Arch Coal Nearly Doubled Its CEO Pay As It Lurched To Bankruptcy, Drawing SEC Attention

authordefault
on

This is a guest post by Joe Smyth from Greenpeace, originally published at Medium.

Arch Coal, the second largest coal mining company in the US, filed for bankruptcy on Monday, raising questions about the companyโ€™s reclamation obligations for its massive strip mines, its plans to export coal from the Powder River Basin to Asia, the future of its existing and pending federal coal leases, and more. While Arch Coal sold mines, cut wages, and stopped paying dividends as its fortunes fell, one area it didnโ€™t skimp was executiveย compensation.

In fact, while Arch Coal shareholders (or at least those who failed to divest from the company) have lost out, Arch CEO John Eaves somehow got a big raise as his company was failingโ€Šโ€”โ€Šwhich seems to have earned the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

When Arch Coal reported how much its CEO made in 2014, the SEC responded with something like the official version of a raised eyebrow. In a March 31, 2015 letter to Arch Coal, the SEC wrote: โ€œWe also note the significant increase in your CEOโ€™s total compensation. In future filings, please revise your CD&A to separately discuss in greater detail your CEOโ€™sย compensation.โ€

Of course, obscene CEO pay is nothing new, but in this case it does seem particularly brazen. Arch Coalโ€™s CEO made $7.3 million in 2014, a full $3 million more than he made in 2013โ€Šโ€”โ€Šyet during that same time, the value of his coal company dropped precipitously. What possible explanation could there be for such a dramatic pay raise for the CEO of a company doing soย poorly?

Arch Coal responded to the SEC, but without an explanation: โ€œWe acknowledge the Staffโ€™s comment. In future filings we will provide a more detailed discussion of our CEOโ€™sย compensation.โ€

That wasnโ€™t quite good enough for the SEC, which wrote back a week later: โ€œWe note your response to comment 4. Please show us how you propose to revise the discussion of your CEOโ€™s compensation.โ€ Arch Coal responded with more details, trying to show how โ€œwe attempt to align the long-term interests of our executives with those of ourย stockholders.โ€

So how exactly are the interests of Arch Coalโ€™s CEO aligned with those of the companyโ€™s shareholders? After John Eaves became CEO in 2012, Arch Coal increased his pay from $3.9 million to $4.3 million 2013, and then gave a major increase to $7.3 million in 2014. That included a $3.1 million bonus, and according to the Institute for Policy Studies report Executive Excess 2015: Money to Burn, the company covered his country club dues, โ€œand $14,700 for his personal financial planning servicesโ€โ€Šโ€”โ€Šclearly, planning how to use all that money is notย cheap.

That means that over just the three years of 2012, 2013, and 2014, Arch Coal CEO John Eavesโ€™ compensation was over $15 millionโ€Šโ€”โ€Šnot counting whatever he received in 2015, which has not yet beenย reported.

How could Arch Coal explain this big boost in CEO compensation as it lurched towardย bankruptcy?

Arch Coalโ€™s explanation for its executivesโ€™ compensation appears to rely heavily on the bizarre notion that CEOs should be paid more because their companies are failingโ€Šโ€”โ€Šso executives donโ€™t ditch the company. Or as Archโ€™s SEC filing puts it, โ€œeven though the coal industry is currently in a depressed market, it is important to offer competitive base salaries in order to attract and retain talent.โ€ (Arch appears to unironically consider its CEOโ€™s performanceย โ€œtalent.โ€)

Thatโ€™s the same justification that another failing coal mining company, Alpha Natural Resources, used to explain the $2 million โ€œretention bonusesโ€ it offered to its CEO and Presidentโ€Šโ€”โ€Šbecause of the โ€œparticularly difficult market and regulatory conditions which could affect the company and the coal industry generally in the coming years.โ€ It didnโ€™t workโ€Šโ€”โ€ŠAlphaโ€™s President left anyway, and the company filed for bankruptcy soon after. After filing for bankruptcy, Alpha sought โ€œpermission to pay senior executives bonuses of up to $14.8 million,โ€ the Casper Star Tribune reported, even as the company moves to cut retiree health benefits that would save $3 million aย year.

Given Eavesโ€™ history, thereโ€™s little doubt that heโ€™ll continue to pay himself handsomely to oversee the company he helped drive to bankruptcy.
ย 

Image credit:ย Arch Coalโ€™s Black Thunder coal strip mine in the Powder River Basin, by Tim Aubry forย Greenpeace.

authordefault

Related Posts

on

But experts say these โ€œabusiveโ€ lawsuits, which are designed to demoralize and drain resources from activists, should be fought, not feared.

But experts say these โ€œabusiveโ€ lawsuits, which are designed to demoralize and drain resources from activists, should be fought, not feared.
Analysis
on

Former PM Stephen Harper is now in charge of AIMCo. Even the free-market Fraser Institute is against it.

Former PM Stephen Harper is now in charge of AIMCo. Even the free-market Fraser Institute is against it.
on

The projectโ€™s oil and gas backers say the project is a win for all Indigenous peoples. But neighboring First Nations disagree.

The projectโ€™s oil and gas backers say the project is a win for all Indigenous peoples. But neighboring First Nations disagree.
on

A dark money trail linked to pipeline company Energy Transfer could be behind a mysterious mailer targeting North Dakota residents in the lead-up to its trial with Greenpeace.

A dark money trail linked to pipeline company Energy Transfer could be behind a mysterious mailer targeting North Dakota residents in the lead-up to its trial with Greenpeace.