Bush tries new spin on global warming, but retains bias for growth over emission controls

authordefault
on

To many, the Bush Administration has been scrambling to appear more sensitive lately to perceptions the U.S. government either doesnโ€™t take global warming seriously โ€” or doesnโ€™t take it seriouslyย enough.

During the current U.S.-sponsored conference on climate change, for example, the president urged the worldโ€™s worst polluters, including the United States, to set goals for curbing emissions. He also proposed creation of an international fund to finance research into clean-energyย technology.

The conference was attended by 16 countries responsible for more than 80 per cent of global carbon emissions. Officials from Australia, Britain, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Russia and South Africa were attending, as well as European Union and UN climate-changeย officials.

Rather than seize the opportunity by calling for binding controls, Bush suggested each nation should decide for itself how far it wanted to go โ€“ without stunting economic growth, ofย course.

In a last-gasp effort at damage control, the White House circulated a pocket-size handbook aimed at dispelling various โ€œmythsโ€ about U.S. environmental policy. But trying to dispel widely held notions is a far cry from taking action on globalย warming.

The U.S. alone spews up to one-quarter of the worldโ€™s total annual output of carbon emissions. China is the worldโ€™s largest nation in terms of both population and pollution. India is set to overtake China. Both were on hand when Bush took the podium to reiterate his tiresome call for voluntaryย action.

Another opportunity lost to histrionics and politicalย posturing.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Opinion
on

The volume of 'net zero' messaging โ€” a concept that can sometimes feel very abstract โ€”must be recalibrated to foreground the vital conversation about immediate impacts and resilience.

The volume of 'net zero' messaging โ€” a concept that can sometimes feel very abstract โ€”must be recalibrated to foreground the vital conversation about immediate impacts and resilience.
Analysis
on

A ruling that TotalEnergies misled consumers with inflated climate claims is the first court judgment against the fossil fuel industryโ€™s net zero narrative.

A ruling that TotalEnergies misled consumers with inflated climate claims is the first court judgment against the fossil fuel industryโ€™s net zero narrative.
on

In a major conflict of interest, FMinus study shows nationโ€™s climate action taking a back seat to Big Oilโ€™s lobbying playbook.

In a major conflict of interest, FMinus study shows nationโ€™s climate action taking a back seat to Big Oilโ€™s lobbying playbook.
Analysis
on

Food and farming companies will claim agriculture is the solution to the climate crisis at the Brazil summit โ€” even though food drives a third of global warming.

Food and farming companies will claim agriculture is the solution to the climate crisis at the Brazil summit โ€” even though food drives a third of global warming.