"Frack Pack" Bills Introduced, Aim to Rein in Environmental Damage From Fracking Industry

1-DSC09675
on

On Thursday, Congressional Democrats introduced a set of four bills aimed at countering the environmental harms from hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and the continuing shale gasย rush.

Four Representatives โ€” Reps. Diana DeGette and Jared Polis of Colorado, Matt Cartwright of Pennsylvania, and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois โ€” and one Senator, Pennsylvania’s Bob Casey, together announced the proposed legislation, dubbing the bills the โ€œFrack Packโ€ and saying they were designed to roll-back loopholes in existing federalย laws.

โ€œLoopholes and exceptions written into the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Clean Air Act have kept landmark environmental laws from protecting the health and safety of individuals and families living in communities affected by fracking,โ€ the members of Congress said in a joint statement. โ€œBy closing loopholes, the โ€˜Frack Packโ€™ bills would hold the energy industry to the same standards that apply toย everyone.โ€

The first bill, titled Bringing Reductions to Energy’s Airborne Toxic Health Effects or BREATHE, aims to address toxic air pollution from drilling and fracking by revoking a Clean Air Act exemption that has allowed drillers to dodge rules that apply to otherย industries.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Polis and Rep. Cartwright, would allow EPA to consider the cumulative pollution from an entire well site or gas field, rather than considering the emissions from each piece of equipment separately, when it decides whether a given site must follow the stricter air emission rules for largerย polluters.

โ€œOne or two fracking pads might not make much of a difference. But you suddenly put thousands of them in a limited area, it has an enormous impact on air quality which is currently exempt from the Clean Air Act,โ€ Rep. Polis told CBSย News.

The next bill in the collection, the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act (or FRAC Act), was first introduced in the House by Rep. DeGette and in the Senate by Sen. Casey in 2009, and was re-submitted by both this year. It aims to close the so-called โ€œHalliburton loophole,โ€ which was added to the Safe Drinking Water Act in 2005 under the George W. Bush administration, and would also require drillers to disclose chemicals used during fracking.

โ€œThis information will then be made public on a website,โ€ Senator Caseyโ€™s office said in a statement. โ€œDisclosure will ensure that if drinking water supplies, surface waters, or human health are compromised, the public and first responders will be properlyย informed.โ€

A third bill, dubbed the FRESHER Act (Focused Reduction of Effluence and Stormwater runoff through Hydrofracking Environmental Regulation Act) would address run-off from well pads and other oil and gas industry sites, which currently falls into a loophole in the Clean Water Act. Pennsylvania’s Rep. Cartwright also earlier sponsored a different bill that takes aim at the exemptions for the oil and gas industry in hazardous waste handlingย laws.ย 

โ€œUnder current federal law, oil and gas companies do not even have to test their waste to see if it is toxic, leaving us with no way of knowing what is being disposed of and how it is being treated,โ€ Cartwright said in 2013 about that proposal. โ€œIt is time oil and gas companies comply with existing minimum standards andย oversight.โ€

And finally, the SHARED Act (Safe Hydration is an American Right in Energy Development Act) was introduced by Rep. Schakowsky, and would require drillers to test water sources near fracked wells before, during and after fracking, and to publicly disclose the results of thoseย tests.

โ€œHydraulic fracturing operators and the oil and gas industries insist that fracking is safe, and does not cause water contamination,โ€ Rep. Schakowsky said in a statement. โ€œThe SHARED Act says ‘proveย it.’โ€

Environmental groups, including Earthjustice, Earthworks, Clean Water Action, the League of Conservation Voters, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and WildEarth Guardians, launched letters to other members of Congress, urging them to support the Frackย Pack.

โ€œScientific studies have shown that oil and gas development, including drilling, fracking, processing, and ongoing production is linked to hazardous air pollution, contaminated drinking water supplies, and toxic waste,โ€ the groups wrote. โ€œIn spite of these risks, the oil and gas industry has been given unprecedented exemptions from our nationโ€™s bedrock environmentalย laws.โ€

Oil and gas industry representatives pushed back, arguing that the exemptions for the industry in federal environmental laws should not be consideredย โ€œloopholes.โ€

โ€œAll of these bills are based on false information about supposed gaps in state and federal regulations that are actually talking points from the environmental lobby, and not based on reality,โ€ Kathleen Sgamma, vice-president of the Western Energy Alliance said in a statement, according to CBSย News.

But others said that even federal regulation would not go far enough to protect against the harms caused byย fracking.ย 

โ€œThe Frack Pack is an important first step toward stopping the oil and gas industry from profiting from the destruction of local communities and the pollution of our air and water. Oil and gas companies must be held to the same standards as other industries when it comes to protecting public health and the environment,โ€ said Friends of the Earthโ€™s Climate and Energy campaigner Kateย DeAngelis.

โ€œFriends of the Earth strongly supports this bill, but recognizes that no protections can make fracking safe, and the only real solution is a ban on this destructive practice.โ€
ย 

Photo Credit: Judges wooden gavel and law books on white background, viaย Shutterstock

1-DSC09675
Sharon Kelly is an attorney and investigative reporter based in Pennsylvania. She was previously a senior correspondent at The Capitol Forum and, prior to that, she reported for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Nation, Earth Island Journal, and a variety of other print and online publications.

Related Posts

on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.