Environmental Groups United To Fight Donald Trump

authordefault
on

Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has never been shy about making statements that push the boundaries of what is acceptable in a civilized society, but his constant attacks on climate science have become yet another liability for the Republicanย candidate.

The Hill is reporting that environmental groups,ย including the NRDC and the Sierra Club,ย are hoping to rally voters concerned about the environment to vote for Hillary Clinton over Trump in the 2016 election to help protect theย environment.

From The Hill:

To the groups backing Clinton, the choice in the 2016 election is clear: someone who would continue and expand President Obamaโ€™s aggressive environmental agenda, or Republican Donald Trump, who says he would undo every piece of it that he could, including the Clean Power Plan and the Paris climateย agreement.

The growing concerns are Trumpโ€™s constant claims that global warming is a โ€œhoaxโ€ and that environmental regulations are impeding the growth and profitability of businesses, a standard Republican talking point that has been thoroughlyย debunked.

During his speech on energy policy in late May, Trump indicated that he would rely heavily on fossil fuels for American energy if elected president, and went as far as to promise the dying coal industry that he could somehow revive it. He blamed the decline in coal reliance on bad policy, rather than a lack of demand from both domestic and overseas markets.

Trump has also promised to repeal many of President Obamaโ€™s carbon reduction rules and heโ€™s set on either renegotiating the historic Paris climate accords or pulling the United States out of the agreementย completely.

He has also said that heโ€™s open to simply doing away with the Environmental Protection Agency (ignoring the fact that the agency was actually created by Republican President Richard Nixon during a time when environmental protection was not considered a partisanย issue.)

Naturally, Trumpโ€™s insistence that climate change is not happening and his desire to repeal the few environmental achievements that have occurred in the last few years would leave environmental groups clamoring for someone to champion their cause, but it wasnโ€™t as simple as youโ€™d assume. Again, from The Hill:

Daniel J. Weiss, a principal at Waxman Strategies and a veteran of numerous environmental and progressive groups, said that while itโ€™s little surprise that green advocates would line up behind the Democrat, they have been more strategic with their endorsements thisย year.

The reluctance to endorse Hillary Clinton early on in the campaign was due to the threat that Senator Bernie Sanders posed to the Clinton campaign and his outspoken criticism of climate change deniers and the need to address the issueย head-on.

In the very first Democratic debate, Bernie Sanders was the only candidate on the stage who said that climate change was the greatest threat to American citizens while all of the other candidates, Hillary Clinton included, said that terrorism was the greatest threat. Sanders also held Q&A sessions with the media where the sole focus was on climate and environmentalย issues.

Aside from Sanders more outspoken views on the environment, there could have also been reservations about Clintonโ€™s perceived flip-flopping on environmental issues. While she initially proposed a $30 billion plan to switch the country off of coal, she later told coal workers that their industry would play a vital role in Americaโ€™s energy future. She has also referred to natural gas as a โ€œbridge fuelโ€ that will help America transition to clean energy โ€” without acknowledging the dangers ofย fracking.

Oddly enough, Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein was left out of the endorsements, even though her Partyโ€™s platform is one whose primary focus is on protecting the environment and tackling climateย change.

But in the end, Hillary Clinton won key green endorsements over Trump because the groups decided that some progress was better than turningย backwards, and thatโ€™s exactly what could happen if Donald Trump gets the keys to the White House.
ย 

Image: YouTubeย screenshot

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.
on

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.