Canada Pleads Technicality on Kyoto Non-Compliance

authordefault
on

Like a criminal who beats the rap because police lost a piece of evidence, the Canadian government is trying to dodge responsibility for failing to meet its Kyoto commitments by clinging to a technicality.

Defending itself against Federal Court suit brought by Friends of the Earth, the Canadian government argued this week that Kyoto targets โ€œare not legally binding as they have not been adopted as an amendment to the Kyoto Protocol by agreement of all Parties.โ€ A rough translation might be:  George Bush isnโ€™t playing fair; why should we?

The answer, to that hypothetical question at least, is that Canada promised that it would meet its Kyoto obligations. The Canadian Parliament even passed a Private Memberโ€™s Bill last year that said it would be illegal under Canadian law to ignore Kyoto targets.

But the current government offered a dismissed sniff to that bill in court this week, announcing that the law had been โ€œnullifiedโ€ when the House of Commons later approved a Throne Speech that said Canada canโ€™t meet its Kyoto targets. This is logically problematic. Acknowledging a statement of fact โ€“ โ€œBill stole a package of sweetsโ€ โ€“ does not make the acknowledged truth legal.

And in this instance, it is not quite a fact that Canada cannot meet its Kyoto obligations. The country could still purchase carbon credits from other countries. Or Canada could commit itself to meeting more stringent emission cuts in the next round of the Kyoto treaty.

No, the Candian government was really saying: Canada WONโ€˜T meet its obligations โ€“ and now itโ€™s hired some smart lawyers to try to make that all seem okay.

Well, the Federal Court has yet to comment on the merit of the federal government excuses. But even it the court accepts the legal technicality, the damage will remain to Canadaโ€™s international reputation โ€“ and to its future credibility as a potential partner in ANY negotiation.

Related Posts

on

The pro-Trump Heartland Institute claims it spearheaded opposition to a flagship European nature law.

The pro-Trump Heartland Institute claims it spearheaded opposition to a flagship European nature law.
Analysis
on

Politicians, donors, think tanks, and media outlets in the UK and U.S. are working increasingly closely to scupper climate policies and promote fossil fuel extraction.

Politicians, donors, think tanks, and media outlets in the UK and U.S. are working increasingly closely to scupper climate policies and promote fossil fuel extraction.
on

Se debe proteger a las futuras conferencias de la โ€œintensa presiรณn que estรก ejerciendo la industriaโ€, dicen los miembros de las campaรฑas.

Se debe proteger a las futuras conferencias de la โ€œintensa presiรณn que estรก ejerciendo la industriaโ€, dicen los miembros de las campaรฑas.
on

Research finds signs of โ€œcoordinated climate obstruction effortsโ€ among oil, plastics, and agrichemical industries in social media messaging.

Research finds signs of โ€œcoordinated climate obstruction effortsโ€ among oil, plastics, and agrichemical industries in social media messaging.