Republican Senator Scott Brown Suffering From "Subsidy Amnesia"

authordefault
on

With a straight face, Republican Senator Scott Brown told a crowd in Massachusetts this week that โ€œoil companies donโ€™t get subsidiesโ€ from the federal government. Brown tells us that, just like other companies, they are able to โ€œtake deductions,โ€ but nothing more.

The League of Conservation Voters (LCV) was quick to jump on the story, compiling an astounding array of information that proves that Scott Brown is either the most misinformed member of Congress when it comes to subsidies, or that heโ€™s a plain old liar. From an LCV press release:
 

Experts say oil company tax credits are essentially the same as direct spending subsidies. In a May 5, 2011 article, the Center for American Progress noted: โ€œ[T]he tax code is stuffed with a host of subsidies for oil and gas. These subsidies are delivered through the tax code but they are essentially no different from government spending programs that provide money directly.โ€ Additionally, citing nonpartisan organizations including the Tax Policy Center and Pew Charitable Trusts, Media Matters for America documented in an April 10 article that โ€œexperts say that [oil industry tax] incentives โ€“ legally categorized as tax expenditures โ€“ have effects similar to more direct cash transfers from the government.โ€ The Tax Policy Center stated that โ€œTax expenditures operate essentially like direct expenditures, even though they appear as tax breaks.โ€ Pewโ€™s SubsidyScope.org website stated: โ€œTax expenditures have a similar effect on the federal deficit as government spending. They can also have effects on recipients that are similar to grants or other types of subsidies.โ€ [Center for American Progress, 5/5/11; Media Matters for America, 4/10/12].

Prominent members of Scott Brownโ€™s own party recognize that tax expenditures are subsidies. In a March 28 article, Think Progress documented that โ€œNumerous Republican leaders have noted that a tax break is the same as a direct government [payment] or subsidy, in a different form. This includes President Ronald Reaganโ€™s chief economic advisor, Martin Feldstein, former Senate Budget Committee Chair Pete Domenici (R-NM), House Ways and Means Committee Chair Dave Camp (R-MI), and Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH).โ€ Think Progress included quotes for each of these Republicans in the article. [Think Progress, 3/28/12].
 

Not only does the oil industry receive subsidies from the federal government, but as the LCV points out, earlier this year, Scott Brown actually voted against repealing the subsidies for the oil industry, that are currently costing U.S. taxpayers as much as $7 billion a year.

Brown appears to be suffering from a disease weโ€™ll call โ€œsubsidy amnesia.โ€ He can claim that the subsidies donโ€™t exist all he wants, but the cold, hard truth is that heโ€™s voted for these very subsidies โ€œthat donโ€™t exist.โ€

Perhaps his amnesia is the result of the $227,000 that the oil and gas industries have put into his campaign, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

The truth is that everyone in the country that has been paying attention โ€“ from elected officials to average citizens โ€“ is well aware of the massive tax dollar giveaways that the oil industry receives every year. And every time the measure to repeal these subsidies comes up for a vote, Republicans vote it down. And for all of their complaining about โ€œwastefulโ€ government spending, they have no problem with calling these subsidies a โ€œdrop in the bucketโ€ because itโ€™s just a mere โ€œfew billionโ€ every year.

This subsidy amnesia is really no big shocker at all. After all, this is coming from the same Republican Senator who voted against allowing the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions, even after the U.S. Supreme Court told the agency that they were obligated to do so.

Brown is facing a fierce electoral battle this year against Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren, and a gaffe like this could do serious damage to a campaign when voters are already visibly angry about the subsidies that are flowing to the oil industry each year.

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.  Follow him on Twitter @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.
on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.
Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.