EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

Brand strategist Dean Aragรณn will have a leading voice at the Association of National Advertisers.

Brand strategist Dean Aragรณn will have a leading voice at the Association of National Advertisers.
Analysis
on

Some questions Prime Minister Mark Carney should ask before pushing ahead with natural gas projects.

Some questions Prime Minister Mark Carney should ask before pushing ahead with natural gas projects.
on

New study shows top producers responsible for more carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions than all of oil giant Saudi Arabia.

New study shows top producers responsible for more carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions than all of oil giant Saudi Arabia.
on

Pathways Allianceย presence was minimal, indicating potential retooling for well-advertised CCS project.

Pathways Allianceย presence was minimal, indicating potential retooling for well-advertised CCS project.