As Their Oil Floods Arkansas Neighborhoods, Exxon Wins National Safety Award

authordefault
on

Isn’t this the definition ofย irony?ย The National Safety Council (NSC) honored Exxon Mobil with an award for โ€œcomprehensive commitment to safety excellenceโ€ at the same time that Exxon’s Pegasus pipeline spewed an estimated 84,000 gallons ofย tar sands crudeย through the yards of residents in Mayflower,ย Arkansas.ย 

From The Huffington Post:

โ€œIt is evident that ExxonMobil is committed to excellence in safety, security, health and environmental performance,โ€ said NSC president Janet Froetscher, who presented the award to ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson. โ€œThe Council is honored to recognize ExxonMobil with the Green Cross for Safety medal. This organization is a wonderful example of the role corporations can play in preventing injuries and savingย lives.โ€

Not only should the recent spill have caused the NSC to hesitate about giving the company an award for outstanding commitment to safety, but the companyโ€™s resolve to clean up their disaster has also been called intoย question.

DeSmogBlogโ€™s Carol Linnit pointed out last week that a tax loophole allowed Exxon to be exempt from paying into the national oil spill cleanup fund, meaning U.S. taxpayers could be on the hook for theย spill.

But current disasters aside, there is absolutely nothing in Exxonโ€™s corporate history that warrants any form of โ€œsafetyโ€ย award.

Excluding the Pegasus pipeline rupture, the company has experienced at least two significant oil disasters in the last five years, including contamination spills in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and Yellowstone.ย  The company has also been implicated in an oil spill that took place for several decades at a refinery operation in Brooklyn.ย  And of course, we canโ€™t forget the 11 million gallons of crude oil that the company spilled in Prince William Sound in 1989 with the Exxon Valdez spill.ย 

With this sordid history of calamity and complete disregard for safety, human lives, and the environment, how could the NSC possibly award the company for both their โ€œcommitment to safetyโ€ and โ€œenvironmentalย stewardship?โ€

While the NSC is legally listed as a non-profit, non-partisan organization, their internal makeup is a good indicator of the true nature of theย group.ย 

A quick examination of the National Safety Councilโ€™s board of directors shines some light on why they would honor a company with such an abysmal safety record.ย  Their board is stacked with current and former Exxon executives, current executives within the dirty energy industry, and plenty of representatives from the chemical sector, including some higher ups from Monsanto andย DuPont.

The NSC is just another industry-packed organization whose only purpose is to further the goals of their pals in industry.ย  The real problem is that the mainstream media has failed to connect the dots between Exxon and the National Safetyย Council.

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.