DeSmog

Recent Federal Court Decision Could Muddy Waters for Keystone XL South, Flanagan South

picture-7018-1583982147.png
on

On June 6, theĀ U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed down a ruling that will serve as important precedent for the ongoing federal legal battles over the Keystone XL and Flanagan South tar sandsĀ pipelines.

In the Delaware Riverkeeper v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) case, judges ruled that a continuous pipeline project cannot be segmented into multiple parts to avoid a comprehensive National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review. This is whatĀ Kinder Morgan proposed and did for its Northeast Upgrade Project.

As reported on DeSmogBlog, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers did the same thing to streamline permitting for both the southern leg of TransCanada’s Keystone XL and Enbridge’s Flanagan South. Sierra Club and co-plaintiffs were denied injunctions for both pipelines in October and November 2013,Ā respectively.

Delaware Riverkeeper v. FERC dealt with breaking up a newĀ 40-mile long pipeline upgrade into four segments. For the other two cases, the Army Corps of Engineers shape-shifted the two projectsĀ ā€” both hundreds of miles long eachĀ ā€” into thousands of ā€œsingle and completeā€ projects for permittingĀ purposes.

On the day of theĀ Delaware Riverkeeper v. FERCĀ decision, Sierra Club attorney Doug Hayes submitted the case as supplemental authority for the ongoing Flanagan South case.

On May 5, Hayes also submitted paperwork to appeal the Keystone XL South decision in front of theĀ U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which was docketed by the clerk of Ccurt the next day.

Hayes told DeSmogBlogĀ his side will file an opening brief for the appeal on July 30. It seems likelyĀ Delaware Riverkeeper v. FERCĀ will be a key part of thatĀ appeal.

In a sign of the importance of the outcome for the oil and gas industry, the American Petroleum InstituteĀ (API)Ā entered the Sierra Club v. Army Corps of Engineers case on Keystone XL as an intervenorĀ on May 16, represented by corporate law firm Hunton & Williams.

At the federal level, Hunton & Williams lobbies on behalf of Koch Industries, a company with a major stake in tar sands leases and refining.

ā€œNo UncertainĀ Termsā€

Hayes told DeSmogBlog thatĀ Delaware Riverkeeper v. FERCĀ could prove a game-changer for the Keystone XL southern leg (now dubbed the Gulf Coast Pipeline Project) appeal, the Flanagan South decision and farĀ beyond.

ā€œDelaware Riverkeeper is important in many respects,ā€ Hayes said. ā€œIn general, the D.C. Circuit is considered the second most powerful court in the country and here it held, in no uncertain terms, that agencies must analyze all parts of these interrelated projects under NEPA to get the full picture of the environmentalĀ impacts.ā€

Photo Credit: C-SpanĀ Screenshot

The case depicts a collision between long-standing principles ofĀ environmental law and President Barack Obama’s March 2012 Executive Order expediting pipeline reviews ā€” an order issued six days after delivering a speech in front of the pipe segments that would two years later be pieced together as Keystone XL South, now open for business.

Executive OrderĀ 13604

Executive Order 13604, signed on March 28, 2012,Ā said ā€œagencies shallā€¦coordinate and expedite their reviewsā€¦as necessary to expedite decisions related to domestic pipeline infrastructure projects that would contribute to a more efficient domestic pipeline system for the transportation of crudeĀ oil.ā€Ā 

The Army Corps of Engineers’ deployment of Nationwide Permit 12 ā€” usually reserved for smaller infrastructure projectsĀ ā€”Ā served as the weapon of choice to ā€œcoordinate and expedite their reviewsā€ for TransCanada‘s Gulf Coast Pipeline Project and Enbridge‘s FlanaganĀ South.Ā 

In fulfilling the dictates of Executive Order 13604, both TransCanada and Enbridge have dodged doing a more robust NEPA analysis.Ā Ā 

ā€œThe oil industry has gone to great lengths to break projects into thousands of smaller pieces to avoid a true analysis of pipelines’ environmental impacts,ā€ HayesĀ said.

Doug Hayes; Photo Credit: Sierra Club Environmental LawĀ Program

ā€œThis has been especially true of the Enbridge system, and of pipelines that are approved by the Corps using Nationwide Permit 12. In Flanagan South, NEPA was unquestionably triggered because the agencies prepared three separate EAs for different parts of theĀ pipeline.ā€Ā 

In other words, the approach called for byĀ Executive Order 13604 may no longer hold legalĀ water.Ā 

ā€œThe issue is whether agencies can segment a project into smaller pieces, and prepare a narrow analysis for each part, without looking at an entire project in a single NEPA analysis,ā€ saidĀ Hayes.

ā€œThe Delaware Riverkeeper v. FERC decision was a resounding ‘no.’ It held that a linear pipeline can only be ‘segmented’ into smaller components if the individual parts would have independentĀ utility.ā€

Pipeline companies put ā€œonĀ noticeā€

Aaron Stemplewicz, Delaware Riverkeeper’s attorney for the case, said the court’s precedent-setting decision should put all pipeline companies ā€œonĀ notice.ā€

ā€œThe D.C. Circuitā€™s decision today should put other pipeline companies on notice that the practice of segmenting pipeline projects before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will no longer be tolerated,ā€ he told New Jersey’s Star-Ledger.

As evidenced by the May 16 API intervention in the Sierra Club v. Army Corps of Engineers case, the oil industry has taken notice. So too has corporate law firm giant K&L Gates, issuing a memo on the Delaware Riverkeeper v. FERC ruling published June 20, just two weeks after the decision was handedĀ down.

ā€œSome may say, so what?,ā€ wrote K&L Gates.Ā ā€œThe projects are already built, so if the agency has to go through an academic and theoretical exercise, it has no real world implications. Those who think this do so at their ownĀ peril.ā€Ā 

ā€œFuture investors and developers should be concernedā€¦[that] these decisions may well impact how FERC, and other agencies, consider future ‘related’Ā projects.ā€

Hunton & Williams, API‘s counsel forĀ Sierra Club v. Army Corps of Engineers,Ā also issued its own client alert onĀ Delaware Riverkeeper v. FERC, serving as a prelude to what will be its ongoing involvement in chipping away at theĀ ruling.

Clearly, both sides have taken notice. With both billions of dollars of industry profits and a sustainable planet at stake, to the victors go theĀ spoils.Ā 

Photo Credit: schankzĀ | Shutterstock

picture-7018-1583982147.png
Steve Horn is the owner of the consultancy Horn Communications & Research Services, which provides public relations, content writing, and investigative research work products to a wide range of nonprofit and for-profit clients across the world. He is an investigative reporter on the climate beat for over a decade and former Research Fellow for DeSmog.

Related Posts

on

Sadiq Khan faces calls to ban fossil fuel industry messaging from tube stations and buses.

Sadiq Khan faces calls to ban fossil fuel industry messaging from tube stations and buses.
Opinion
on

To deal with the challenges of the new normal, the next UK government must transform education now.

To deal with the challenges of the new normal, the next UK government must transform education now.
on

The party has pumped out hundreds of adverts falsely stating that Labour would introduce a ā€œnational ULEZā€, and pay per mile charges.

The party has pumped out hundreds of adverts falsely stating that Labour would introduce a ā€œnational ULEZā€, and pay per mile charges.
on

The company has removed dozens of documents referencing the technology from its website following passage of a new anti-greenwashing law.

The company has removed dozens of documents referencing the technology from its website following passage of a new anti-greenwashing law.