Prentice to the World: I Told You So! Tar Sands Extraction is Less Badder Than Offshore Drilling!

authordefault
on

What did you learn from the recent oil spill off the coast ofย Louisiana?

Canadian Environment Minster Jim Prentice learned that extraction from the tar sands is less risky than offshoreย drilling.

โ€œI think itโ€™s always been clear that the oil sands provide a safe, stable, secure supply of energy and they need to be developed in an environmentally responsible way. The risks associated with the oil sands, the environmental risks, are significantly different than, and probably less than the kind of risks associated with offshore drilling,โ€ heย said.โ€

Of course, he remains vigilant to the mandate of his office as, you know, the Environmentย Minister:

โ€œBut we still have to be on our game in terms of the environmental regulations for the oil sands asย well.โ€

Sure, the risks of offshore drilling are significant, and they are different from those tied to tar sands extraction. Prentice, though, is either oblivious or negligent in his failure to mention the risks associated with the growth in atmospheric co2 concentrations that will accompany increased output from the Alberta tar sands. Indeed, if we chose to engage Prenticeโ€™s clumsy comparison, we could say that those risks are likely far worse than the ones associated with offshore drillingย accidents.

The problem here is that full exploitation of currently available reserves of oil, coal, and natural gas will already take us well over the 450ppm threshold that most experts agree gives the best chance of avoiding catastrophic global warming of more than 2 degrees. Some stuff needs to stay in the ground, includingย a chunk of coal and offshore oil reserves.ย So too will most non-traditional fossil fuelย sources like the tar sands,ย which are expensive and also require large energy inputs toย extract.

James Hansen has a visualization of that challenge from a 2008 paperย (this version actually from his more recentย presentations):

Adding further to the intellectual depth of this conversation, Prentice hopes Canadians will become tar sandsย evangelists:

โ€œItโ€™s important that we as Albertans continue to go to Washington, that we as Canadians explain in the United States and elsewhere โ€ฆ that we are developing the oil sands up to the highest possible environmental standards. We need to communicate thatย fact.โ€

Prentice and the Conservative Party have apparently transformed major Canadian political offices into K-Street style firms that do PR work on behalf of the tar sands industry. Reporter Bill Graveland, who wrote the article without mentioning climate change once, and who closes the article with an โ€œit couldnโ€™t happen hereโ€ reference to the Canadian offshore drilling moratorium, observes this PR offensive, but awkwardly enlists himself anyways, writing this clunker of aย graf:

Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach and Environment Minister Rob Renner have been fighting an international public relations war against heavyweight enviro-critics and celebrities, including National Geographic, the Audubon Society and Hollywood kingpin director Jamesย Cameron.

Those Hollywood evil-doers, out to get the tar sandsย again.

Related Posts

on

Nigel Farage and his colleagues have close ties to the autocratic petrostate.

Nigel Farage and his colleagues have close ties to the autocratic petrostate.
on

The European Parliament has โ€œa legal and moral obligation to reject these dangerous proposalsโ€, according to Dutch Left MEP Anja Hazekamp.

The European Parliament has โ€œa legal and moral obligation to reject these dangerous proposalsโ€, according to Dutch Left MEP Anja Hazekamp.
on

Itโ€™s an energy agenda seemingly at odds with the prime ministerโ€™s previous stated commitments to addressing climate change.

Itโ€™s an energy agenda seemingly at odds with the prime ministerโ€™s previous stated commitments to addressing climate change.
on

Anonymous group of senior executives say major ad agencies are โ€œenabling harm rather than doing good.โ€

Anonymous group of senior executives say major ad agencies are โ€œenabling harm rather than doing good.โ€