enriching shareholdersโ€™ while โ€˜farmers and consumers pay the priceโ€™.
on

Nigel Farageโ€™s anti-climate party has received two thirds of its income from oil investors.

Nigel Farageโ€™s anti-climate party has received two thirds of its income from oil investors.
on

You might not have heard of them, but a new analysis shows these ad execs have overseen $1.5 billion worth of fossil fuel ads in the U.S. since the Paris Agreement.

You might not have heard of them, but a new analysis shows these ad execs have overseen $1.5 billion worth of fossil fuel ads in the U.S. since the Paris Agreement.
on

DeSmog analysis reveals London-based WPP linked to twiceย as much oil advertising as American rivalsย despite its internal climate policy.

DeSmog analysis reveals London-based WPP linked to twiceย as much oil advertising as American rivalsย despite its internal climate policy.