Since when is zoologist Matt Ridley an expert on climate changeย science?
Yes, I get it. The state of science versus opinion is at an all-time low in human history, with perhaps the Dark Ages the onlyย exception.
There is currently a โdebateโ being led by Matt Ridley (you can read all about Ridley’s complete lack of credentials in the field of climate science here) brewing in the right wing press about a possible โsubtle dropโ in the low end prediction of how fast global warming is occurring. Ridley’s quibbling comes, not coincidentally, less than two weeks before the release of the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a favorite whipping post of the climate denier echoย chamber.ย
Ridley and his pals at theย Global Warming Policy Foundationย have taken to the airwaves and the right-wing tabloids ahead of the official IPCC release date to try and pre-emptively discredit the IPCC‘s conclusions. It is a classic political move to get out first and fast before your opponents have a chance to tell their side of the story.
What they want to do (again) is create the appearance of controversy and debate to generate headlines and the perception that climate change science is not as solid as scientists say it is. Doubt is their product.
Hopefully the mainstream media will look pastย the thin veneer of credibility of Mattย Ridley and the Global Warming Policy Foundation, and instead speak to actual climate scientists instead of an expert on animals. The issue of climate change and the state of the science is too important to leave to rookies.ย ย ย
As for what is actually contained in the IPCC report, as one real live and trained climate scientist, Dr. Andrew Weaver, told the National Post:
โWhat weโve learned since 2007 is not a lot of new stuff. Itโs basically underscoring with greater certainty what weโve already said. To capture it in a sound bite, itโs essentially more of the same, with a little more certaintyโฆ. Scientists have done their job. Now itโs time for policymakers and politicians to do theirs if we as a society want to deal with this problem. Here we are, in 2013, with another massive report. Itโs just saying the sameย thing.โ
In other words, the news is just as bad as it was the last time the IPCC issued a report, no matter how many amateur experts want us to thinkย differently.ย
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts