UPDATE: Sandra Bullock has issued a statement through her publicist sayingย that,
โMs. Bullock was originally contacted through her attorney to be a part of the PSA in order to promote awareness of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. At no time was she made aware that any organization, oil company or otherwise had influence over Women of the Storm or its message. We have immediately asked for her participation in the PSA be removed until the facts can be determined. Her commitment to the Gulf region has been apparent for many years and she will continue to pursue opportunities that will bring awareness and support to the plight of the Gulfย region.โ
A group of oil companies including BP, Shell, ExxonMobil, Citgo, Chevron and other polluters are using a front group called โAmericaโs WETLAND Foundationโ and a Louisiana womenโs group called Women of the Storm to spread the message that U.S. taxpayers should pay for the damage caused by BP to Gulf Coast wetlands, and that the reckless offshore oil industry should continue drilling for the โwholesale sustainabilityโ of the region.
Using the age-old PR trick of featuring celebrity messengers to attract public attention, Americaโs Wetland Foundation is spreading a petition accompanied by a video starring Sandra Bullock, Dave Matthews, Lenny Kravitz, Emeril Lagassi, John Goodman, Harry Shearer, Peyton and Eli Manning, Drew Brees and others.
The video urges petition signers to โBe The Oneโ to demand the government devise and fully fund a plan to restore the Gulf. There is no mention that BP, Halliburton, Transocean, Cameron, or any other oil industry player โbe the oneโ to pay for the damage done to the Gulf. Why call on the government to once again foot the bill for this dirty industryโs reckless behavior?
Perhaps the celebrities featured in the groupโs videos are unaware of AWFโs true intent, and signed up thinking that they were helping the Gulf Coast cause in the wake of the BP gusher. But under the surface it sure looks like they are being used as pawns to lure the public into the oil industryโs corner, ensuring that taxpayers pick up the tab for much of the damage caused by BP et al to the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf Coast communities, economies, and the environment.
The celebrity video announcement leads viewers to RestoreTheGulf.com where a curious reader would learn that a group called Women of the Storm is behind the effort. But a click through to the โsponsorsโ page reveals that this effort is actually led by Americaโs Wetland Foundation, which is funded chiefly by the same oil companies who have ruined the Gulf and endangered the planet with their global warmingย emissions.
The Americaโs WETLAND Foundation (AWF) was launched in 2002 with primary support from Shell Oil and a host of other oil companies. AWF is run by the PR shop Marmillion+Company, whose founder previously served as a PR manager at ARCO and staffer to various GOPers. According to the Washington Post:
โShell Oil, worried about its offshore drilling platforms, put up several million dollars for a PR campaign to rebrand Louisianaโs marshes as โAmericaโs Wetland.โโ
A quick look at the sponsors of Americaโs WETLAND Foundation reveals the oily underpinnings of this greenwashing campaign, with Shell serving as โWorld Sponsor,โ and a long list of oil companies, the American Petroleum Institute and other polluting interests who back the group financially as well.
Founded in January 2006 in response to the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina, Women of the Storm might seem like a truly grassroots organization to the casual observer. Is it possible that they never figured out that the oil companies behind Americaโs Wetland Foundation had an ulterior motive in โpartneringโ with their group – to greenwash the oil industryโs efforts to stick taxpayers with the bill for damage caused by drilling activities in the Gulf? Perhaps Women of the Storm were willing to take any help they could get, given the horrible response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita by the Bush Administration.
Anne Milling, founder of Women of the Storm, says that the organization has never received a penny directly from BP or any other major oil company, although she did acknowledge Women of the Storm received advisory assistance from some of these entities when originally launching the project after Hurricane Katrina. Mrs. Milling was unapologetic when asked about the prominent placement of the Americaโs Wetland Foundation banner on the groupโs website and its various partnerships with the oil-backed group. She sees nothing wrong with AWFโs cozy relationship with the same oil and gas giants that are partly responsible for the coastal wetlands degradation that is the focus of her groupโs concern.
Why? Perhaps because she is married to R. King Milling, the chairman of Americaโs Wetland Foundation, Mrs. Milling sees nothing wrong with the oil connections.
Americaโs Wetland Foundation and Women of the Storm are partners in another affiliated campaign called โAmericaโs Energy Coastโ whose tag line is โShore Up, Fuel The Nation.โ
Last fall, Americaโs Energy Coast released a white paper called Region at Risk: Preventing the Loss of Vital National Assets [PDF], which called on Congress and the Obamaย administration
โto resolve the maze of bureaucratic roadblocks that threaten the long-term sustainability of region.โ
The AWFโs โAmericaโs Energy Coastโ white paper lays out what the oil-funded campaign is primarily concerned withย protecting:
โAtโฉ riskโฉ isโฉ an engine โฉthatโฉ fuels,โฉ feedsโฉ andโฉ supportsโฉ theโฉ Americanโฉ economy.โฉ Thisโฉ isโฉ theโฉ nationโsโฉ energyโฉ corridorโฉ thatโฉ providesโฉ 90%โฉ of โฉtheโฉ domestic โฉoffshore โฉoilโฉ andโฉ gasโฉ supplyโฉ and โฉis โฉtied โฉto โฉ50% โฉof โฉthe โฉnationโs โฉrefining โฉcapacity.โ
Never mind the pelicans and dolphins, this is all about oil production. In language that demonstrates fully the bastardization of the word โsustainabilityโ by polluting interests, the paperย suggests:
โโฆourโฉ nationโฉ does โฉnotโฉ fullyโฉ appreciate โฉtheโฉ benefits โฉderived โฉfromโฉ these โฉworking โฉwetlands. โฆ โฉThe โฉongoingโฉ debate โฉat โฉthe โฉnational โฉlevel โฉon โฉthe โฉbest โฉuse โฉof โฉtheโฉ regionโsโฉ naturalโฉ resourcesโฉ hasโฉ failed โฉtoโฉ recognize โฉtheโฉ urgentโฉ needโฉ forโฉ comprehensiveโฉ solutions โฉtoโฉ theโฉ challengeโฉ ofโฉ wholesale โฉsustainability.โฉโ
โWholesale sustainability?โ And by that the AWF apparentlyย means:
โโฆโฉno โฉgreater โฉthreat โฉto โฉsustainabilityโฉ exists โฉthan theโฉ threat โฉofโฉ inaction โฉorโฉ theโฉ mazeโฉ ofโฉ governmentalโฉ processes thatโฉ preventโฉ efficientโฉ solutions.โฉโฉ โฆ โฉthe โฉlong-termโฉ survivalโฉ andโฉ successโฉ of โฉthisโฉ region โฉisโฉ ultimatelyโฉ tiedโฉ to โฉlarge-scaleโฉ Federalโฉ recognition โฉand โฉsupport.โฉโ โฆ โAmong โฉtheโฉ mostโฉ challengingโฉ obstaclesโฉ toโฉ achievingโฉ sustainability โฉalongโฉ Americaโsโฉ Energyโฉ Coast โฉare โฉinconsistentโฉ laws, โฉpolicies โฉandโฉ regulationsโฉ atโฉ allโฉ levels โฉofโฉ government.โฉโ
And why is the oil-backed group such a big fan of restoring wetlands and achieving โA New Sustainabilityโ? Could it possibly have anything to do with protecting oil rigs andย refineries?
โTheseโฉ coastalโฉ landscapesโฉ provideโฉ protection โฉto millionsโฉ ofโฉ peopleโฉ andโฉ hundredsโฉ ofโฉ billionsโฉ ofโฉ dollars worthโฉ ofโฉ propertyโฉ and โฉinfrastructure because โฉtheyโฉ serveโฉ as โฉbuffersโฉ against โฉhurricanesโฉ andโฉ storm โฉsurges.โ
The AWF paper even has the gall to blame global warming for threatening oil and gas infrastructure, oblivious to the irony of such anย argument:
โenergyโฉ productionโฉ andโฉ navigationโฉ activitiesโฉ are โฉessentialโฉ toโฉ Americaโsโฉ economicโฉ interests,โฉ butโฉ environmentalโฉ threats,โฉ suchโฉ as โฉincreasinglyโฉ intenseโฉ storms,โฉ risingโฉ seaโฉ levels,โฉ andโฉ ongoingโฉ coastalโฉ erosionโฉ andโฉ subsidenceโฉ poseโฉ a โฉsignificantโฉ risk โฉtoโฉ theโฉ physicalโฉ infrastructure thatโฉ supportsโฉ theseโฉ activities.โ
This week, AWF ran ads in several DC and Gulf Coast media outlets touting a letter the group sent to Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy. The top priority item requested in theย letter:
โAccelerate [Outer Continental Shelf drilling] revenue sharing to Gulf producing states for coastal restoration.โ
That would of course mean more risky offshore drilling, one of the primary threats to the Gulfโs health, as the BP disaster has made clear.
So next time you sign a petition ostensibly about โsavingโ the Gulf ecosystem, make sure you know who is behind it first. Americaโs Wetland Foundation seems more interested in saving face for the oil and gas industry and tapping taxpayer coffers to protect oil and gas infrastructure than truly protecting the Gulf Coast.
BP and the rest of the offshore drilling industry should โBe The Oneโ to clean up their mess, not the U.S. taxpayer.
Co-authored by Brendan DeMelle and Jerryย Cope.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts