BC's Fracking Problem: Northern Gateway Not Only Concern for BC Residents

authordefault
on

The British Columbia government has plans to double or even triple the amount of natural gas produced in the province in order to meet growing international demand. Although the proposed Enbridgeย Northern Gateway pipeline is a key issue of concern to British Columbians,ย widespread fracking for unconventional gas presents another significant challenge that should be on the public’s radar, according to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).

As the CCPA reports, BC‘s gas production targets all but ensure the province will fail to meet its own 2007 emission reductions targets as laid out in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets Act. Exported gas from BC is expected to contribute the emissions equivalent of putting 24 million new cars on the road, and all for a 0.1 percent projected increase in provincialย jobs.

You can watch this animated video here for anย overview:

In a 2011 report the CCPA highlighted these outcomes of BC‘s frackingย ambitions:

– A potential doubling of industry greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, as fracking activities escalate. If BC is to meet its legislated targets for greenhouse gas reduction, every other sector of the provincial economy will have to cut their emissions inย half.

– The BC government giving shale gas companies access to public water supplies for 20 years, with little or no public consultation despite the massive amounts of water used (up to 600 Olympic swimming pools per gas wellย pad).

– Potential increases in shale gas piped to Alberta, where it already helps to fuel operations at the tarย sands.ย 

In response, CCPA advances theseย recommendations:

– A cap on annual shale gasย production.

– An end to all government subsidies of the natural gasย industry.

– A requirement that the province explain how BC will meet its legislatively mandated greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets while simultaneously supporting the shale gasย industry.

– Increased water prices for industry, to encourage innovation and conservation (currently companies pay nothing for the water they use, or nominal charges of just $2.75 for each Olympic swimming pool ofย water).

– A requirement that the industry pay full cost for the electricity itย uses.

Related Posts

on

The key facts about one of Nigel Farageโ€™s closest allies.

The key facts about one of Nigel Farageโ€™s closest allies.
Analysis
on

Itโ€™s a massive subsidy to Equinor, the Norwegian oil company behind the Bay du Nord offshore oil project.

Itโ€™s a massive subsidy to Equinor, the Norwegian oil company behind the Bay du Nord offshore oil project.
on

A new childrenโ€™s book by a Chevron-backed clean energy venture paints a sympathetic portrait of coal, oil, and gas.

A new childrenโ€™s book by a Chevron-backed clean energy venture paints a sympathetic portrait of coal, oil, and gas.
Analysis
on

Fossil fuel interests and climate science deniers have been leading the charge for more drilling.

Fossil fuel interests and climate science deniers have been leading the charge for more drilling.