Rudd's Renewable Cuts Send 'Perverse Signal' Ahead of Paris Climate Conference Says UN Scientist

R2uAVsWy_400x400
onOct 21, 2015 @ 04:02 PDT

Top UN environment scientist Jacqueline McGlade has criticised cuts in support for renewable energy pushed by Energy and Climate Secretary Amber Rudd and her department as sending a โ€œperverse signalโ€ ahead of the Paris climate change conference inย December.

McGlade, a former head of the European Environment Agency, is the most prominent international expert to join the mounting criticism of the UKโ€™s solar and wind subsidyย cuts.

Speaking to Roger Harrabin of the BBC this week ahead of the preparatory climate meeting currently taking place in Bonn, McGlade said: โ€œWhat Iโ€™m seeing worldwide is a move very much towards investment in renewable energy. To counterbalance that, you see the withdrawal of subsidies and tax breaks for fossilย fuels.โ€

She continued: โ€œWhatโ€™s disappointing is when we see countries such as the United Kingdom that have really been in the lead in terms of getting their renewable energy up and going โ€“ we see subsidies being withdrawn and the fossil fuel industry beingย enhanced.โ€

Cuts in renewable subsidies, coupled with tax breaks for oil and gas, sends the wrong message in the lead up to the Paris climate conference, McGlade said; just as the world is rushing towards clean energy the UK appears to be runningย away.

โ€œItโ€™s a very serious signal,โ€ she said, โ€œa very perverse signal that we do not want toย create.โ€

You can read the full interviewย here.

Photo: International Council for Science viaย Flickr

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

onDec 4, 2025 @ 11:48 PST

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.
Analysis
onDec 2, 2025 @ 07:48 PST

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.
onNov 28, 2025 @ 03:02 PST

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.
Opinion
onNov 27, 2025 @ 06:38 PST

Blunt communication is our firewall.

Blunt communication is our firewall.