Information Council for the Environment

Information Council for the Environment (ICE)

Background

The now-defunct Information Council for the Environment (ICE) was a program proposed by a coalition of U.S. coal companies including the Western Fuels Association and Southern Company, joined by the Edison Electric Institute.1โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

The goal of the group was to โ€œReposition global warming as theory (not fact),โ€ which it would accomplish through a series of radio and newspaper advertisements. The group would be guided by a โ€œScience Advisory Panelโ€ made up of scientists such as Robert Balling, Patrick Michaels, and Sherwood Idso, who would also contribute with public appearances and newspaper columns for the group, as outlined by the group’s communication plan and documented by Ozone Action.2โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

One of the ads read โ€œWho told you the earth was warming [โ€ฆ] Chicken Little?โ€ and claimed that โ€œevidence that the earth is warming is weak.โ€ It also claimed proof that carbon dioxide was the primary cause for climate change was โ€œnon existent.โ€3โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

According to its communications plan, ICE’s Mission was as follows:4โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

โ€œThe mission of the Informed Citizens for the Environment is to develop and effective national communications program to help ensure that action by the Administration and/or Congress on the issue is based on scientific evidence.โ€5โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

ICE collapsed shortly after internal memoranda for their PR campaign were leaked to the press, after which Patrick Michaels distanced himself from the campaign, saying it contained โ€œblatant dishonesty.6Ross Gelbspan. The Heat Is On: The Climate Crisis, The Cover-up, The Prescription. Dea Capo Press, September 22, 1998.

A 2015 report by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) noted that ICE’s $500,000 advertising campaign โ€œwas designed to disparage climate science and cherry-pick the data to highlight claims of cooling temperatures in order to confuse the public.โ€ UCS also noted that some remained disappointed that the ICE program could not have been continued. For example, Fred Palmer had written that , โ€œit is unfortunate that ICE did not go forwardโ€ since the campaign did provoke a โ€œdramatic turnaround in how people viewed the issue of global warming.โ€7โ€œThe Climate Deception Dossiers (2015),โ€ Union of Concerned Scientists, July 9, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/wC27p

ICE โ€œStrategiesโ€8โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

  1. Reposition global warming as theory (not fact).
  2. Target print and radio media for maximum effectiveness.
  3. Achieve broad participation across the entire electric utility industry
  4. Start small, start well, and build on early successes.
  5. Get the test concepts developed and implemented as soon as possible.
  6. โ€œTest Marketโ€ execution in early 1991.
  7. Build national involvement as soon as โ€œtest marketsโ€ results are in hand โ€” summer 1991.
  8. Go national in the late fall of 1991 with a media program
  9. Use a spokesman from the scientific community.

Potential Program Names/Aliases

According to a report by Ozone Action, the initial plan for ICE proposed a number of potential program names:9โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

  • Informed Citizens for the Environment
  • Information Council for the Environment
  • Intelligent Concern for the Environment
  • Informed Choices for the Environment

Gale Klappa & ICE

A report at the Energy & Policy Institute detailed the role of Gale Klappa in ICE, then vice president at Southern Company, and retired CEO of We Energies.10Matt Kasper. โ€œWisconsin Energy Corp. CEO, Gale Klappa, President of Global Warming Misinformation Campaign Earlier In His Career,โ€ Energy and Policy Institute, July 8, 2015. 11โ€œGale E. Klappa,โ€ WEC Energy Group. Archived April 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/E3IPI 12โ€œChairman Gale Klappa stays atop We Energies’ parent-company pay,โ€ Milwaukee Business Journal, March 24, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/V215a

Back in 1991, Klappa was interviewed in a the New York Times article regarding the leaked ICE documents, saying:13Matt Kasper. โ€œWisconsin Energy Corp. CEO, Gale Klappa, President of Global Warming Misinformation Campaign Earlier In His Career,โ€ Energy and Policy Institute, July 8, 2015. 14Matthew L. Wald. โ€œPro-Coal Ad Campaign Disputes Warming Idea,โ€ The New York Times, July 8, 1991. Archived April 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/otQY9

โ€œThose who are predicting catastrophe have been very effective at getting their message across in national media, and in so-called โ€˜public serviceโ€™ announcements. But there is another viewpoint, a substantial viewpoint from a body of reputable scientists, and that viewpoint has really not been made available to a large majority,โ€ Klappa told The New York Times in a telephone interview.15Matt Kasper. โ€œWisconsin Energy Corp. CEO, Gale Klappa, President of Global Warming Misinformation Campaign Earlier In His Career,โ€ Energy and Policy Institute, July 8, 2015.

Amy Jahns, Media Relations Specialist at We Energies, responded to Energy & Policy Institute writer Matt Kasper on how Klappa became involved in ICE. โ€œGale Klappa served as president of the ICE board more than 25 years ago,โ€ she said, going on to present Wisconsin Energy’s emission control investments and reductions.16Matt Kasper. โ€œWisconsin Energy Corp. CEO, Gale Klappa, President of Global Warming Misinformation Campaign Earlier In His Career,โ€ Energy and Policy Institute, July 8, 2015.

Stance on Climate Change

May 15, 1991

Writing on a templated letter with ICE letterhead, offering โ€œadditional information on global climate change,โ€ Patrick Michaels wrote:17โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

โ€œWe believe it is wrong to predict that higher levels of carbon dioxide will bring catastrophic global warming.โ€18โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

Funding

ICE proposed the following plan for fundraising:19โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

  1. Build support for the concept of the ICE strategy among our neighbors.
  2. Match Southern Company’s commitment by having four or five of our neighbors join us in raising $125,000 by January 31, 1991.
  3. Raise total commitments of $525,000 by January 31, 1991 to allow the test market project to proceed on schedule.20โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

The initial proposed budget was $510,000 for Media, PR, Research, and Production in a number of test markets.21โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

Research Documents via Greenpeace & Ozone Action

Key People

Science Advisory Panel (1991)22โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

Board Members (1991)23โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

Actions

January 29, 2017

In an interview with DeSmog’s Graham Readfearn, Fred Palmer outlined the initial formation of ICE. He said that he had been approached by Gale Klappa, then of Southern Company, and Fred Lukens of Minnkota Power, asking him to join the board.24Graham Readfearn. โ€œ‘God Bless Trump’: 25 Years Ago This Man Kick Started the First Fossil Fuelโ€“Funded Campaigns to Attack Climate Science,โ€ DeSmog, January 29, 2017.

โ€œI went to my board not long after the Hansen presentation, probably in 1990, and I said, you know, these coal plants have the most CO2 coming out of them than anywhere else. It was the top of the food chain, I called it. The board agreed. The board said I could go on the ICE board, so I did,โ€ Palmer said.25Graham Readfearn. โ€œ‘God Bless Trump’: 25 Years Ago This Man Kick Started the First Fossil Fuelโ€“Funded Campaigns to Attack Climate Science,โ€ DeSmog, January 29, 2017.

However, he added that he soon became โ€œdissatisfiedโ€ with ICE’s approach. Palmer said, โ€œI didnโ€™t think it was a PR issue. I thought it was a scientific educational issue.โ€26Graham Readfearn. โ€œ‘God Bless Trump’: 25 Years Ago This Man Kick Started the First Fossil Fuelโ€“Funded Campaigns to Attack Climate Science,โ€ DeSmog, January 29, 2017.

โ€œI have always been about education, but I was chair (of ICE) and [โ€ฆ] I looked at it and I said โ€˜I donโ€™t like thisโ€™ and so we got out of ICE and it was abandoned and Western Fuels started the Greening Earth Society,โ€ he added.27Graham Readfearn. โ€œ‘God Bless Trump’: 25 Years Ago This Man Kick Started the First Fossil Fuelโ€“Funded Campaigns to Attack Climate Science,โ€ DeSmog, January 29, 2017.

July 2015

A report by the Union of Concerned Scientists titled โ€œThe Climate Deception Dossiersโ€œ included a section detailing the โ€œmisleading advertisingโ€ in the ICE campaign. The report noted that โ€œICEโ€™s own internal documents show that as the organization was running its ad campaign the group was aware of science showing a ‘long-term warming trend,’ including record warmth and above-average temperatures.โ€ 28โ€œThe Climate Deception Dossiers (2015),โ€ Union of Concerned Scientists, July 9, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/wC27p

May 2, 1991

According to correspondence to Bill Brier of the Edison Electric Institute, ICE’s โ€œtest market materialsโ€ included five newspaper adverts and four sixty-second radio spots. The newspaper ads would run week beginning May 12, and end June 9.29โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

The radio ads would run in Flagstaff, featuring Dr. Bob Balling, with the final two weeks featuring ads with both Balling and Bruce Williams. Ads in the Bowling Green region would also feature Pat Michaels.30โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

The following text was proposed for an ad on the Rush Limbaugh show, which would run in Fargo and Bowling Green according to the letter to Bill Brier:31โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

The letter is signed by Fred Lukens, and CC’d to Gale Klappa.

February 13โ€“22, 1991

ICE commissioned a telephone survey consisting of 1500 interviews with objectives to identify the following:32โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

  • Current awareness and familiarity with the global warming issue;
  • Recent exposure to information concerning global warming, including the types of media and sources in which the information appeared;
  • Responses to various messages concerning global warming;
  • Assessments of the credibility of various spokespersons and groups on topics related to global warming;
  • Key audiences and media for messages concerning global warming.

The survey report includes a number of recommendations for ICE. With regard to target audiences, it suggests that โ€œolder, less-educated males who are not typically active information-seekersโ€ are more likely to ‘favor the ICE agenda’.โ€33โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

โ€œOne possible target audience includes those who are most receptive to messages describing the motivations and vested interests of people currently making pronouncements on global warmingโ€”for example, the statement that some members of the media scare the public about global warming to increase their audience and their influence. People who respond most favorably to such statements are older, less-educated males from larger households, who are not typically active information-seekers, and are not likely to be ‘green’ consumers,โ€ the report reads.

โ€œMembers of this group are skeptical about global warming, predisposed to favor the ICE agenda, and likely to be even more supportive of that agenda following exposure to new information. They are not, however, accustomed to taking political action. They are good targets for radio advertisements.

โ€œAnother possible target segment is younger, lower-income women. These women are more receptive than other audience segments to factual information concerning the evidence for global warming. They are likely to be โ€œgreenโ€ consumers, to believe the earth is warming, and to think the problem is serious. However, they are also likely to soften their support for federal legislation after hearing new information on global warming. These women are good targets for magazine advertisements.โ€34โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

Public Relations Tour

May 20, 1991

As part of an ICE โ€œpublic relations tour,โ€ the group proposed the following schedule:35โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

11:00 a.m.
Meet with editors and writers at the Arizona Daily Sun. Dr. Robert
Balling from Arizona State University or Dr. Sherwood Idso from the U.S. Water Conservation Laboratory will replace Dr. Michaels for the Flagstaff meetings.

1:00 p.m.
Tape appearance on North Arizona Outlook, weekly public affairs program on KN.AZ-TV.

3:00 p.m.
Appearance on KNAU-AM radio talk show.

May 15, 1991

12:30 p.m.
Meet with editors and writers at The Fargo Forum.

2:00 p.m.
Tape appearance on KX4 News Conference on KXJB-TV. Program is hosted by Kathy Coyle and airs on Sundays.

4:00 p.m.
Appear on KTHI-TV’s On The Line hosted by Steve Poitras. Half-hour program.

5:00 p.m.
Meeting with editorial staff at WDAY-TV. Tape interview for evening news.

May 14, 1991

10:45 a.m.
Appearance on WBKO-TV’s โ€œMiddayโ€ hosted by Beverly Kirk.

1:00 p.m.
Meet with editors and writers at the Bowling Green Daily News.

2:30 PM
Tape appearance on WKYU-TV’s โ€œOutlookโ€ hosted by Barbara Deeb. Tape will also be broadcast on WKYU-FM’s โ€œMidday Editionโ€

Sample ICE Ads

*Click to view full-size images.36โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

โ€œThe most serious problem with catastrophic global warming isโ€“it may not be true.โ€

The most serious problem with catastrophic global warming isโ€“it may not be true

โ€œWho told you the earth was warmingโ€ฆ Chicken Little?โ€

Who told you the earth was warming... Chicken Little?

โ€œDoomsday is Cancelled. Again.โ€

Doomsday is Cancelled. Again

Contact & Address

The following address was present on ICE letterhead:38โ€œDistorting the Debate: A Case Study of Corporate Greenwashing,โ€ Ozone Action, 1996. Retrieved from Greenpeace research documents.

P.O. Box 414998
Kansas City MO 64141-4998
1-800-346-6269

Other Resources

Resources

Related Profiles

U.S. Grains Council Background The U.S. Grains Council (USGC) is a trade association that โ€œdevelops export markets for U.S. barley, corn, sorghum and related productsโ€ including dried grains...
National Pork Producers Council Background The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) is a Washington, DC-based trade body representing the US pork industry. The NPPC represents โ€œthe federal...
American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) Background The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is an organization designed to link state legislators with corporations and create te...
National Chicken Council Background The National Chicken Council (NCC) is a Washington DC-based trade association representing the US poultry industry. The NCC seeks to influence US legislat...