A Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) employee who worked as a locomotive engineer on the company’sย oil-by-rail train that exploded in rural Casselton, North Dakota in December 2013 has sued his former employer.ย
Filed in Cass County, the plaintiff Bryan Thompson alleges he โwas caused to suffer and continues to suffer severe and permanent injuries and damages,โ including but not limited to ongoing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)ย issues.
Thompson’s attorney,ย Thomas Flaskamp, told DeSmogBlog he โdelayed filing [the lawsuit until now] primarily to get an indication as to the direction of where Mr. Thompson’s care and treatment for his PTSD arising out of the incident was heading,โ which he says is still being treated by aย psychiatrist.
The lawsuit is the first of its kind in the oil-by-rail world, the only time to date that someone working on an exploding oil train has taken legal action against his employer using theย Federal Employers’ Liability Act.
Image Credit: State of North Dakota District Court; East Central Judicialย District
โRun for Hisย Lifeโ
In the aftermath of the Casseltonย explosion, rail industry consultant Sheldon Lustig told the Associated Press that freight trains carrying oil obtained viaย hydraulic fracturing (โfrackingโ)ย in North Dakota’sย Bakken Shaleย basin are akin to โbomb trains,โ putting the now oft-used term on the map for the firstย time.ย
Since Casselton, several other oil-by-rail explosions and disasters have ensued in the U.S.ย
Thompson experienced the wrath of an exploding โbomb trainโ up close andย personal.ย
Flaskamp toldย The Forum newspaper in Fargo, North Dakota that Thompson had to โrun for his lifeโ to escape the train he was manning once it derailed after colliding with an oncoming grainย train.
โBehind him, tank cars were starting to derail, catch fire and explode,โ Flaskamp told The Forum of Thompson, who is in his 30s and is currently in school to obtain a teachingย degree.
The plaintiffs allege BNSF, owned by multi-billionaire Warren Buffett, violated the Federal Employers’ Liability Act in multipleย ways.
They include โfailing and neglecting to provide [Thompson] with a reasonably safe place to workโ and โfailing to warn [him] of the dangers of hauling explosive oil tank railcars and the tendencies of these railcars to rupture and explode upon sufferingย damage.โ
Image Credit: State of North Dakota District Court; East Central Judicialย District
BNSF‘sย Knowledge
In the aftermath of the Casselton explosion, DeSmogBlog reported that the company that owned the terminal intended to receive that oilย โ which owns a facility in Missouri that off-loads the oil into barges in the Mississippi River โ notified the Missouriย government on its permit application that the oil it planned to handle has high levels of volatileย chemicals.ย
Put another way, BNSF may have known quite a bit more about the danger of carrying Bakken fracked oil than it ever told Thompson. And that will likely serve as a contentious point in the case as it snakes its way forward in Cass Countyย court.ย
โBNSF knew or should have known of the dangerous nature of the cargo it required its crews to transport and should have exercised great care in its transport,โ Flaskamp told DeSmogBlog. โThe Answer to the complaint which will be filed by the BNSF will be telling as to their theories ofย defense.โ
Photo Credit:ย Shawnย Rode
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts