" 'Cool It' is a stealth attack on humanity's future"

authordefault
on

This tart quote is Tim Flannery’s devastating verdict on the new Bjorn Lomborg global warming policy attack, Cool It .

In his own bestseller, The Weather Makers:How Man Is Changing the Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth, Tim Flannery presented a carefully documented look at the forces driving climate change and the range of complications that may arise. It is at once scholarly and readable, even-handed andย chilling.

But Flannery finds that Lomborg’s approach to science and advocacy is bound less in science than in an ideology of market-economy optimism. Lomborg would have us plan for our climate future in the same way the Bush administration planned for the Iraq war: assume that everything will turn out great and make no contingency arrangements to guard against anything actually goingย wrong.

Flannery gets caught himself here in some casual bashing. For instance, he says, โ€œGlib, misleading associations mark Lomborg’sย style.โ€

But then Flannery offers this example: โ€œIn his (Lomborg’s) chapter on glaciers, he states that since ‘we’re leaving the Little Ice Age’ (which, in fact, we left long ago) it’s not surprising that glaciers are dwindling. Remarkably, he believes that is more good news, because ‘with glacial melting, rivers actually increase their water contents, especially in the summer, providing more water to many of the poorest people in the world.’ ‘It boils down to a stark choice,’ he lectures us. ‘Would we rather have more water available orย less?’โ€

It’s classic Lomborg. He celebrates the increased flow from melting glaciers now without mentioning that once the glacier is gone, its capacity to store water for summertime use will also beย gone.

Chris Mooney is right in his recent post, pointing out that we can do ourselves an injury when we get caught up in blistering arguments over the deniers’ wild, narrow, diversionary asides. But serious scientists like Flannery and Naomi Oreskes deserve praise and support for their willingness to step out from the deep cover of academia and challenge hacks like Lomborg inย public.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The premier is tossing aside the constituents who voted for her to grant favours to tech and fossil fuel executives.

The premier is tossing aside the constituents who voted for her to grant favours to tech and fossil fuel executives.
on

Hedge fund owner and media boss Jeremy Hosking has increased his oil, gas and coal shares by more than half this year.

Hedge fund owner and media boss Jeremy Hosking has increased his oil, gas and coal shares by more than half this year.
on

Join us for an April 28 discussion on how failures to properly regulate oilfield wastewater disposal now threaten public health and the environment.

Join us for an April 28 discussion on how failures to properly regulate oilfield wastewater disposal now threaten public health and the environment.
on

A string of inauthentic accounts compare clean heating technology to a โ€œlawn mower that never stopsโ€ and depict installers as โ€œenvironmental fraudstersโ€ and โ€œswindlersโ€.

A string of inauthentic accounts compare clean heating technology to a โ€œlawn mower that never stopsโ€ and depict installers as โ€œenvironmental fraudstersโ€ and โ€œswindlersโ€.