Highway dustup in British Columbia highlights gap between talk and action on climate change

authordefault
onMar 10, 2008 @ 11:13 PDT

One only has to go a few miles northwest of B.C.โ€™s capital in Victoria to see what governments are really doing about globalย warming.

While provincial Finance Minister Carole Taylor was finalizing her โ€œgo greenโ€ budget, governments at the federal, provincial and local level were taking steps that guarantee sprawl, gridlock and greenhouse emissions will continue toย spiral.

Since April, 2007, peaceful protesters have tried to save an area of old-growth forest from becoming a highway interchange that would give developers easier access to a mountain, where they mean to replace a natural forest with roads, highrises and commercialย buildings.

The dispute peaked recently when 60-odd Royal Canadian Mounted Police pounced with dogs and assault rifles to roust six tree-sit demonstrators engaged in a non-violent protest. There were three arrests, and even as the police attack was underway, crews began felling trees for the hugeย clover-leaf.

The reasons given for stopping a road and saving trees are laudable, especially in this time of escalating climate change โ€“ to protect First Nationsโ€™ sacred ground, to arrest sprawl and to expand transportation options, amongย others.

A few local politicians โ€“ federal, provincial and local โ€“ have criticized the harsh treatment of the protesters, but none has said anything about stopping the interchange or reining in the growth and development that drive globalย warming.

The interchange site is in Langford, one of a dozen municipalities in B.C.โ€™s capital region. It was Langfordโ€™s mayor who inflamed the issue by calling in the RCMP swat team. Then he followed up by instructing municipal lawyers to consider legal action against the pennilessย protesters.

Now, in addition to that pointless expenditure of tax dollars, Langford is borrowing $25 million to fund the bulk of the $32 million projected cost of theย interchange!

You are what you do, according to the old adage. And what Langford is doing here is abusing taxpayers by subsidizing infrastructure expansion for developers. In a sense, so are the feds, who are ultimately responsible for the hysterical behavior of the RCMP.

Nor should we forget the province, which enjoyed favorable reportage recently for introducing a new tax on gasoline and home heatingย fuel.

A new tax, however, isnโ€™t a climate-change plan. Budget documents, for example, show fossil-fuel consumption is expected to rise in the immediate term. Also, provincial subsidies for oil and gas exploration are increasing to more than $300 million this year. So the trough just keeps gettingย bigger.

Stanford entomologist Paul Erlich once remarked to me that โ€œPoliticians go where they are shoved.โ€ Right now the big shove comes mainly from the corporate elite of big oil and gas, auto manufacturers, andย developers.

Thatโ€™s how we got into this fix and itโ€™s whatโ€™s keeping usย there.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onNov 14, 2025 @ 07:04 PST

Their access to the summit is proof that Big Oil still holds "a dangerous sway" over the climate process, campaigners say.

Their access to the summit is proof that Big Oil still holds "a dangerous sway" over the climate process, campaigners say.
onNov 13, 2025 @ 21:01 PST

Delegationโ€™s composition consistent with new KBPO report revealingย this yearโ€™s U.N. climate talks have the largest number of fossil fuel lobbyists to date.

Delegationโ€™s composition consistent with new KBPO report revealingย this yearโ€™s U.N. climate talks have the largest number of fossil fuel lobbyists to date.
onNov 13, 2025 @ 06:22 PST

Labour government accused of being โ€œcomplicit in the fossil fuel industryโ€™s conquest of the COP processโ€.

Labour government accused of being โ€œcomplicit in the fossil fuel industryโ€™s conquest of the COP processโ€.
Analysis
onNov 12, 2025 @ 12:15 PST

Our changing climate will produce winners and losers. Canada should look to the Global South for a winning strategy.

Our changing climate will produce winners and losers. Canada should look to the Global South for a winning strategy.