The William Perry Pendley Rehabilitation Tour: Climate Change, Wild Horses, and Ethics Recusals

authordefault
on

Byย John R. Platt, The Revelator. Originally posted on The Revelator.

William Perry Pendley wants you think that whatย heย thinks doesnโ€™tย matter.

Pendley spentย four decadesย advocating for the corporate exploitation of U.S. public lands. He now serves the Trump administration as the acting director of the Bureau of Land Management, the agency responsible for much of those same publicย lands.

Over the years Pendley, a self-styled โ€œSagebrush Rebel,โ€ has pushed for the wholesale divestment of public lands from federal control, denied the existence of climate change and the hole in the ozone layer, denigrated the press, and called illegal immigrants a โ€œcancer,โ€ among otherย radical, extremist positions.

But now heโ€™d have you believe that those actions and opinions no longerย matter.

โ€œMy personal opinions are irrelevant,โ€ Pendley said during an on-stageย panelย moderated by Juliet Eilperin ofย The Washington Postย earlier this monthย at the Society of Environmental Journalists annual conference in Fort Collins, Colorado. โ€œI have a new job now,โ€ he told the audience. โ€œIโ€™m a zealous advocate for my client. My client is the American people, and my bosses are the president of the United States and Secretary Bernhardt. So what I thought, what I wrote, what I did in the past is irrelevant. I have orders, I have laws to obey, and I intend to doย that.โ€

That appearance represented just one part of what appears to be a broader media strategy to rehabilitate Pendleyโ€™s image, includingย softball interviewsย for multiple publications and anย op-ed forย The Denver Postย on the eve of theย conference.

So what dominates Pendleyโ€™s opinions now? Well, he thinks the worst thing facing Americaโ€™s public lands right now isnโ€™t climate change โ€” it is, in his opinion,ย wild horses.

But how would he know? During his SEJ appearance, throughout which he deflected a barrage of tough questions from the journalists in the audience, he admitted that BLMโ€™s regional directors had yet to brief him about the already obvious local effects of climate change on public lands, many of which were cited by other panelists during theย discussion.

I asked Pendley why he hasnโ€™t been briefed on this, and if there were other issues on which he had also not beenย briefed.

His response: โ€œWell, yeah, thereโ€™s a ton of topics I havenโ€™t been briefed on, and one of the reasons is myย recusals.โ€

Pendley, you see, has a 17-page list of ethical recusals โ€” nearly 60 companies and groups that he used to represent in his role as president of the Mountain States Legal Foundation, an organization โ€œdedicated to individual liberty, the right to own and use property, limited government, and free enterpriseโ€ which the Center for Media and Democracyย callsย โ€œa training ground for a number of attorneys most active in the anti-environmentalย movement.โ€

These recusals include oil companies, energy companies and the National Mining Association, among many others. According to BLM ethical guidelines, Pendley is restricted from actions at the agency that would overlap with the interests of his prior clients, usually for a period of twoย years.

In other words, heโ€™s not being educated about the issues that define his roles and responsibilities as head of the BLM, and heโ€™s not ethically allowed to do much of that jobย anyway.

Pendley did continue to answer my question by saying that heโ€™s just been cleared to start receiving briefings on a number of issues, but would not commit to saying when those briefings โ€” most notably the ones on climate change โ€” would occur. โ€œWhen it pops up on my schedule,โ€ he said about thatย timeline.

He didnโ€™t seem too concerned, though. After all, heโ€™s got horses to worry about โ€” not to mention oil companies. Although Pendleyโ€™s list of recusals remains long, he obviously still finds himself more on the side of maintaining oil-drilling rights and jobs than the rights of the wildlife orย climatory systems that depend on public lands. He called Democratic presidential candidatesโ€™ โ€œKeep It in the Groundโ€ pledges to stop new drilling โ€œabsolutely insaneโ€ and characterized oil drilling as a matter of โ€œlife or deathโ€ for westernย communities.

He also, in a question from Eilperin about the role of recreation on public land, conflated BLMโ€™s role as a leasing agent of extraction rights with the companies doing the actual drilling and other activities. โ€œWe manage 245 million acres of land, 10 percent of the nationโ€™s land mass, and we have a multiple use directiveโ€ฆ We drill for oil. We mine coal. We cut trees. We allow ranchers to graze their cattle and their sheep on our lands. Yourย lands.โ€

Regardless of his past or present positions, the real measure of a person comes from their deeds, not their words. And Pendleyโ€™s rehabilitation tour isnโ€™t all talk. It also obviously serves to build support for the ongoing plan toย move much of the BLMย away from Washington, DC, and into the West โ€” a changeย opposed by BLM staffย themselves but long supported and dreamed of by Pendley and other anti-federal appointees in the Trump administration. That plan grows closer every day, and when it happens many experts predict that federal control over public lands could begin toย erode.

And that might prove to be Pendleyโ€™s most defining statement ofย all.

This work is licensed under aย Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

Main image:ย Pendley speaks at the Society of Environmental Journalists conference. Credit:ย @BLMNational/Twitter

authordefault

Related Posts

Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.
on

The Heartland Institute, which questions human-made climate change, has established a new branch in London.

The Heartland Institute, which questions human-made climate change, has established a new branch in London.
on

At McNeese State Universityโ€™s LNG center, โ€œwe want to ensure that our LNG industry has a major say in research direction,โ€ one of its project leaders wrote.

At McNeese State Universityโ€™s LNG center, โ€œwe want to ensure that our LNG industry has a major say in research direction,โ€ one of its project leaders wrote.
on

But experts say these โ€œabusiveโ€ lawsuits, which are designed to demoralize and drain resources from activists, should be fought, not feared.

But experts say these โ€œabusiveโ€ lawsuits, which are designed to demoralize and drain resources from activists, should be fought, not feared.