Nature Weighs in on Email Controversy

authordefault
on

The journal Nature, unquestionably one of the most credible sources in science today, weighed in yesterday with an editorial on the hacked email controversy. Itโ€™sย conclusion:

โ€œIn the end, what the UEA (University of East Anglia) e-mails really show is that scientists are human beings โ€” and that unrelenting opposition to their work can goad them to the limits of tolerance, and tempt them to act in ways that undermine scientific values. Yet it is precisely in such circumstances that researchers should strive to act and communicate professionally, and make their data and methods available to others, lest they provide their worst critics with ammunition. After all, the pressures the UEA e-mailers experienced may be nothing compared with what will emerge as the United States debates a climate bill next year, and denialists use every means at their disposal to undermine trust in scientists andย science.โ€

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

Partner firmโ€™s pivot to wood-chipping may yet harm forests, campaigners warn.

Partner firmโ€™s pivot to wood-chipping may yet harm forests, campaigners warn.
on

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.
on

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€
Series: MAGA
on

Paying for social license is 'no substitute for solving environmental problems,' say critics.

Paying for social license is 'no substitute for solving environmental problems,' say critics.