In june of 2009, a story surfaced about the alleged suppression by the US EPA of information related to climate change. The source of the information was reported to be one Dr. Alan Carlin, who, although a real EPA analyst, was in fact, an economist, not a scientist.
Distortions of the story, from the usual sources, began almost immediately.
Fossil fuel interests are deploying unprecedented strategies to hide evidence of companies’ deception and block liability lawsuits before they reach trial.
Federal lawsuit alleges EPA’s rules on ethylene oxide and chloroprene emissions rely on weak industry estimates rather than real-world data on risks to health.
The host committee for the Republican National Convention names the Canadian pipeline company as a 'partner' on its website.
The French communications giant had previously staked its brand on its climate-friendly credentials.
Clearing the PR Pollution
Sections
Databases
Topics
Clearing the PR Pollution
Follow
Website by SeriousOtters