Tory Net Zero Chief Calls for Climate Deniers to Vet UK Energy Policies

Claire Coutinho endorsed several figures linked to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a group that questions established climate science.
Adam Barnett - new white crop
on
Claire Coutinho, Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero. Credit: Martyn Wheatley CCHQ / Parsons Media (CC BY 2.0)

Shadow Net Zero Secretary Claire Coutinho has publicly urged the government to invite climate crisis deniers to scrutinise its policies. 

In a post on X.com on 12 January, the Conservative Partyโ€™s energy and net zero lead urged Labour to โ€œbring inโ€ a group of well-known opponents of climate action to โ€œred teamโ€ its analysis of renewable energy costs.ย 

Three of the four people she named have worked for the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), the UKโ€™s principal climate science denial group, or its campaign arm Net Zero Watch.

They include Andrew Montford, director of Net Zero Watch, and consultant Kathryn Porter, who has links to the oil and gas industry. 

DeSmog revealed in September that the Conservatives had received ยฃ7.2 million from funders or directors of the GWPF over the past two decades. 

Coutinho, who was net zero secretary from August 2023 until July 2024 under the last government, also shared claims by Porter that the UK almost faced energy blackouts earlier this month โ€“ claims that have been debunked by experts. 

New Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, who took over the position in November, has described herself as a โ€œnet zero scepticโ€ and has suggested that she may scrap the UKโ€™s commitment to achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

As DeSmog has reported, in her first two months in post Badenoch has hired a policy chief who has publicly attacked net zero, and has met with prominent U.S. climate deniers.

During the Tory leadership contest, Badenoch received donations and use of office space from Neil Record, chairman of Net Zero Watch and life vice president of the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), a think tank that received funding from the oil major BP every year from 1967 until at least 2018.ย 

As revealed by DeSmog, Badenoch also received a ยฃ10,000 donation during the contest from a director of the fossil fuel giant Chevron.

Climate scientists warned last week that 2024 was the hottest year on record and that global temperatures are โ€œdangerously closeโ€ to breaking the 1.5C global warming targetย set by the flagship 2015 Paris Agreement.

The UNโ€™s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the worldโ€™s leading climate science body, has stated that failure to limit global warming to 1.5C โ€“ by achieving net zero by 2050 โ€“ will lead to increasingly frequent and dangerous extreme weather events. These include heatwaves, droughts, wildfires, heavy precipitation and flooding.

โ€œI do not recall Coutinho using a red team approach to test her policies,โ€ said Bob Ward, policy and communications director Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics. โ€œPerhaps she has already forgotten that she was energy secretary until about six months ago.โ€

A โ€˜red teamโ€™ approach involvesย simulating attacks on an organisationโ€™s systems or modes of analysis in order to test their effectiveness.ย 

Ward added that Coutinho โ€œseems to have more time now to spend on social media, where she has obviously seen some people attacking government energy policy, and decided that they would make a good red team. I think the government would be better off seeking advice from actual experts.โ€

Coutinhoโ€™s Climate โ€˜Red Teamโ€™

Coutinhoโ€™s post on 12 January claimed that the Labour government was underestimating the cost of renewable energy. She suggested that if Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband โ€œreally cared about cheap energyโ€ he would โ€œbring inโ€ Kathryn Porter, Steve Loftus, David Turver and Andrew Montford โ€œto red team the analysisโ€.ย 

She added: โ€œBecause bad data = bad policy = expensive energy.โ€

Montford is the director of Net Zero Watch, which has urged the government to โ€œrecommit to fossil fuelsโ€, including โ€œa new fleet of coal fired power stationsโ€, and has called for renewable energy from wind and solar to be โ€œwound down completelyโ€.

Montford himself has cast doubt on the climate crisis. In a 2021 Spectator article, he wrote: โ€œAs I watch the snow blow past my window, itโ€™s hard not to scoff at the idea of a โ€˜climate emergencyโ€™.โ€

Last March, Montford told GB News that Labour and the Tories were โ€œwedded to the religious dogma that we have to decarbonise the economyโ€, and are โ€œgoing to run the country into the ground unless they are forced to turn backโ€.

Another expert tagged by Coutinho was Kathryn Porter. As DeSmog reported in June 2023, Porterโ€™s energy consultancy Watt-Logic works with โ€œbusinesses with projects across the electricity, gas and oil industriesโ€. According to Porterโ€™s website, these include โ€œclients with conventional energy assets including gas-fired power stations, gas storage, upstream oil and gas production and [Liquid Natural Gas]โ€.

Porter has written blog posts that have cast doubt on climate science. In a 2017 post, she wrote that โ€œclimate models overstate global warmingโ€. In fact, climate models accurately predict global temperature rises, with observed warming reflecting scientific forecasts.ย 

She also wrote that โ€œthe counter-argument to current climate change orthodoxy is that rising levels of atmospheric CO2 are the result of, and not the cause of, rises in global temperatureโ€.

The IPCC has said that carbon dioxide โ€œis responsible for most of global warmingโ€ since the late 19th century, while IPCC scientists have stressed that โ€œit is a statement of fact, we cannot be any more certain; it is unequivocal and indisputable that humans are warming the planetโ€.

Porter has also cited research by the GWPF on her blog, and in November 2023 wrote a report for the climate denial group about nuclear energy. 

The GWPFโ€™s director Benny Peiser has suggested it would be โ€œextraordinary anyone should think there is a climate crisisโ€, while the group has also expressed the view that carbon dioxide has been mis-characterised as pollution, when in fact it is a โ€œbenefit to the planetโ€.

Last week, Coutinho shared an article by Porter claiming that the UK had come โ€œvery closeโ€ to a blackout in early January, citing the National Energy System Operator (NESO), previously part of the National Grid. However, as pointed out by Jess Ralston, head of energy at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), NESO never said there was a blackout risk. 

Coutinho also urged Miliband to consult Steve Loftus, who describes himself as a โ€œbusiness ownerโ€ on the โ€œcentre-rightโ€ of politics who provides โ€œunbiased talk about the state of UK water and energyโ€.

Loftus is a prominent critic of net zero policies on X.com. In April he posted: โ€œNet Zero is a regressive policy. Itโ€™s less energy. Less travel. Less food. Less industry.โ€

Despite Coutinhoโ€™s suggestion that Loftus could help to scrutinise Milibandโ€™s ideas, he replied under her post: โ€œI can save myself the potential journey and just tell him now that all his plans are impossible and dangerous.โ€

Loftus told DeSmog he accepts that human-caused climate change is real, and that he comments on energy rather than climate policies. 

David Turver is another active anti-net zero poster on X.com and writes a newsletter offering โ€œfundamental analysis of energy policy and net zeroโ€.

On 2 January, he claimed that climate science is โ€œjust junk ideology given a fig leaf of respectability by academics and institutions who have their noses in the trough.โ€  

A few days later, Turver said: โ€œMiliband and his supporters are among the most dangerous people in Britain. Net zero is killing the economy.โ€ 

The same week he posted: โ€œEd Miliband, when will you end your obsession with net zero and get coal back on the grid?โ€

Coal is the most carbon-intensive fossil fuel. In 2021, the International Energy Agency reported that coal power plants still produced a fifth of all global greenhouse gas emissions.

Last July, Turver wrote a report for Net Zero Watch attacking the Climate Change Committee (CCC), the governmentโ€™s independent advisory body on net zero. 

Coutinho has additional ties to the GWPF, its funders, and other climate science deniers. While serving as net zero secretary in January 2024, she received a ยฃ2,000 donation from Lord Hintze, a Tory donor and one of the few known funders of the GWPF.

The same month, Coutinho met and praised Howard Cox, the then Reform UK candidate for London mayor, who campaigns against fuel taxes and low-emission zones. In 2022, Cox said: โ€œI am now even more convinced man is not responsible for global warming.โ€

During last yearโ€™s general election campaign, Coutinho attacked what she called Labourโ€™s โ€œmad plans to decarbonise the grid in just six yearsโ€ and its alleged desire to โ€œshut down our thriving oil and gas sectorโ€. 

ECIU has estimated that the net zero economy supported 765,700 full time equivalent jobs in the UK in 2022-23, equal to nearly 3 percent of total employment, and contributed ยฃ74 billion in economic output.ย 

The Conservative Party, Coutinho, Net Zero Watch, the GWPF, Porter, and Turver were approached for comment. 

Adam Barnett - new white crop
Adam Barnett is DeSmog's UK News Reporter. He is a former Staff Writer at Left Foot Forward and BBC Local Democracy Reporter.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Badenoch, a self-described โ€˜net zero skeptic,โ€™ called Poilievre โ€˜a new friend and allyโ€™ in December.

Badenoch, a self-described โ€˜net zero skeptic,โ€™ called Poilievre โ€˜a new friend and allyโ€™ in December.
on

Oil company was storing a fraction of advertised amount of CO2 at offshore project, data shows.

Oil company was storing a fraction of advertised amount of CO2 at offshore project, data shows.
Analysis
on

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?