Oil-by-Rail Fuels Record U.S. Imports of Canadian Oil

mikulka color
on

In September, many of the major railroad stocks hit new all-timeย highs.

Investors Business Daily attributed much of the increase to the business of movingย oil-by-rail.

While the majority of the oil moving by rail has been fracked light sweet crudes from places like the Bakken and Eagle Ford shale basins, the railroads are telling investors that to keep increasing profits they are looking to expand the business of tar sands byย rail.

This past week, the Wall Street Journal reported Canadian Pacificโ€™s chief operating officer Keith Creelโ€™s optimistic position about the growth prospects of moving tar sands byย rail.

โ€œThe growth is shifting from the light sweet Bakken crude which is the more volatile and sensitive, to the heavy crude in northern Alberta,โ€ Creel said. โ€œItโ€™s safer, less volatile and more profitable to move and weโ€™re uniquely positioned to connect to the West Coast as well as the Eastย Coast.โ€

It’s new for rail companies to admit that moving tar sands by rail is more profitable than moving Bakkenย oil.

Oil Shipments Via Canadian Pacific Rail Set toย Double

In 2013, Canadian Pacific moved 90,000 carloads of crude oil. In 2015, the company is predicting it will move more than twice that much and it expects โ€œheavy crude oil from Albertaโ€ to soon account for 60 per cent of its oil revenues. Currently Bakken crude accounts for the majority of the companyโ€™s oilย business.

Canadian Pacificโ€™s CEO Hunter Harrison also told the Wall Street Journal that the company is investing heavily, including upgrading four oil-by-rail terminals in Western Canada, upgrading tracks to allow for โ€œlonger, heavier trains and the doubling of speed along some of its trackโ€ all as part of plans to โ€œship Alberta oilย east.โ€

Canadian Pacific is not alone in this approach. Plattโ€™s reported that Canadian National is also planning a big increase in its movement of Western Canadian crude. In 2013, Canadian National shipped 73,000 cars of crude by rail and the companyโ€™s projection is to more than double that by 2015 to a total of 150,000ย carloads.

Platts also reported that there has been significant investment in new tank cars to move all of this oil, indicating that the โ€œorder books of tank car manufacturers are bulging with 40,000 additional cars due to be delivered by late 2015 to carry more crude from Westernย Canada.โ€

Canadian Oil Exports Hit All-Timeย High

All of this contributed to Canadian oil exports to the U.S. hitting another all-time high for the first week of October at more than three million barrels a day. The Financial Post reported that oil market analyst Mike Tran of CIBC World Markets credited the increase to railย transport.

โ€œAs weโ€™ve pointed out over recent weeks, the new high-water mark is indicative of a sizable pick-up in rail activity given that pipeline takeaway capacity has notย increased.โ€

These developments along with other efforts previously reported by DeSmogBlog to move tar sands by rail to the East Coast for export indicate the growing use of rail to move Western Canadian tar sands oil. However, one of the areas benefiting most from this development are the West coast refineries that prefer heavyย crudes.

โ€œRefinery configuration in California is oriented toward heavy or medium sour crude, and the Canadian barrels, which are heavy and somewhat sour, are a better fit than the light Bakken barrels,โ€ David Hackett of energy consultant Stillwater Associates told Bloomberg earlier thisย year.

California Imports of Canadian Oilย Skyrocket

The increase in bringing Canadian crude to California is a recent development. In 2012, the highest monthly total for Canadian crude imported to California by rail was 63,163 barrels. In 2013, the highest monthly total was 11 times that much at 709,014 barrels. So far in 2014, 372,277 is the highest monthly total, but data is only available throughย July.

With the new USD Group facility coming online in the second half of 2014, as well as the Canexus tar sands rail loading facility being reactivated in late September, the second half numbers of 2014 will be interesting toย monitor.

California refineries received 3.64 million barrels of crude-by-rail in the first six months of 2014. According to the Governorโ€™s proposed budget summary, in 2016 California could be receiving as many as 150 million barrels of crude-by-railย annually.

While the recent drop in oil prices has producers in both the Bakken and the Western Canadian tar sands worried, both the oil and rail industries have been putting the pieces in place to significantly increase the movement of tar sands byย rail.

The oil industry and the rail car industry have histories of betting wrong on the tail end of a boom in their business โ€” only time will tell if this current bet paysย off.

mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.