The Fox News "Effect": A Few References

authordefault
on

It is no secret that many in the climate science world are critical of Fox News. The prevailing view seems to beย that the conservative network, although claiming to be โ€œfair and balanced,โ€ is in fact quite biased in its treatment of this and otherย issues.

The opinion isnโ€™t without foundation. Itโ€™s not just Foxโ€™s coverage itself (see image at left, courtesy of Media Matters): Last year, Media Matters exposed an internal email from Washington bureau chief Bill Sammon, commenting on the networkโ€™s coverage of global warming and seeming to demand a misleading treatment of the issue. The email told reporters theyย should

โ€ฆrefrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question. It is not our place as journalists to assert such notions as facts, especially as this debateย intensifies.

Given that warming is indeed a fact, itโ€™s little wonder that when it was released, this email drew a lot ofย attention.

Clearly, thereโ€™s much concern about Fox coverage. But many critics of the network seem unaware of what may be their best argument:ย the existence of several public opinion studies showing a correlation between watching Fox and being misinformed about one or more public policyย issues.

These studies tend to take the same basic form. First, they survey Americans to determine their views about some matter of controversy. Inevitably, some significant percentage of citizens are found to be misinformed about the core facts of the issueโ€“but not just that. The surveys also find that those who watch Fox, or watch it frequently, are more likely to beย misinformed.

Here are five such studiesโ€”and note that this list may be incomplete. This is just what Iโ€™ve come across soย far:

1. Iraq War. In 2003, a survey by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of Maryland found widespread public misperceptions about the Iraq war. For instance, many Americans believed that Saddam Husseinโ€™s Iraq had been involved in 9/11, or that it possessed weapons of mass destruction prior to the U.S. invasion. But not everyone was equally misinformed: โ€œThe extent of Americansโ€™ misperceptions vary significantly depending on their source of news,โ€ PIPA reported. โ€œThose who receive most of their news from Fox News are more likely than average to have misperceptions.โ€ For instance,ย 80 % of Fox viewers held at least one of three Iraq-related misperceptions, more than a variety of other types of news consumers, and especially NPR and PBSย users.

2. Global Warming. In a late 2010 survey, Stanford Universityโ€™s Jon Krosnick found that โ€œmore exposure to Fox News was associated with more rejection of many mainstream scientistsโ€™ claims about global warming, with less trust in scientists, and with more belief that ameliorating global warming would hurt the U.S. economy.โ€ Notably, there was a 25 percentage point gap between the most frequent Fox News watchers (60 %) and thoseย who watch no Fox news (85 %) in whether they think global warming is โ€œcaused mostly by things people do or about equally by things people do and naturalย causes.โ€

3. Health Care. Earlier this year, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a survey on U.S. misperceptions about health care reform. The survey asked 10 questions, and compared the โ€œhigh scorersโ€โ€“those that answered 7 or more correctโ€“based on their media habits. The result was that โ€œhigher shares of those who report CNN (35 percent) or MSNBC (39 percent) as their primary news source [got] 7 or more right, compared to those who report mainly watching Fox News (25ย percent).โ€

4. Ground Zero Mosque. In late 2010, two scholars at the Ohio State Universityย studied public misperceptions about the so-called โ€œGround Zero Mosqueโ€โ€”and in particular, the prevalence of a series of rumors depicting those seeking to build the mosque as terrorist sympathizers, anti-American, and so on. The result? โ€œPeople who use Fox News believe more of the rumors we asked about and they believe them more strongly than those who do not.โ€ Respondents reporting a โ€œlow relianceโ€ on Fox News believed .9 rumors on average (out of 4), but for those reporting a โ€œhigh relianceโ€ on Fox News, the number increased to 1.5 out of 4.ย 

5. 2010 Election. Late last year, the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) once again singled out Fox in a survey about misinformation during the 2010 election. Out of 11 false claims studied in the survey, PIPA found that โ€œalmost dailyโ€ Fox News viewers were โ€œsignificantly more likely than those who never watched itโ€ to believe 9 of them, including the misperception that โ€œmost scientists do not agree that climate change isย occurring.โ€

Itโ€™s important to note that these studies do not prove causation. In other words, they do not prove that watching Fox makes people believe incorrect things. After all, it could be that those who are more likely to believe the incorrect things listed above are also more likely to watch Fox, to seek out Fox, etc. The causation could go in the oppositeย direction.

Still, the evidence above isย striking.

Related Posts

on

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.
on

This story was published in partnership with Gen Dread and a video version will be available online on November 16 as part of the Climate Consciousness Summit 2024, staged by the Pocket Project in...
on

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.
on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.