North Carolina Settles With Duke Energy Over Coal Ash Groundwater Contamination, Ratepayers May Shoulder Costs

authordefault
on

This is a guest post by Rhiannon Fionn, anย independent investigative journalist and filmmaker in post-production on the documentary film โ€œCoal Ash Chronicles.โ€ย 

North Carolinaโ€™s Department of Environmental Quality today announced a settlement agreement with Duke Energy, ending a lawsuit over the departmentโ€™s $25.1 million fine for groundwater contamination resulting from coal ash stored at the companyโ€™s Sutton plant near Wilmington, N.C. Although the settlement covers groundwater contamination at 14 of Dukeโ€™s coal ash facilities and requires accelerated cleanup of groundwater contamination at four sites, activists and residents I spoke with today were not impressed by theย announcement.

Since a judge approved the settlement, there will be no opportunity for publicย comment.

โ€œI am again disappointed with the department, but not terribly surprised,โ€ said Catawba Riverkeeper Sam Perkins. โ€œThis is an impressive new low,โ€ he added. โ€œThey put a proposed fine out there, but theyโ€™ve not only reduced it, they diluted it to 14ย sites.โ€

The state reports the settlement is for an estimated $20 million, though the company doesnโ€™t agree. Paige Sheehan, a Duke representative, estimates the cost to remediate groundwater at its Sutton plant alone will run $3-$5 million, and less at smaller coal ashย sites.

According to Sheehan, $7 million of the settlement http://www.duke-energy.com/news/releases/2015092901.asp will be paid by shareholders, but she left open the possibility that the company will seek a rate increase from the N.C. Utilities Commission to cover groundwater remediationย costs.

In Nov. 2014, WRAL.com reported that Duke set aside $3.4 billion for coal ash cleanups in N.C., which includes the removal of much of the waste to lined landfills in multipleย states.

Crystal Feldman, director of communications for DEQ, told me settlement negotiations began in March after Duke Energy sued the agency for levying the state-record $25 million fine against the company. Duke called the fine โ€œunprecedentedโ€ and balked at the requirement to run municipal water lines when it was already doingย so.

Dukeโ€™s Sheehan said the negotiations continued through last night and that an agreement was made just before the parties were to appear in courtย today.

North Carolina on theย Defensive

When asked how the public benefits from the settlement and what โ€œacceleratedโ€ remediation means, Feldman insisted that most of her comments be off-the-record. This is the only statement she wanted on theย record:

โ€œThis is the single largest fine ever issued in North Carolina for environmental damages. We are the first administration against Duke Energy on coal ash. And this settlement allows us to hold Duke Energy accountable and to focus all of our efforts on the cleanup and closureย process.โ€

But the stateโ€™s first coal ash regulations became law under a previous administration, and Feldman seemed unaware that Duke Energyโ€™s groundwater assessment reports were conducted by third-party engineering firms. She was testy when asked why certain plants were left out of the settlement โ€” including the site of the companyโ€™s Dan River coal ash spill in Feb. 2014, the third largest in U.S.ย history.

Feldman said the DEQ has received, but not reviewed, assessments for its Dan River and Riverbend sites. Riverbend is on the banks of the city of Charlotteโ€™s main drinking water reservoir. Charlotte is the largest city in the state and the home of the companyโ€™s corporateย headquarters.

The assessments submitted to DEQ are available on the stateโ€™s website, and executive summaries appear on the companyโ€™s website. Sheehan stated that each assessment can run 1,000 pages orย more.

The North Carolina General Assembly has given the company until 2019 to clean up much of its coal ash across the state, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyโ€™s coal ash regulations take effect nextย month.

Clean Water for theย People

When Duke Energyโ€™s Sheehan was asked how this settlement benefits the public, sheย stated:

โ€œWe want to move forward. We want to move ash basins in ways that are smart, that protect people and the environment. It helps us clear away a legal distraction and focus on the important workโ€ of aย cleanup.

Hundreds of residents in North Carolina near multiple coal ash sites have been warned by the state not to use or drink their well water. Besides the Sutton plant, there are no disclosed plans to run municipal water to residents with contaminated well water. Sheehan says Duke Energy has begun construction on water lines in the Wilmingtonย area.

At a press conference held by activists in the stateโ€™s capitol last week, Larry Mathis of Belmont, N.C. had this toย say:

โ€œOur water had been tested by [DEQ], and was found to have 38 times the state standard for Vanadium. It has 28.6 times the standard for hexavalent chromium. The more Iโ€™ve learned, the more concerns I have about health and safety. Our property values have suffered as well. Who wants to live in a place with contaminated water, contaminated land and dirtyย air?โ€

Mathis also stated that the bottled water provided by Duke Energy would only be supplied to residents for two moreย months.

At that same press conference, the Raging Grannies, a non-violent activist group united with other activist groups on the coal-ash issue in N.C. sang a song for Duke Energy. Watchย it:

Rhiannon Fionn is an independent investigative journalist and filmmaker in post-production on the documentary film โ€œCoal Ash Chronicles.โ€

Image credit: Rhiannon Fionn via Flickr

authordefault

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.