Nuclear Energy: Expensive, Dangerous, Not Cost-Effective

authordefault
on

Amory Lovins and Imran Sheikh have penned a new report on nuclear energy as a fossil fuel option, concluding thatย  nuclear is still dangerous and complicated, not particularly reliable, creates a pollution problem that lasts for many millennia and is therefore a waste of money that could be spent more productively on renewableย energy.

Perhaps most devastating to the free market fans, Lovins and Sheikh note that โ€œnuclear power plants are unfinanceable in the private capital market because of their excessive costs and financial risks and the high uncertainty ofย both.โ€

โ€œDuring the nuclear revival now allegedly underway, no new nuclear project on earth has been financed by private risk capital, chosen by an open decision process, nor bid into the worldโ€™s innumerable power markets and auctions. No old nuclear plant has been resold at a value consistent with a market case for building a newย one.โ€

The hat tip here goes to Steve Milloy, Junk Scientist extraordinaire and unreconstructed PR guy, who pointed to the Lovins’ paper in a hyperventilating screed on the Fox News wire. Thanks Steve.ย ย 

Related Posts

on

The key facts about one of Nigel Farageโ€™s closest allies.

The key facts about one of Nigel Farageโ€™s closest allies.
Analysis
on

Itโ€™s a massive subsidy to Equinor, the Norwegian oil company behind the Bay du Nord offshore oil project.

Itโ€™s a massive subsidy to Equinor, the Norwegian oil company behind the Bay du Nord offshore oil project.
on

A new childrenโ€™s book by a Chevron-backed clean energy venture paints a sympathetic portrait of coal, oil, and gas.

A new childrenโ€™s book by a Chevron-backed clean energy venture paints a sympathetic portrait of coal, oil, and gas.
Analysis
on

Fossil fuel interests and climate science deniers have been leading the charge for more drilling.

Fossil fuel interests and climate science deniers have been leading the charge for more drilling.