Has Canadian Environment Minister Had a Climate Change Epiphany?

authordefault
on

Enviro Minister Rona AmbroseThe National Post, through which the Canadian Conservative government has been floating all its climate change policy trial balloons lately, now suggests that โ€œTories to regulate industries for CO2.โ€

This would be fabulous news if it were true, and not just โ€œpositive spin on a made-in-Canada solution.โ€

ย But this comment, by Pierre Alvarez, president of the Canadian Association Petroleum Producers (CAPP), suggests the government is a long way from rustling feathers in the Canadian oil patch. Alvarez is quoted in the Post story saying, โ€œWe have been going forward on the assumption that CO2, as well as toxics and other pollutants, would be covered in the (Tories’ new) plan.โ€ But he said he did not necessarily believe that regulation meant a cap on emissions. โ€œYou may have to have targets but it does not necessarily mean a cap, and certainly not a hard cap.โ€

You can imagine a soft cap, one that the industry could wear backwards or throw in the closet when it gets warm out.

Related Posts

on

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.
Series: MAGA
Opinion
on

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.
on

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.
on

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.