DeSmog

NRSP's Tom Harris Sucker Punches a Rookie

authordefault
on

Brooke Hogemann is a delightful young woman. Two years out of journalism school at Mount Royal College in Calgary, she has her first newspaper job at the Airdrie Echo, a little weekly in a bedroom community in the Alberta foothills.

In a conversation with a big-city interrogator (that would be me) she says that she’s the environment reporter, but she adds quickly that she covers lots of things. It’s the way of the world in small-town papers.

What she doesn’t say – what she doesn’t have to say if you read her story from yesterday – is that she wasn’t ready for the sandbagging that she got from Tom Harris, Executive Director of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (see, NRSP: Not Real Science People).

Harris told her that the NRSP is all about accuracy. He said: “We get scientists to look at different policies and we get them to say what is real.”

He told her: “The scientists on our team are the purest of the environmentalists, because they’ve spent their life researching it.”

He didn’t tell her that his “scientists” – “the purest of the environmentalists” – had to fold up the tent on their last phoney organization, the Friends of Science, after the Globe and Mail revealed that it was an oil industry front.

He didn’t tell her that his chief “scientist” – the tireless Dr. Tim Ball – got his degree in historical geography and has barely published a word of science in his unspectacular career. In fact, Ball, who also spoke to Hogemann, but didn’t get quoted (“He didn’t really add anything that Tom hadn’t already said.”) never mentioned that he is locked in a lawsuit with another newspaper (the Calgary Herald) which accidentally revealed the lies that Ball has been in the habit of telling about his own resume.

Hogemann says, without apology, that she was just doing her job. She’s written other stories about climate change and she “decided to put in a different opinion that I haven’t seen before.”

Regardless of how the story reads, she also says, “I wasn’t taking them at face value. (What she wrote is) just their opinion. Whether it’s right or wrong is not up to me to decide.”

I disagree. I think that journalists have a responsibility to make sure the people they quote are credible. But Hogemann says, “At the end of the day, I have to trust that the people I’m interviewing are telling me the truth of what they believe.”

Like I said, a delightful young woman. I don’t know how Tom Harris sleeps.

Related Posts

on

A new report shows global spending on carbon capture and hydrogen subsidies "failed to make a dent in carbon emissions" after 50 years of research and development.

A new report shows global spending on carbon capture and hydrogen subsidies "failed to make a dent in carbon emissions" after 50 years of research and development.
on

The Tory leadership candidate has criticised the UK’s net zero targets while accepting donations from fossil fuel investors and climate denial funders.

The Tory leadership candidate has criticised the UK’s net zero targets while accepting donations from fossil fuel investors and climate denial funders.
on

A flagship climate scheme will cost taxpayers billions, with no guarantee of a meaningful impact on emissions.

A flagship climate scheme will cost taxpayers billions, with no guarantee of a meaningful impact on emissions.
on

Rupert Lowe has been campaigning against climate action while owning a heat pump supplier.

Rupert Lowe has been campaigning against climate action while owning a heat pump supplier.