Jeffrey R. Holmstead

Jeffrey R. Holmstead

Credentials

Background

Jeffrey R. Holmstead is a partner and attorney for Bracewell LLP in Washington, DC (formerly Bracewell & Giuliani*) where he has headed their โ€œEnvironmental Strategies Group (ESG)โ€ since 2006. The ESG reportedly works to โ€œadvise and defend companies and business groups confronting major environmental and energy-development challenges, both domestically and globally.โ€ Holmstead previously served as Associate Counsel to President George H.W. Bush from 1989 to 1993, where he was โ€œdeeply involvedโ€ in the passage and amendments to the Clean Air Act. Holmstead’s work with the Clean Air Act earned him the title of โ€œClean Air Villain of the Monthโ€ by the Clean Air Trust.3โ€œJeffrey R. Holmstead: Partner,โ€ Bracewell LLP. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkUYqtr6 4โ€œClean Air Villain of the Month,โ€ Clean Air Trust, March, 2002. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkdfbNnR

Holmstead then moved to the corporate law firm Lantham & Watkins until 2001, another law firm representing industry interests and combatting regulations on mercury pollution from coal & oil power plants.5โ€œThe Pollutersโ€™ Lawyers,โ€ DC Bureau, November 3, 2011. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkgoXRdl 6โ€œJeffrey R. Holmstead: Partner,โ€ Bracewell LLP. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkUYqtr6 7โ€œJeff Holmstead Testimony on EPA’s Carbon Plan,โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, July 29, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkcDW6qu

From 2001 to 2005, Holmstead served as the EPA’s Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation under the Bush administration, a position that Polluterwatch reports Holmstead used to stall mercury pollution controls in US power plants for over eight years.8Connor Gibson. โ€œJeffrey Holmstead: the Coal Industry’s Mercury Lobbyist (Report),โ€ Polluterwatch, December 21, 2011. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkYF9C5U

Holmstead’s appointment at the EPA was controversial and protested by US Senators due to his previous lobbying work for coal companies. Jeffrey Holmstead has been described as a prime example of a โ€œrevolving door lobbyistโ€œโ€”a term that OpenSecrets defines as โ€œa revolving door that shuffles former federal employees into jobs as lobbyists, consultants and strategists just as the door pulls former hired guns into government careers.โ€9Connor Gibson. โ€œCoal Lobbyist Jeff Holmstead Disqualified by Federal Judge in Ameren Pollution Lawsuit,โ€ PolluterWatch. Republished by DeSmog, September 12, 2014. 10Josh Harkinson. โ€œRevolving Door: Climate Edition,โ€ Mother Jones, December 14, 2009. 11โ€œRevolving Door,โ€ OpenSecrets.org. Accessed May 24, 2016.

In 2017, according to Axios, President Trump initially considered Jeffrey Holmstead for a number two position at the EPA. In April 2018, Andrew Wheeler was instead confirmed to serve as Deputy EPA Administer. Wheeler went on to work as Acting Administrator with Scott Pruitt‘s departure.12โ€œScoop: Jeff Holmstead expected to be #2 at EPA,โ€ Axios, June 19, 2017. Archived July 12, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/epx76 13Connor Gibson. โ€œTrump To Tap Jeff Holmstead for EPA? Swamp Alert!โ€ DeSmog, June 22, 2017. 14(Press Release). โ€œU.S. Senate Confirms Andrew Wheeler to Serve as Deputy EPA Administrator,โ€ EPA, April 12, 2018. Archived January 14, 2019. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/lBgiT

While Holmstead has also been described as โ€œone of the nation’s leading climate change lawyers,โ€ he has lobbied extensively for the coal and energy industries with clients including Duke Energy, Southern Company, โ€‹Ameren, Arch Coal, Progress Energy, DTE Energy, Salt River Project, and others. Holmstead was also an adjunct scholar with the Citizens for the Environment, a group created by Koch Industries’ now-defunct Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE).15โ€œJeffrey R. Holmstead: Partner,โ€ Bracewell LLP. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkUYqtr6 16โ€œHolmstead, Jeffrey,โ€ Profile at OpenSecrets.org. Accessed May 24, 2016. 17โ€œThe Pollutersโ€™ Lawyers,โ€ DC Bureau, November 3, 2011. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkgoXRdl

*Bracewell LLP was renamed in 2016 after the departure of its founder, former New York City mayor Rudy Giulani.18Sara Randazzo. โ€œBracewell & Giuliani is Losing โ€ฆ Giuliani,โ€ The Wall Street Journal, January 19, 2016. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkZY6g7m

Electric Reliability Coordinating Council (ERCC)

Jeffrey Holmstead is counsel to the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council (ERCC), a group that describes itself as โ€œa broad-based coalition of energy companies committed to the continued viability of diverse, affordable and reliable electric power supply in the United States.โ€ Members of the ERCC โ€œinclude some of the major electric utilities companies in the country who all possess the shared belief that coal-based energy should play an important role as our nation moves toward a clean energy future.โ€ The ERCC’s director, Scott Segal, is also a partner at Bracewell LLP.19โ€œStatement from ERCC Counsel Jeff Holmstead on the EPA’s GHG Tailoring Rule,โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Counsel, May 13, 2010. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hklGztFQ 20โ€œWhat is ERCC?โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Council. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkje4lRz 21โ€œStatement from ERCC Director Scott H. Segal at a Public Hearing on National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units,โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, May 24, 2011. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkbtNv7i 22โ€œScott H. Segal: Partner,โ€ Bracewell LLP. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkbZ703j

Latham & Watkins LLP

Latham & Watkins worked along with Holmstead to weaken legislation to reduce mercury pollution from coal and oil power plants. According to DC Bureau, Latham & Watkins’s โ€œattorneys outlined an anemic cap-and-trade system to address mercury pollution from coal and oil fired plants. The firmโ€™s recommendations were written to behoove industry clients.โ€23โ€œThe Pollutersโ€™ Lawyers,โ€ DC Bureau, November 3, 2011. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkgoXRdl

โ€œA side-by-side comparison of one of the three proposed rules and the memorandums prepared by Latham & Watkins โ€“ one of Washington’s premier corporate environmental law firms โ€“ shows that at least a dozen paragraphs were lifted, sometimes verbatim, from the industry suggestions,โ€ The Washington Post reported.24Eric Pianin. โ€œProposed Mercury Rules Bear Industry Mark,โ€ The Washington Post, January 31, 2004. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

Holmstead, while working as associate administrator of the EPAโ€™s Office of Air and Radiation, was responsible for drafting the mercury rule and used language from the Latham & Watkins memo. Prior to working in the Bush administration, Holmstead worked with Latham & Watkins to represent groups like the Alliance for Constructive Air Policy, a utility front group that focused on state smog standards.25โ€œThe Pollutersโ€™ Lawyers,โ€ DC Bureau, November 3, 2011. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkgoXRdl

Stance on Climate Change

โ€œI’m not sure the big debates are around the science, the big debates are around well, what is it that we should doโ€ฆ It’s really a technology issue, and I think the only effective way to deal with climate change is to make sure we’re investing in technologies that will give people what we get today from fossil fuels at a cost that’s cost competitive.

If I were in charge of climate change policy in the government, I would certainly want to invest more in those kinds of technology breakthroughs. And we’re seeing some encouraging things, but I thinkโ€ฆ if this is only about making people’s energy more expensive, making it harder for people to have the things that they have today with fossil fuels, I think it’s very hard to overcome human nature. But if there are technologies that can actually give us those same things without those CO2 issues and at a comparable cost, I think that’s the only way we actually end up dealing with climate change.โ€26Darren Samuelsohn. โ€œInside the fight against Obama’s climate plan,โ€ Politico, July 7, 2015. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkteJ48L

On Mercury

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), some of Jeffrey Holmstead’s statements on the toxicity of mercurcy during his time at the EPA directly contradict statements he made while working for Bracewell & Giuliani:27John Walke. โ€œDesperate Denial: Utility Pollution Apologists Deny Harms From Air Pollution or Health Benefits From Cleaning It Up,โ€ Natural Resources Defense Council, June 14, 2011. Archived May 25, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkq83yEx

Statements by Holmstead of EPA when Holmstead headed EPA program (2001-2005)

โ€œReducing power plantsโ€™ air pollution would result in ‘14,100 fewer premature deaths,’ among other ‘significant health benefits,’ ‘by dramatically reducing fine particle pollution caused by SO2 and NOx emissions.’

โ€œEPA estimates that reducing power plantsโ€™ SO2 and NOx emissions by approximately 60% will deliver ‘particulate matter-related annual benefits’ that include 13,000-17,000 fewer premature fatalities every year. โ€œ

Statements by Holmstead while at Bracewell & Giuliani (2011)

โ€œI don’t believe that there are thousands of people who are dying because of exposure to these small [particles],โ€ i.e. particulate matter.

โ€œIt is pretty hard to say that [mercury from coal-fired power plants] is a significant public health issue.โ€

Key Quotes

January 10, 2019

Holmstead was quoted in a Roll Call article, noting that the government shutdown and doubts that President Trump would win re-election were worrying his industry clients that their deregulatory agenda may be delayed or not carried through in time.28โ€œShutdown ties up Trumpโ€™s fossil fuel agenda,โ€ Roll Call, January 10, 2019. Archived January 14, 2019. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/rmuyS

โ€œI donโ€™t think agencies are necessarily going to be able to pick up where they left off,โ€ said Jeff Holmstead. โ€œItโ€™s now gone on long enough that there are certainly starting to be concerns by industry.โ€

โ€œThere are some people who really support the regulatory reforms and are concerned that the administration is already behind on some things. The longer it drags on, the more challenging it will become. Thereโ€™s no doubt that keeping the government shut down for too much longer certainly puts at risk some of the things that theyโ€™re trying to do.โ€

February 2016

โ€œI think the likelihood that [the EPA rules] will ever go into effect is pretty low,โ€ Holmstead says. โ€œThere needs to be some sort of congressional action to decide how the United States is going to deal with climate change.”29Jeff Tollefson. โ€œUS Supreme Court puts Obama climate regulations on hold,โ€ Nature, February 10, 2016. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hks9Fikj

โ€œUntil the Clean Power Plan, the federal government has never said that states must shut down certain types of plants and build others to replace them. States like Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and South Dakota believe that EPA has gone well beyond its statutory authority in ordering the construction of new wind and solar plants. Even if EPA is, to some extent, requiring them to do things they are doing anyway, they simply donโ€™t believe that EPA has this authority.โ€30Chris Mooney. โ€œThese states are setting wind energy records โ€“ and suing over Obamaโ€™s climate plans,โ€ The Washington Post, February 25, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hksdnjHR

November 11, 2011

โ€œThe answer isn’t just to regulate our way to clean energy.โ€ โ€” Politico Energy Forum (video below).31โ€œCoal Lobbyist Jeff Holmstead Challenged for Protecting Polluters,โ€ YouTube Video uploaded by user PolluterWatch, November 5, 2012.

June 7, 2011

โ€œThe benefits of reducing mercury are very insignificant.โ€ โ€” Video Below:32โ€œResolved: EPA Utility MACT is the right tool at the right time,โ€Environmental Law Institute, June 7, 2011. (Time 25:58). Retrieved from Vimeo.

2006

With regards to his move from a government regulator, to a lobbyist for those he was regulating:

โ€œI, I’m not sure why, uh, people have tried to make something of that. But people have to have jobs. And that’s the way it works.โ€33โ€œEx-Bush air man, now with Giuliani law firm, claims credit for Bush global warming stance,โ€ Clean Air Watch, December 2, 2006. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkpea0Rf

Lobbying

Since joining Bracewell LLP in 2007, Holmstead’s clients have included almost exclusively coal and energy companies including:34โ€œJeffrey Holmstead,โ€ Polluterwatch. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkWFVbsy 35โ€œHolmstead, Jeffrey,โ€ Profile at OpenSecrets.org. Accessed May 24, 2016.

Former Clients

Grand Total โ€” $22,611,500

Other Clients

Key Deeds

February 2016

Jeffrey Holmstead is representing clients suing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over a rule aiming for utilities to shift away from coal-fired power plants and move towards renewable energy sources, The Wall Street Journal reports.37Brent Kendall and Amy Harder. โ€œSupreme Court Puts EPA Carbon Rule on Hold During Litigation,โ€ The Wall Street Journal, February 9, 2016.

July 7, 2015

Politico interviewed Jeffrey Holmstead about why the industry expects the Clean Power Plan to be overturned. Some excerpts below:

โ€œI find it very hard to believe that the courts will ultimately uphold the rule, unless it changes a lot. We’ve only seen the proposal, but I think if you โ€ฆhad to choose one way to oppose the rule, you would say you’d do it in court, because it really is hard to see how the courts would uphold this.โ€

[โ€ฆ] I’ve spent the last 25 years working on Clean Air Act issues and I can say with some confidence that the act doesn’t work very well, if the goal is to get a level of environmental protection at the lowest possible cost. We’re paying a lot more than we need to for the reductions that we’re getting because there’s so much underbrush here. People are starting to talk about another round of Clean Air Act reauthorization.โ€38Darren Samuelsohn. โ€œInside the fight against Obama’s climate plan,โ€ Politico, July 7, 2015. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkteJ48L

September 11, 2014

Jeffrey Holmstead was disqualified by a federal judge in a lawsuit brought by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency against the coal burning utility company Ameren Missouri. The EPA had filed the case in 2011, claiming Ameren violated the Clean Air Act by failing to notify the agency of major modifications to multiple units at the plant.39Jeremy P. Jacobs. โ€œAIR POLLUTION:Judge bars former EPA official from testifying in enforcement suit,โ€ E&E Publishing, September 10, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkdtTC6g

Polluterwatch reports that Judge Rodney Sippel granted U.S. Justice Department’s request to remove Holmstead as a witness, confirming that the lobbyist’s history at U.S. EPA posed โ€œmultiple conflicts of interest.โ€40Connor Gibson. โ€œCoal Lobbyist Jeff Holmstead Disqualified by Federal Judge in Ameren Pollution Lawsuit,โ€ Polluterwatch, September 11, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkeD0pNY 41Patrick Ambrosio. โ€œFormer EPA Official Should Be Disqualified As Expert Witness, Justice Dept. Tells Court,โ€ Bloomberg BNA, July 22, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite Url: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkeMXlAZ

Below is the judge’s motion to dismiss Jeffrey Holmstead, with emphasis added:42โ€œUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMEREN MISSOURI, Defendant,โ€ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00077-RWS. Filed 07/18.14. Retrieved from Bloomberg Law. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

โ€œMr. Holmsteadโ€™s legal opinions are irrelevant, speculative, and inadmissible.โ€ [โ€ฆ] โ€œBy his own description, Mr. Holmsteadโ€™s testimony relies on his recollection of EPA โ€œinternal meetingsโ€ that he says are relevant to the issues to be tried in this action. Such internal communications are privileged and confidential and Mr. Holmstead may not rely on his recollection of them to testify against EPA. Moreover, Mr. Holmstead received other privileged information concerning the issues about which he now seeks to testify on behalf of Ameren, and participated in power-plants enforcement cases related to this one while at EPA. Before he left EPA, he even personally provided a declaration for EPA that is at issue in this and other related power-plants enforcement cases asserting privilege claims on behalf of EPA over documents that are relevant to the opinions he now seeks to offer. Yet he now seeks to change sides and testify against EPA. Moreover, he was assisted in the preparation of his report by another former EPA attorney who was involved in the early stages of the investigation that ultimately led to the filing of this case. For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, Mr. Holmstead should not be allowed to testify in this matter due to his multiple conflicts of interest.43โ€œUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMEREN MISSOURI, Defendant,โ€ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00077-RWS. Filed 07/18.14. Retrieved from Bloomberg Law. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

July 30, 2014

Jeffrey Holmstead testified before before the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology on the EPA’s carbon plan. Holmstead leads his testimony with two stated concerns:44โ€œJeff Holmstead Testimony on EPA’s Carbon Plan,โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, July 29, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkrSlqiV

โ€œ(1) EPAโ€™s proposal goes well beyond its legal authority under the Clean Air Act by trying to force states to regulate anything that produces or uses electricity; and (2) EPA has been so distracted by the notion that it can fundamentally change the electricity system in all 50 states that it has not done the technical work needed to develop legally sound regulations to reduce carbon emissions from existing fossil fuel power plants.โ€45โ€œJeff Holmstead Testimony on EPA’s Carbon Plan,โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, July 29, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkrSlqiV

June 18, 2014

Jeffrey Holmstead was on a panel discussion on the EPA’s Clean Power Plan hosted by the Bipartisan Policy Center.46โ€œDiscussing EPAโ€™s Newly-Released Clean Power Plan,โ€ Bipartisan Policy Center, June 18, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hknuD2Ow

With regards to the Clean Power Rule, Holstead said that โ€œAs someone who believes in the rule of law, I think this clearly goes beyond what EPA is allowed to do under the Clean Air Act.โ€ After the panel discussion, Holmstead was questioned by Greenpeace representatives. Some comments and the full video below:47Connor Gibson. โ€œK Street Confrontation: Greenpeace Questions Coal Lobbyist Jeff Holmstead (VIDEO),โ€ Greenpeace USA. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkp0kKTz

Greenpeace: โ€œAll the technical expertise you have, and the experience you have with the EPA and lawyer, If you recognize the threat and the cost of climate change, why not use these skills in a way to help agencies solve this problem? It seems like every time there is a solution proposed, perhaps for obvious reasonsโ€”if you’re hired by Southern Company or Duke Energy you’re opposing the rulesโ€”but there’s never a solutions to any of thatโ€

Holmstead: โ€œThat’s not true. We propose a lot of solutions, they’re just solutions that you don’t like.โ€48Connor Gibson. โ€œK Street Confrontation: Greenpeace Questions Coal Lobbyist Jeff Holmstead (VIDEO),โ€ Greenpeace USA. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkp0kKTz

June 5, 2014

Jeffrey Holmstead talked at a Resources for the Future seminar titled โ€œMaking Sense of EPAโ€™s Proposed Rule for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Power Plantsโ€ on a panel discussion titled โ€œEPA’s Proposed Rule: Challenges and Opportunities.โ€ 49โ€œMaking Sense of EPAโ€™s Proposed Rule for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Power Plants,โ€ Resources for the Future, June 5, 2014. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hknVKwQ6 Transcript is available for download here.50โ€œMaking Sense of EPAโ€™s Proposed Rule for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Power Plantsโ€ (PDF), Resources for the Future. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

September 2013

OpenSecrets reports that Jeffrey Holmstead was lobbying against GHG restrictions proposed by the EPA, working with Bracewell & Giuliani to represent the interests of major coal producers including Arch Coal, which spent nearly $600,000 lobbying in 2013. Holmstead’s firm also represented Ameren Corp and DTE Energy which spent $634,000 and $860,000 respectively lobbying in 2013, listing clean air regulations and climate controls among their concerns.51Brandon Conradis. โ€œFormer EPA Official Lobbies Against Plan to Curb Greenhouse Gases,โ€ OpenSecrets, September 16, 2013. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkn5jNBS

November 2012

Gabe Elsner of the The Checks and Balances Project confronted Jeffrey Holmstead on why he failed to disclose his ties to the coal industry at an โ€œEnergy and Presidencyโ€ event sponsored by Politico (Video below).52โ€œConfessions of a Coal Lobbyist,โ€ November 16, 2012. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkgGJfdh

The Checks and Balances project also analysed 50 mainstream news stories mentioning Holmstead and found that his ties to the coal industry were only mentioned 36% of the time.

May 13, 2010

Jeff Holmstead released the following statement opposing the EPA’s greenhouse gas โ€œtailoringโ€ rule:53โ€œStatement from ERCC Counsel Jeff Holmstead on the EPA’s GHG Tailoring Rule,โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Counsel, May 13, 2010. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hklGztFQ

โ€œWith this rule, the Administration is trying to use the Clean Air Act to do something it was never intended to do. They’re basically trying to pound a large square peg into a small round hole, and their efforts will have serious legal and economic consequences. The decision to require permits for greenhouse gases means that thousands of construction projects around the country will be blocked or delayed by several years. If the tailoring rule is upheld in court, then the Administration’s temporary construction ban will only stop about 1,600 hundred of the largest projects planned for next year. But if the rule is overturned โ€“ and many lawyers believe it will be โ€“ then EPA itself estimates that the new rules will block or delay construction on more than 80,000 projects that would otherwise be creating jobs all over the country.โ€54โ€œStatement from ERCC Counsel Jeff Holmstead on the EPA’s GHG Tailoring Rule,โ€ Electric Reliability Coordinating Counsel, May 13, 2010. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hklGztFQ

September 2009

Jeffrey Holmstead worked with Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AL) to write a controversial amendment to limit the EPA’s authority to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant.55Glenn Thrush. โ€œLobbyists led meeting on Murkowski EPA amendment,โ€ Politico, January 13, 2010. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkkT17U1

โ€œMurkowski’s proposed amendment to the Clean Air Act has been attacked by Obama administration officials and environmental advocates as an industry-led attempt to hamstring efforts to regulate carbon โ€” the only option available in the absence of a viable Senate climate change bill,โ€ reports Politico.56Glenn Thrush. โ€œLobbyists led meeting on Murkowski EPA amendment,โ€ Politico, January 13, 2010. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkkT17U1

In an interview, Holmstead said of the Murkowski amendment, โ€œI certainly worked with her staffโ€ on the exact phrasing of the measure in September reports The Washington Post.57Juliet Eilperin. โ€œMurkowski and her lobbyist allies,โ€ The Washington Post, January 11, 2010. Archived May 24, 2016.

โ€œI was involved,โ€ he said, adding that Robert J. Martella also helped advise Murkowski’s aides on the matter. โ€œThe line out of the White House and the administration was that the amendment would block the car and truck ruleโ€ setting the first-ever greenhouse gas limits on emissions from vehicles.58Juliet Eilperin. โ€œMurkowski and her lobbyist allies,โ€ The Washington Post, January 11, 2010. Archived May 24, 2016.

DeSmog noted that Senator Murkowski had received $470,000 in campaign contributions from energy and mining industries since 2005, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.59Brendan DeMelle. โ€œMurkowski Amendment To Protect Polluters Was Written By Dirty Polluter Lobbyists,โ€ DeSmog, January 11, 2010. 60โ€œSen. Lisa Murkowski: Top Industries, 2005-2010,โ€ Profile at OpenSecrets. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkqz9j6q

April 2003

Polluterwatch reports that, in his role at the EPA, Holmstead dismantled the EPA-sponsored Utility MACT (maximum achievable control technology) working group which consisted of 20 experts from the utility industry, state and local air quality offices and environmental group which were confident a Utility MACT rule under the Clean Air Act should be implemented to control mercury emissions from power plants. The Utility MACT Working Group was never reconvened under the Bush EPA.61Connor Gibson. โ€œJeffrey Holmstead: the Coal Industry’s Mercury Lobbyist (Report),โ€ Polluterwatch, December 21, 2011. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkYF9C5U

Shortly after the working group was disbanded, the New York Times reported that EPA employees in Holmsteadโ€™s department were told โ€œeither not to analyze or not to release information about mercury, carbon dioxide and other air pollutants,โ€ in order to be consistent with the Bush Administrationโ€™s unscientific political positions.62Jennifer Lee. โ€œCritics Say E.P.A. Won’t Analyze Clean Air Proposals Conflicting With President’s Policies,โ€ The New York Times, July 14, 2003. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

March 2002

The Clean Air Trust named Jeffrey Holmstead the โ€œClean Air Villain if the Monthโ€ for promoting a โ€œdirty-air billโ€ and โ€œ[undermining] enforcement.โ€63โ€œClean Air Villain of the Month,โ€ Clean Air Trust, March, 2002. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkdfbNnR

โ€œWe are extremely reluctant to make this choice, because Holmstead is the federal government’s top politically appointed official charged with regulating air pollution,โ€ said Clean Air Trust executive director Frank O’Donnell. โ€œBut we are hard pressed to find anyone else โ€“ either inside or outside of government โ€“ who appears to be working so hard against pollution cleanup.

โ€œIndeed, when Holmstead recently announced publicly that the President would veto any Clean Air Act amendments unless they gutted the key enforcement program of the law โ€“ new source review โ€“ his designation as ‘villain’ became not only obvious, but essential,โ€ O’Donnell added.

โ€œNow that a federal appeals court has upheld EPA’s national clean air standards for smog and soot, it’s time for EPA officials like Holmstead to enforce the law rather than spend their time trying to weaken or repeal it.โ€64โ€œClean Air Villain of the Month,โ€ Clean Air Trust, March, 2002. Archived May 24, 2016. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6hkdfbNnR

2002

As an assistant administrator at EPA under George W. Bush, Holmstead dismantled technology-based mercury standards moving forward under the Clean Air Act and proposed the โ€œClear Skies Initiative,โ€ which would have allowed โ€œthree times as much mercury as the Clean Air Act.โ€65Bruce Barcott. โ€œChanging All the Rules,โ€ The New York Times Magazine, April 4, 2004. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

Affiliations

Other Resources

Resources

Related Profiles

Jeffrey Bossert Clark Credentials J.D. Georgetown University Law Center (1995)โ€œJeffrey Bossert Clark,โ€ LinkedIn. Accessed October 29, 2018. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. M.A...
Image of Donald Trump by Michael Vadon [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons. Donald Trump Credentials Background Energy ...
Brownstone Institute Background The Brownstone Institute is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization (TIN 87-1368060) that, according to its website, was "created by policy responses to the Covid-...
Image by Gage Skidmore [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons. Rudolph W. Giuliani Credentials J.D., cum laude, New York University School ...