A coalition of organizations composed of Friends of the Earth, the Center for International Environmental Law, and Corporate Ethics International submitted a Freedom of Information Act request [PDF]ย this week asking for all communications between the agency and a former presidential campaign manager for Hillaryย Clinton.
Paul Elliot, the lobbyist in question, served as national deputy director and chief of staff for delegate selection for Clintonโs Presidential campaign committee. ย Heโs now a lobbyistย forย TransCanada, the company aiming to build the controversialย 2,151 mile-longย Keystone XL Pipeline.ย ย
The above organizations are concerned about how the relationship betweenย Secretary of State Clinton and Elliot may impact theย approval process for the controversial tar sands pipeline. ย For the coalition of watchdog organizations, this is just the latest in a series of developments that cast doubt on whether the State Department is fulfilling its obligations to conduct an exhaustive and transparent review of the environmental and public health dangers of the proposed pipeline.
According to Alex Moore of Friends of the Earth,ย โTransCanada clearly sees an opportunity to get this dangerous pipeline approved through Secretary Clintonโs relationship with Paul Elliottโ. ย Afraid that the State Department will fail to do diligence in its environmental assessment of the pipeline project, they believe that this conflict of interest is reason enough for the White House to reassign review of this project to a more impartialย party.
The Keystone XL Pipeline would bring 900,000 barrels a day of dirty tar sands over 2,000 miles through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, and a furtherย 1,661 miles toย refineries on the Gulf Coast. ย After two Enbridge spills in 2010, and a Chevron spill earlier this month, the threats of expanding tar sands production and distribution are heavy on peopleโs minds. ย Theย Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) is telling us the tar sands are โessentially like yogurtโ,ย but the reality is that tar sands crude isย infused with more heavy metals, sulfur and other pollutants than typical oilย products.
It is not just environmental and watchdog organizations that are concerned about the controversial pipeline. Earlier this year, the pipeline generated more than a few vocal opponents includingย over 60 members of Congress.ย
Secretary Clintonโs objectivity in matters related to the pipeline have already been brought to question. ย In October, she received criticism forย sayingย she was โinclinedโ to approve the project despite the fact that her agency was right in the midst of conducting an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. ย Incidentally, Keystone ended up getting failing grade on the EIS, spurring members of Congress to call for another EIS on the controversial project.ย ย
Read more on Friends of the Earth, Center for International and Environmental Law and Corporate Ethics International FOIA request, or learn more about the Keystone XL Pipeline here.ย
Image Credit: ForestEthics
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts