Chart: The Deadliest Energy Sources in the World

picture-6706-1473698561.jpg
on

How deadly is your energy source? The very real and lethal effects of our global energy choices become clear in this interactive data visualization, showing the death rate, as measured by the number of deaths per terawatt hour (TWh), for each of the major global energy sources, e.g., coal, natural gas, oil, nuclear, hydro, peat, and biomass. Take a closer look at the chart here:

Chart of deaths per terawatt per energy source

Click on the image to view the fullย size.

The left column displays the percentage of world energy production for each energy source while on the right you can see the corresponding number of attributed deaths per terawattย hour.

To give some perspective to the value of a terawatt hour: โ€œAll wind turbines installed by the end of 2009 worldwide are generating 340 TWh per [year], equivalent to the total electricity demand of Italy, the seventh largest economy of the world, and equaling 2 percent of global electricity consumption,โ€ according to a report the World Wind Energy Association published last year (PDF). Meanwhile, wind energyโ€™s cumulative death rate is 0.01 deaths/TWh (.xls file), based on 44 deaths since 1975, which Paul Gipe, author of Wind Energy Comes of Age, calculated in 2010.

This data visualization comes via IBMโ€™s research site, Many Eyes, where you can click through to interact with the data. It doesnโ€™t show here the data for solar (rooftopโ€™sย 0.44 deaths/TWh) or wind, which the original source has claimed both have a higher number of deaths per TWh than nuclear (0.04 deaths/TWh). However, this doesnโ€™t take into account the most recent calculations for wind energy (0.01 deaths/TWh), making wind โ€“ and not nuclear โ€“ the least deadly energy source based on theseย metrics.

Coal, unsurprisingly, comes out the deadliest energy source, due to the clear health impacts of air particulate pollution. All the more reason theย Environmental Protection Agency should be strictly regulating coal powerโ€™s many hazardous air pollutants.

Nuclear energyโ€™s low death rate may seem somewhat surprising because of its pervasively toxic stigma (Homer Simpson working at a nuclear plant controls? โ€“ radiation! meltdown! Chernobyl!). However, the low rate here is likely due in part to the fact that nuclear supplies a larger chunk of energy worldwide in comparison to say, solar, and that deaths associated with nuclear energy are harder to link directly because the adverse and fatal effects can develop over a much longer period of time (e.g., cancer). Deaths from solar (rooftop, anyway) tend to be from falling accidents during installation and maintenance on roofs and shouldnโ€™t be dismissed in the push for clean energy because these deaths are easilyย preventable.

Hat tip to GOOD for highlighting the chart.

Image: Manyย Eyes

picture-6706-1473698561.jpg
Ashley Braun is Senior Editor of DeSmog and an award-winning science and environmental journalist. Her work has appeared in publications such as Smithsonian Magazine, The Atlantic, Scientific American, Discover, bioGraphic, Hakai Magazine, and Audubon.

Related Posts

on

Lawmakers warned that oil companies are using increasingly sophisticated messaging tactics to portray themselves as climate champions at the UK's first parliamentary debate on calls to ban adverti...
on

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.
on

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.
on

Green policy is under threat from corporate lobbying, right-wing parties and media and U.S. interference.

Green policy is under threat from corporate lobbying, right-wing parties and media and U.S. interference.