Hudson Institute

The Hudson Institute

Background

The Hudson Institute (HI) was founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn and his colleagues at the Rand Corporation. Founded at the height of the Cold War, the Institute started with a focus on defense, nuclear power, and strategy. Since 9/11, the institute has changed focus to the terrorism and has strongly advocated for the Iraq War.1โ€œHudson Institute,โ€ Conservative Transparency. Accessed April 20, 2016.

Herman Kahnโ€™s notable contribution was his book, โ€œOn Thermonuclear War,โ€ published in 1960, about the consequences of a thermonuclear war. According to the New York Times, โ€œan editor at Scientific American magazine denounced [the book] as ‘a moral tract on mass murder: how to plan it, how to commit it, how to get away with it, how to justify it.’โ€2Joseph B. Treaster. โ€œHerman Kahn Dies; Futurist and Thinker on Nuclear Strategy,โ€ The New York Times, July 8, 1983. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/7YMVZ The character Dr. Strangelove, according to the New Yorker, is โ€œan only slightly parodic version of Kahn.โ€3Louis Menand. โ€œFat Man,โ€ The New Yorker, June 27, 2005. Archived September 25, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/kNr8F

According to their website, the Hudson Institute is a 501(c)(3) organization โ€œfinanced by tax deductible contributions from private individuals, corporations, foundations, and by government grants.โ€ They describe themselves as โ€œAn independent research organization promoting new ideas for the advancement of global security, prosperity and freedom.โ€4โ€œAn independent research organization promoting new ideas for the advancement of global security, prosperity and freedom,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 25, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/WcMJ0

Hudson seeks to โ€œguide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings, and recommendations.โ€

Originally founded in Croton-on-Hudson, the Hudson Institute moved its headquarters to Indianapolis in 1984 after the death of Herman Kahn. On June 1, 2004 Hudson Institute moved its operations to Washington, D.C., โ€œin an effort to focus its research on foreign policy and national security issues.โ€5โ€œHistory,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 25, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xB7ll

The Guardian names the Hudson Institute in their 2015 report, โ€œSecretive donors gave US climate denial groups $125m over three years,โ€ as one of the top recipients of funding from two secretive organizations โ€” Donors Trust, and Donors Capital Fund โ€” having taken in $7.9 million over three years.6Suzanne Goldenberg and Helena Bengtsson. โ€œSecretive donors gave US climate denial groups 5m over three years,โ€ The Guardian, June 9, 2015. Archived September 25, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/KqMx1

According to The Guardian, this money helped to โ€œbuild a network of thinktanks and activist groups. These worked to defeat climate bills in Congress and are mobilising against Environmental Protection Agency rules to reduce carbon pollution from power plants which are due to be finalised this summer.โ€7Suzanne Goldenberg and Helena Bengtsson. โ€œSecretive donors gave US climate denial groups 5m over three years,โ€ The Guardian, June 9, 2015. Archived September 25, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/KqMx1

Center for Global Food Issues (Now Defunct)

One of the Hudson Institute’s projects is the Center for Global Food Issues (CGFI), directed by climate change skeptic Dennis T. Avery. While the Center describes its purview as โ€œresearch and analysis of agriculture and the environmental concerns surrounding food and fiber production,โ€ Avery has also used its website as a platform to discuss global warming issues. CGFI.org no longer appears to be in operation and it is excluded from the Internet Archive.8โ€œSCIENCE RECOMMENDS CLIMATE MODEL RE-START, BY DENNIS. T. AVERY,โ€ Centre for Global Food Issues, July 8, 2014. Archived with WebCite September 25, 2015. 9โ€œAbout CGFI,โ€ Centre for Global Food Issues. Archived September 25, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/81rWG

Stance on Climate Change

Hudson Institute scholars have put forward Geoengineering as a solution to climate change, something that has been described as a โ€œdangerous solutionโ€ by some.10Rachel Smoker. โ€œGeoengineering Is a Dangerous Solution to Climate Change,โ€ Huffington Post, March 22, 2014. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lP69m 11Clive Hamilton. โ€œThe Risks of Climate Engineering,โ€ The New York Times. Archived September 26, 2015. February 12, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/LtryI

2014

Dennis T. Avery, Director of the Center for Global Food Issues, contends that global cooling should be more feared than global warming, and that increased CO2 will increase crop yields:12Dennis T. Avery. โ€œCarbon Dioxide Won’t Cause Famines,โ€ Hudson Institute, June 2, 2014. Archived April 21, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/BMLn7

โ€œThere is no visible reason to expect famines today due to carbon dioxide, which improves plant growth for crops, forests, grasslands and algae, as atmospheric CO2 levels increase.

The danger is the cold, chaotic weather of the โ€œlittle ice agesโ€ themselves. That will shrink agricultural zones and shorten growing seasons.โ€

โ€œOur crop yields are also rising because of another surprising factor: more atmospheric carbon dioxide. This trace gas (400 ppm or 0.04% of Earthโ€™s atmosphere) acts like fertilizer for plants, and thus for the animals and people who depend on them. Studies show that doubling CO2 in the air will boost the growth of herbaceous plants by about 30% to 35%; trees will benefit even more.โ€

โ€œMisguided opposition to biotechnology, fossil fuels and increased atmospheric carbon dioxide could very well condemn millions of people to malnutrition and starvation, and numerous wildlife species to extinction.โ€

2011

โ€œClimate change does pose some risks; yet those risks do not imply that massive social engineering for GHG control is either possible or desirable. Only when an awareness of this reality sinks in among public intellectuals is a more serious policy discourse likely to emerge.โ€ โ€” Lee Lane, Hudson Institute Scholar 13Lee Lane. โ€œHistory, Ideology, and U.S. Climate Policy: Beyond the Orthodoxies of Left and Rightโ€ (PDF), The Hudson Institute, December, 2011. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

Funding

The following is a combination of data archived by the Conservative Transparency Project plus original research of public 990 tax forms. Note that not all funding values have been verified by DeSmog.14โ€œHudson Institute,โ€ Conservative Transparency. Accessed April 20, 2016.

View the attached spreadsheet for additional information on the Hudson Institute’s funding by year (.xlsx).

DonorTotal
The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation$15,757,690
Donors Capital Fund$10,955,000
Smith Richardson Foundation$8,691,057
Hertog Foundation$5,729,463
Sarah Scaife Foundation$5,363,000
John M. Olin Foundation$3,034,840
William H. Donner Foundation$1,520,669
Searle Freedom Trust$1,205,000
PhRMA$1,145,495
John Templeton Foundation$1,001,233
The Carthage Foundation$875,000
Pew Charitable Trusts$680,000
The Marcus Foundation$620,000
Abstraction Fund$477,325
National Philanthropic Trust$425,000
DonorsTrust$419,000
Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis$399,500
Fairbrook Foundation$390,000
F.M. Kirby Foundation$375,000
The Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation$365,000
Sweetfeet Foundation$360,000
Schwab Charitable Fund$301,000
Newton D. & Rochelle F. Becker Foundation$285,000
National Christian Charitable Foundation$249,000
Earhart Foundation$236,783
Scaife Family Foundation$221,000
Joyce and Donald Rumsfeld Foundation$200,000
Newton and Rochelle Becker Family Foundation$190,000
Stuart Family Foundation$175,000
Walton Family Foundation$150,000
Castle Rock Foundation$145,000
William E. Simon Foundation$86,000
JM Foundation$75,000
Charlotte and Walter Kohler Charitable Trust$70,000
Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation$69,000
The Randolph Foundation$67,000
Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation$62,650
Jewish Community Fund$52,680
Diana Davis Spencer Foundation$50,000
Alan and Hope Winters Family Foundation$40,000
Brady Education Foundation$40,000
Newton and Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust$35,000
Adolph Coors Foundation$30,000
Philip M McKenna Foundation$30,000
The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation$25,000
Exxon Mobil$25,000
David H. Koch Charitable Foundation$20,000
Armstrong Foundation$15,000
Gilder Foundation$10,000
Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation$10,000
Milstein Family Foundation$10,000
Peterson G Peterson Foundation$9,000
Bradley Impact Fund$7,000
Jaquelin Hume Foundation$5,000
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation$2,000
Neal and Jane Freeman Foundation$1,000
Grand Total$62,788,385

ExxonMobil Funding

According to Greenpeace’s ExxonSecrets, the Hudson Institute has received $25,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.15ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Hudson Institute. Accessed March 30, 2019. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/mSL93

Koch Funding

According to data compiled by Greenpeace USA, the Hudson Institute received $82,650 from Koch foundations between 2000 and 2012. See additional data via research at DeSmog below:16โ€œKoch Industries: Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine,โ€ Greenpeace USA. Archived March 14, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/au7P4

YearClaude R. Lambe Charitable FoundationDavid H. Koch Charitable FoundationCharles G. Koch Charitable FoundationGrand Total
2000 $10,000 $10,000
2001 $10,000 $10,000
2002$12,650 $12,650
2011$25,000 $25,000
2012$25,000 $25,000
2018 $69,000$69,000
Grand Total$62,650$20,000 $151,650

990 Tax Forms

Key People

View key people by year below, or view the attached spreadsheet for a full list of the Hudson Instituteโ€™s key People (.xlsx) including sources.

Leadership

Name201517โ€œLeadership & Board,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QAZHK201618โ€œLeadership,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived August 1, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/dgeNTDescription
Brian Blake YSenior Fellow and Director, Corporate Relations
Daniel McKiverganYYVice President, Government Relations
David TellYYSenior Fellow and Director, Public Affairs & Special Projects
Joel ScanlonYYDirector of Studies
John P. WaltersYYChief Operating Officer
Kenneth R. WeinsteinYYPresident and CEO
Lewis LibbyYYSenior Vice President
Matthew Hunter YCorporate Secretary and Special Advisor to the President and CEO
Nicholas MackeyYYDirector of Operations
Thereza AustriaY Director of Finance
William J. LutiYYVice President, Strategic Implementation

Board of Trustees

Name201519โ€œLeadership & Board,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QAZHK201620โ€œLeadership,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived August 1, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/dgeNTDescription
Allan R. TesslerY Board Member, Chairman Emeritus
Marie-Josรฉe KravisYYBoard Member, Vice Chair, and Senior Fellow
Sarah May SternYYChairman of the Board of Trustees, Board Member
Walter P. SternYYBoard Member, Chairman Emeritus

Trustees

Name201521โ€œLeadership & Board,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QAZHK201622โ€œLeadership,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived August 1, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/dgeNTDescription
Allan R. TesslerYY
Curtin Winsor, Jr.Y
Deborah Kahn CunninghamYY
Jack DavidYY
Jeffrey L. BerensonYY
Kenneth R. WeinsteinYYPresident and CEO
Laurence C. Leeds, Jr.YY
Linden S. BlueYY
Margaret WhiteheadYY
Marie-Josรฉe KravisYYBoard Member, Vice Chair, and Senior Fellow
Max SingerYY
Mitch DanielsYY
Robert DuPuyYY
Russell PennoyerYY
Sarah May SternYYChairman of the Board of Trustees, Board Member
Thomas C. BarryYY
Walter P. SternYYBoard Member, Chairman Emeritus
William SchweitzerY
Yoji OhashiYY

Senior Fellows

Name201523โ€œExperts,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fbE6p2016Description
Abram N. ShulskyYYSenior Fellow
Andrew NatsiosYYSenior Fellow
Arthur HermanYYSenior Fellow
Brian Blake YSenior Fellow and Director, Corporate Relations
Carol AdelmanYYDirector, Center for Global Prosperity
Charles FairbanksYYSenior Fellow
Charles HornerYYSenior Fellow
Christopher DeMuthYYDistinguished Fellow. President of the American Enterprise Institute.
Christopher SandsY Senior Fellow
Craig Kennedy YSenior Fellow
David SatterYYSenior Fellow
David W. MurrayYYSenior Fellow
Douglas J. FeithYYDirector, Center for National Security Strategies
Elaine L. Chao YDistinguished Fellow
Eric B. BrownYYSenior Fellow
Gabriel SchoenfeldYYSenior Fellow
Hank CardelloYYDirector, Obesity Solutions Initiative
Hanns KuttnerYYSenior Fellow
Harold Furchtgott-RothYYDirector, Center for the Economics of the Internet
Hillel FradkinYYDirector, Center on Islam, Democracy and the Future of the Muslim World
Husain HaqqaniYYDirector for South and Central Asia
Irwin M. StelzerYYSenior Fellow
Jack DavidYY
Jaime DaremblumYYDirector, Center for Latin American Studies
Jeffrey H. AndersonYYSenior Fellow
Jeremiah NorrisYYSenior Fellow and Director, Center for Science in Public Policy
John C. WeicherYYDirector, Center for Housing and Financial Markets
John FonteYYDirector, Center for American Common Culture
John LeeYYSenior Fellow
John P. WaltersYYChief Operating Officer
Jun IsomuraYYSenior Fellow
Lee SmithYYSenior Fellow
Lewis LibbyYYSenior Vice President
Maneeza HossainYYSenior Fellow
Marie-Josรฉe KravisYYBoard Member, Vice Chair, and Senior Fellow
Max SingerYY
Melanie KirkpatrickYYSenior Fellow
Michael DoranYYSenior Fellow
Michael PillsburyYYSenior Fellow & Director of the Center for Chinese Strategy
Mike RogersYYDistinguished Fellow
Naser KhaderYYSenior Fellow
Nina SheaYYDirector, Center for Religious Freedom
Paul MarshallYYSenior Fellow, Center for Religious Freedom
Richard WeitzYYDirector, Center for Political-Military Analysis
Robert M. McDowellYYSenior Fellow
Ron Prosor YDistinguished Fellow
Ronald W. DworkinYYSenior Fellow
Samuel TadrosYYSenior Fellow
Seth CropseyYYDirector, Center for American Seapower
Walter Russell MeadYYDistinguished Scholar, American Strategy and Statesmanship
William A. SchambraYYSenior Fellow
William SchneiderYYSenior Fellow

Fellows

Name201524โ€œExperts,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fbE6p201625โ€œSenior Fellows,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived August 1, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/bhC62Description
Andrei A. PiontkovskyYYVisiting Fellow
Ann MarloweYYVisiting Fellow
Benjamin Haddad YResearch Fellow
Brendan BrownYYAdjunct Fellow
Bryan McGrathYYDeputy Director, Center for American Seapower
Charles DavidsonYYExecutive Director, Kleptocracy Initiative
Hannah ThoburnYYResearch Fellow
James C. CaprettaY Adjunct Fellow
Jerry WeinbergerYYAdjunct Fellow
Joel SchwartzYYAdjunct Senior Fellow
John BalfeYYAdjunct Fellow
John H. ShenefieldYYAdjunct Fellow
Julie DavidsonY Kleptocracy Initiative
Lee LaneYYVisiting Fellow
Lela GilbertYYAdjunct Fellow, Center for Religious Freedom
Lianchao HanYYVisiting Fellow
Maina SinghYYAdjunct Fellow
Marcello PeraYYVisiting Fellow
Mario MancusoYYVisiting Senior Fellow
Marius Laurinavicius YBAFF Security Research Fellow
Martha BaylesYYVisiting Fellow
Melanie MarloweY Visiting Fellow
Michael Pregent YAdjunct Fellow
Nibras KazimiYYVisiting Fellow
Norman PodhoretzYYAdjunct Fellow
Peter Rough YFellow
Rachel Pagano YResearch Fellow
Rebeccah L. HeinrichsYYFellow
Ronald RadoshYYAdjunct Fellow
Shmuel BarYYAdjunct Fellow
Tevi TroyYYAdjunct Fellow
Yoshiki HidakaYYVisiting Senior Fellow

Researchers

Name201526โ€œExperts,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fbE6p201627โ€œSenior Fellows,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived August 1, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/bhC62
Aparna PandeYY
Arielle RothYY
Benjamin HaddadY
Bryan SchwartzYY
Cita StelzerYY
Elias Riskin Y
Idalia Friedson Y
Jeffrey GedminY
Ju Young LeeY
Natalie Duffy Y
Nate Sibley Y
Peter PodkopaevYY
Peter RoughY
Rachel PaganoY
Thomas WeldyY
Tim Wang Y

Past Leadership (2011)

Additional members of the Hudson Institute’s leadership circle, as of January, 2012 included:28โ€œHudson Institute Leadership,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived January 10, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Yh6Lo

Herbert I. London โ€” President Emeritus
John W. Freeman โ€” Chief Financial Officer
Grace Paine Terzian โ€” Vice President for Communications

Hudson Scholars (2011)

As of 2011, The Hudson Institute listed the following scholars as โ€œAvailable for Commentโ€ on their โ€œguide for the mediaโ€:29โ€œHudson Scholars Available for Comment,โ€ The Hudson Institute. Archived October 7, 2011. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Mv6zp

Actions

June 13, 2016

The Hudson Institute was listed as a creditor in Peabody Energy’s 2016 bankruptcy filings, reports the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD/PRWatch).30Nick Surgey. โ€œPeabody Coal Bankruptcy Reveals Climate Denial Network Funding,โ€ PRWatch, June 13, 2016. Archived June 20, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/DR5pv

While the available bankruptcy documents do not list the scale or dates of funding, they outline Peabody Energy’s financial ties to a large network of groups promoting climate change denial.31โ€œIn re: Peabody Energy Corporation, et al. Debtors,โ€ United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division, Case 16-42529, May 27, 2016. Retrieved from DocumentCloud.

Prominent individuals appearing in the documents include climate deniers Willie Soon, Richard Lindzen, Roy Spencer and Richard Berman. The long list of organizations also includes groups such as Americans for Prosperity, American Legislative Exchange Council, CFACT, Institute for Energy Research, State Policy Network, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and dozens more.32Farron Cousins. โ€œCourt Documents Show Coal Giant Peabody Energy Funded Dozens Of Climate Denial Groups,โ€ DeSmog, June 13, 2016.

The Guardian also analysed and reported on the Peabody bankruptcy findings:33Suzanne Goldenberg and Helena Bengtsson. โ€œBiggest US coal company funded dozens of groups questioning climate change,โ€ The Guardian, June 13, 2016. Archived June 20, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Oibzy

โ€œThese groups collectively are the heart and soul of climate denial,โ€ said Kert Davies, founder of the Climate Investigation Center, who has spent 20 years tracking funding for climate denial. โ€œItโ€™s the broadest list I have seen of one company funding so many nodes in the denial machine.โ€

The companyโ€™s filings reveal funding for a range of organisations which have fought Barack Obamaโ€™s plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and denied the very existence of climate change. [โ€ฆ]

Among Peabodyโ€™s beneficiaries, the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change has insisted โ€“ wrongly โ€“ that carbon emissions are not a threat but โ€œthe elixir of lifeโ€ while the American Legislative Exchange Council is trying to overturn Environmental Protection Agency rules cutting emissions from power plants. Meanwhile, Americans for Prosperity campaigns against carbon pricing. The Oklahoma chapter was on the list. [โ€ฆ]

โ€œThe breadth of the groups with financial ties to Peabody is extraordinary. Thinktanks, litigation groups, climate scientists, political organisations, dozens of organisations blocking action on climate all receiving funding from the coal industry,โ€ said Nick Surgey, director of research for the Center for Media and Democracy.

โ€œWe expected to see some denial money, but it looks like Peabody is the treasury for a very substantial part of the climate denial movement.โ€

Notable organizations listed in the initial documents include:

Notable individuals named in the initial documents include the following:

March 2016

A DeSmog investigation found that the Hudson Institute, via industry funding and advocacy, may have been instrumental in opening up Israel’s offshore natural gas reserves for drilling in the Mediterranean Sea for Noble Energy.34Steve Horn. โ€œHoly Gas: Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy Team Member Pushed Offshore Drilling in Israel,โ€ DeSmog, March 29, 2016. DeSmog reports that George Papadoupolousโ€”past research assistant at the Hudson Institute and now a member of Donald Trump’s foreign policy advisory teamโ€”may have played a key role.35โ€œIntroduction to Essays and Contributorsโ€ (PDF), AHIF Policy Journal (Spring, 2015). Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

In summer 2015, Papadoupolous co-authored a six-page Hebrew language paper that included the Hudson Instituteโ€™s logo and that of the brands of his collaborating co-authors that was submitted to the Israeli Energy Ministry. The paper advocates for offshore gas drilling and calls for an industry-friendly financial scheme in the concessions process.

According to the Israeli Energy Ministry Hebrew-language website, one of the paperโ€™s co-authors presented it at an Israeli Energy Minister hearing. 36โ€œThe hearing topic outline to regulate the natural gas industry,โ€ Energy.gobv.il, July 22, 2016. Translated with Google Translate. Archived April 21, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/p0Lb8 Months after they submitted the report to Israelโ€™s Energy Ministry in December 2015, the Energy Ministry approved offshore drilling conditions for Noble Energy and Delek Group, The New York Times reports. 37Isabel Kershner and Stanley Reed. โ€œIsrael Grants Approval for Development of Giant Offshore Gas Field,โ€ The New York Times, December 17, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OBqAN One of Eco Energy’s clients, according to its website, is Delek Group.38โ€œCompany profile,โ€ Eco Energy. Archived April 21, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/1p5Nt

Hudson Institute senior fellow Seth Cropsey co-authored the paper with Papadoupolous and affiliates of both Israelโ€™s Eco Energy and Bethesda, Marylandโ€™s Benjamin Schlesinger and Associates. Papadoupolous and Cropsey have co-written other papers including a Hudson Institute report titled โ€U.S. Policy and the Strategic Relationship of Greece, Cyprus and Israel: Power Shifts in the Eastern Mediterraneanโ€39โ€œGeorge Papadopoulos: London Centre of International Law Practice,โ€ LinkedIn. PDF Archived at DeSmog March 24, 2016. , and another titled, โ€œVice President Bidenโ€™s Trip to Cyprus: A Lost Opportunity?โ€40โ€œSeth Cropsey and George Papadopoulos,โ€ AHIF Policy Journal (Spring, 2015). PDF Archived at DeSmog.

Desmog reports a connection between the Hudson Institute, Noble Energy, and Donald Trump including shared board members and funding.

July 8, 2014

Dennis Avery posted a piece on the Center for Global Food Issues blog titled โ€Science Recommends Climate Model Re-Start.โ€41โ€œScience Recommends Climate Model Re-Start,โ€ Centre for Global Food Issues, July 8, 2014. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0nqMM

โ€œThe earth is currently in one of its cyclical global warmings, directly following the Little Ice Age. In the recent past, such warmings have lasted from 350 years (the Medieval Warming) to 800 years (The Roman Warming),โ€ Avery Writes. โ€œEven during this global warming, however, the temperature of the Pacific will cool periodically. The earth will then also cool as the Pacific is the worldโ€™s largest heat sink. NASA satellites reported that PDO began to shift cool about 2003, which would mean that cooling will probably last until roughly 2033.โ€

Avery’s argument is #1 on Skeptical Science’s โ€œMost used Climate Myths.โ€ According to Skeptical Science, while climate has changed in the past, this time humans are the largest cause: โ€œScientific analysis of past climates shows that greenhouse gasses, principally CO2, have controlled most ancient climate changes. The evidence for that is spread throughout the geological record. This makes it clear that this time around humans are the cause, mainly by our CO2 emissions.โ€42โ€œWhat does past climate change tell us about global warming?โ€ SkepticalScience. Accessed September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/re2nE

February 2013

The Hudson Institute released a report titled โ€œInstitutional Choices for Regulating Oil and Gas Wellsโ€ (PDF) which focused on hydraulic fracturing (fracking), and why most strict regulations on the industry should be avoided. The report was authored by the Hudson Institute Scholar (and โ€œExpertโ€ on climate change), Lee Lane.43Lee Lane. โ€œInstitutional Choices for Regulating Oil and Gas Wellsโ€ (PDF), The Hudson Institute. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

The report begins, stating that โ€œClearly, the nation can reap large benefits from exploiting its natural gas resources. GDP, national security, and the environment all stand to gain. It is also true that, to maximize net benefits, the public sector should limit the environmental side effects of finding and producing natural gas. Proposals for greater federal control, however, raise a basic question: What should be the division of labor between Washington and the states?โ€

According to Lane, โ€œThe shale gas boom, if government policy allows it to proceed, offers vast benefits. The economic gains are patent. Large benefits in national and global security are also in the offing. And the boom will also help to dampen growth in global warming emissions.โ€

The study concludes, โ€œIn sum, developing U.S. natural gas resources will yield gains in economics, national security, and the environment. [โ€ฆ] The FRAC Act would impose a new set of federal standards on state regulators. The above analysis implies that this step would not enhance the efficient division of labor between federal and state governments.โ€

On February 12, 2013, Lee Lane led a panel discussion on its findings and the key related questions facing policymakers. Video Below.44โ€œInstitutional Choices for Regulating Oil and Gas Wells,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived August 1, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/1fQwK

December 2011

The Hudson Institute released a publication titled โ€œHistory, Ideology, and U.S. Climate Policy: Beyond the Orthodoxies of Left and Rightโ€ (PDF) written by Hudson Institute Scholar Lee Lane.

According to Lane, โ€œClimate change does pose some risks; yet those risks do not imply that massive social engineering for GHG control is either possible or desirable. Only when an awareness of this reality sinks in among public intellectuals is a more serious policy discourse likely to emerge.โ€ He also contends that โ€œโ€The United States is almost certainly incurring higher costs from its climate policies than it is from climate change.โ€45Lee Lane. โ€œHistory, Ideology, and U.S. Climate Policy: Beyond the Orthodoxies of Left and Rightโ€ (PDF), The Hudson Institute, December, 2011. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

Lee Lane, whom The Hudson Institute lists as an Expert on Climate Change, has also been Co-Director of the Geoengineering Project at the American Enterprise Institute and Vice President for Policy at the Association of American Railroads.46โ€œExperts – Lee Lane,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 25, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ZkLL5

Lee Lane was also part of a Hudson Institute Panel Discussion on climate policy titled โ€œClimate Policy Holy Wars: Clashing Secular Religions and Stubborn Economic Realities.โ€47โ€œClimate Policy Holy Wars: Clashing Secular Religions and Stubborn Economic Realities,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/AJ6nq

June 8, 2006

Dennis Avery of the Hudson Institute published an article in their center for global food issues titled โ€œGlobal Warming: Some Inconvenient Glaciers.โ€48โ€œGlobal Warming: Some Inconvenient Glaciers,โ€ Center for Global Food Issues. Retrieved from The Progressive Conservative, USA. Archived April 20, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/b9qYL

In the piece, Avery mentions a study from the June, 2006 edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that he suggests provides evidence that changes in the sun are responsible for the retreat of glaciers.

Avery does not mention that the study he refers to also points out that glaciers are sensitive to small temperature changes which would be exacerbated by man-made global warming.49Kevin Grandia. โ€œNEWS ALERT: Hudson Institute and Dennis Avery’s Scientific Spin on Andes Glacier Study,โ€ DeSmog, June 14, 2006.

September 2003

The Hudson Institute released a study that suggested higher CO2 levels would be beneficial rather than causing the potential extinction of natural species.50Dennis T. Avery. โ€œGlobal Warming and the Fortune of Species,โ€ The Hudson Institute, November 4, 2003. Archived November 3, 2004. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/tIqTP

Hudson’s report was titled โ€œThe Specter of Species Extinction,โ€ and led by the father-and-sons team of Sherwood, Craig, and Keith Idso. It concluded that โ€œhigher CO2 levels act as fertilizer for trees and plants, and that higher CO2 levels also reduce the amount of energy ‘wasted’ by virtually all plant species on a process called photorespiration. As long as temperatures and CO2 are both rising, trees and plants will be vigorous enough to exploit warmingโ€™s opportunities to expand their range, rather than getting death notices from Greenpeace.โ€

Hudson Institute Contact & Location

The Hudson Institute lists the following contact information on its website:51โ€œDirectons,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived May 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/2sKOa

Hudson Institute
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20004
P: 202-974-2400
F: 202-974-2410
E-mail [email protected]

Hudson Institute, Noble Energy, & Donald Trump

In 2013, Hudson Institute gave then-Noble Energy CEO Charles D. Davidson its first ever Global Leadership Award for his company’s role in discovering and moving to drill offshore for gas in Israel.52โ€œNoble Energyโ€™s Charles D. Davidson Recognized with Hudson Instituteโ€™s Global Leadership Award,โ€ Hudson Institute, December 10, 2013. Archived April 21, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CPqoO

โ€œDavidson was honored today for his transformative successes in developing energy resources in the United States and Eastern Mediterranean, which have led to enhanced U.S. energy security and competitiveness and turned the Eastern Mediterranean into a burgeoning energy-producing region,โ€ reads a December 2013 Hudson press release.53โ€œNoble Energyโ€™s Charles D. Davidson Recognized with Hudson Instituteโ€™s Global Leadership Award,โ€ Hudson Institute, December 10, 2013. Archived April 21, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CPqoO

Davidson also funded the Hudson Institute in the past. Another connection is Noble Board member Jeffrey Berensen who also serves on Hudson Institute’s Board of Trustees54โ€œLeadership & Board,โ€ Hudson Institute. Archived September 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QAZHK and was a top-tier funder according to the Institute’s 2015 Annual Report. Noble Board of Directors member Edward Cox is also a Hudson donor.55โ€œHudson Institute 2015 Annual Reportโ€ (PDF), the Hudson Institute. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

According to financial disclosure forms released by Donald Trump, he formerly had 17,800 shares of Noble Energy stock, valued at $1.12 million when he sold them in January 2014.56โ€œHow Donald Trump Made Million on Stocks,โ€ NewsMax, July 15, 2015. Archived April 21, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/PD5Bu

Social Media

Other Resources

Resources

Related Profiles

The Heartland Institute Background Stance on Climate Change Funding Key People Actions Heartland International Conference on Climate Change Related&n...
George C. Marshall Institute (GMI) โ€” Now CO2 Coalition Background The George C. Marshall Institute (GMI) was founded in 1984 by William Nierenberg, Frederick Seitz and Robert Jastrow as a โ€œn...
The Mont Pelerin Society (MPS) Background The Mont Pelerin Society (MPS) was created in 1947 by the free market economist and philosopher Friedrich von Hayek and advocates โ€œclassical liberal...
The Fraser Institute Background The Fraser Institute is a libertarian think tank based in Vancouver, British Columbia. They describe themselves as a โ€œindependent Canadian public policy ...