How IOGCC Spawned the Lawsuit That Just Overturned BLM Fracking Regulations on Public Lands

picture-7018-1583982147.png
on

In a ruling on the Obama Administration’s proposed regulations ofย hydraulic fracturing (โ€œfrackingโ€) on U.S. public lands, U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming Judge Scott Skavdahl โ€” a President Obama appointeeย โ€” struck down the rules as an illegal violation of the Energy Policy Act ofย 2005.ย 

Filed in March 2015ย by first the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) andย Western Energy Alliance and then the State of Wyoming (soon joined by North Dakota, Utah and Colorado), the industry and state lawsuits would soon thereafter merge into a single lawsuit. The merger symbolizes the origins of the lawsuit โ€”ย the 2014 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) annual meeting in Columbus,ย Ohio.

IOGCC, a collective of state-level oil and gas industry regulators or other official state representatives appointed by governors (sometimes lobbyists or industry executives), merges together industry interests and regulators by bringing them to the table at biannual meetings and providingย a network through which to maintain year-round communications andย coordination.

The majority of IOGCC‘s at-large members work for the oil and gas industry as lobbyists and executives. And like the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), IOGCC members propose and pass modelย resolutions.

At the 2014ย Columbus meeting attended by DeSmog, IOGCC‘s resolutions committee convened to discuss what to do aboutย the then-proposed U.S. Department of Interior regulationย of fracking on public lands. Although a resolution did not pass out of the committee โ€”ย one was deliberated upon but ultimately tabled until the May 2015 IOGCC business meeting held in Salt Lake City, Utah โ€”ย an action plan didย arise.

That plan called for resolutions committee member Lynn Helms, North Dakota’s official state representative to IOGCC and the head of its Industrial Commission (and former long-time employee of Hess Corporation), to contact U.S. Sen. John Hoeven’s (R-ND) legal counsel and chief-of-staff โ€”ย Ryan Bernsteinย โ€” and formulate a plan to stall or block the proposed rules. Emails obtained under North Dakota’sย Open Records Statute show that indeed, Helms contacted Bernstein to get the ball rolling ย to do justย that.

IOGCC Fracking Public Lands

Image Credit: North Dakota Industrialย Commission

Months later, IOGCC‘s deputy director Gerry Baker emailedย public lands committee members on March 24, 2015 to check in on the status of congressional activity on the proposed resolutions. Helms responded to the email, saying he had emailed Bernstein on March 3 and that he is โ€œtrying to get an answer to me by end of theย month.โ€

On the same day IPAA filed its lawsuit on March 20, 2015, Hoeven’s office issued a press release denouncing the BLM‘s finalย rule.ย 

โ€œWe have long supported a states-first approach to hydraulic fracturing, recognizing that states have a successful record of effectively regulating hydraulic fracturing with good environmental stewardship. Now, however, the Interior Department is imposing a federal regulation that duplicates what the states have been doing successfully for decades,โ€ stated Hoeven. โ€œWe encourage the BLM to work with states and defer to the regulatory programs they have put in place with a long and successful trackย record.โ€

Bernstein did get an answer on April 10, 2015ย in the form of a memorandumย addressed to Hoeven (formerly chairman for IOGCC when he served as North Dakota Governor) and Bernstein from the Congressional Research Service (CRS) obtained under Utah’s Government Records Access and Management Act. That memo concluded that states, according to the research conducted by CRS legislative attorney Alexandra Wyatt, doย notย possess legal authority to have regulatory duties transferred to them as it pertains to fracking on U.S. publicย lands.ย 

Image Credit: Congressional Research Serviceย 

IOGCC Tells DeSmog โ€œWe Will Write theย Billโ€

A month later, Utah Governor Gary Herbertย โ€” then IOGCC‘s chairmanย โ€” announced at the IOGCC‘s business meeting in Salt Lake City on May 18, 2015 that his state would enter as an intervenor in the lawsuit against the Interior Department alongside Wyoming, North Dakota and Colorado. ย The states’ lawsuit was consolidated with the WEA and IPAA lawsuit into a single case just two weeks later on Juneย 4.

In an interview with IOGCC communications director Carol Booth on the sidelines of the Columbus meeting, Booth told DeSmog that passed or proposed resolutions often result in things like thisย happening.ย 

โ€œThose usually start as the process for somewhere else we need to go,โ€ explained Booth. โ€œLynn Helms is taking that resolution to Senator Hoeven and Senator Hoeven will look at it and itโ€™s kind of us urging Congress [to do something] and we will write the bill or work with his staff to write a bill toย introduce.โ€

In this case, with the idea of state primacy legislation struck down by CRS, IOGCC and its industry backers got their back-up plan: a victory in federal court upholding the legal statusย quo.ย 

IOGCC Organizes BLM Ruleย Comments

IOGCC‘s push back against the BLM fracking rules, as it would happen, actually began the day after the initial rules were rolled out in March 2013. Baker wrote an email on March 17, 2013 to IOGCC‘s state representatives, saying he โ€œwould appreciate comments from anyoneโ€ on the then-proposedย rules.ย 

Utah and North Dakota, presumably on behalf of IOGCC, did proceed to write letters to BLM on the proposedย rules.

The Utah letter was written by former industry lobbyist and Utah Republican Governor Gary Herbert’s energy adviser Cody Stewart.ย Itย concludedย that the federal government should not encroach upon state regulatory authority as it pertains toย fracking on publicย lands.ย 

Stewart formerly worked as a lobbyist for the Independent Petroleum Association of the Mountains States (IPAMS), now known as WEA, the co-plaintiff inย the successfulย lawsuit.ย 

Image Credit:ย Regulations.gov

North Dakota’s letter, signed by Governor Jack Dalrymple andย Attorney Generalย Wayne Stenehjem as representatives of the Industrial Commission, came to a similar conclusion to the Utahย commenters.

โ€œThe NDIC believes the proposed rule is unnecessary in North Dakota since the NDIC has already promulgated effective regulations requiring chemical disclosure and environmental protection,โ€ they wrote.

โ€œThe BLM‘s analysis of costs and benefits does not take into consideration that many states, like North Dakota, already have similar requirements in their current rules that make the proposed revised rule duplicative and unnecessary. Since each sedimentary basin has unique deposits and geologic features which result in unique local environmental and geologic conditions regulating oil and gas development is a role best left to stateย regulation.โ€

Bernstein’s Mineralย Holdings

It turns out that Bernstein, an IOGCC legal and regulatory affairs committee member according to its 2015ย Directory, has a personal financial stake in oil and gas industry development. So too does his boss Johnย Hoeven.ย 

Financial disclosure forms reveal that Bernstein owns between $100,000-$1 million worth of oil and gas mineral rights through a company he incorporated in North Dakota called Hills and Prairie Properties LLC, according to his 2014 financial disclosure form. That grew from $10,000-$100,000 worth of stock, as listed in Bernsteinโ€™s 2013 financial disclosureย form.

Hoevenย also owns hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of oil and gas industry-related stock in companies such as Energy Transfer Partners, Linn Energy, Kinder Morgan and Honeywell International, plus hundreds of thousands more in oil-by-rail carriers CSX Corporation and Unionย Pacific.

In reaction to the BLM federal court ruling, Hoeven’s office issued a statement lauding the decision and mentioned royalties, though not his top aide’s royaltiesย investments.

โ€œStates have been managing hydraulic fracturing with good environmental stewardship for decades,โ€ Hoeven said. โ€œThis regulation would have duplicated these local efforts, adding layers of bureaucracy and threatening to increase costs for producers and consumers without added benefits. Further, by restricting and delaying development on public lands, this rule would have severely reduced royalties to federal and stateย government.โ€

IOGCC‘s Halliburtonย Loopholeย Cited

Both IPAA and its front group Energy In Depth weighed in on the court ruling, as did WEA.ย 

โ€œWe’re overjoyed with the ruling. The judge determined that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate fracking, period. He decided exclusively on statutory authority, so there’s nothing to remand, no do over,โ€ wrote WEA in its press release.

IPAA sang a similar tune in its pressย release.

โ€œThe Judge could not have been more clear when he ruled, โ€˜Congress has not directed the BLM to enact regulations governing hydraulic fracturing,โ€ reads the IPAA press release. โ€œIndeed, Congress has expressly removed federal agency authority to regulate the activity, making its intentย clear.โ€™โ€

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 โ€œHalliburton Loophole,โ€ cited by Judgeย Skavdahl, was also pushed toย the forefront by IOGCC as revealed by an InsideClimate News investigation. That loophole exempts the oil and gas industry from federal regulations of fracking, which is whatย Skavdahl pointed to in hisย ruling.ย 

BLM Fracking Rule IOGCC

Image Credit: U.S. District Court for the District ofย Wyoming

Food and Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter pointed to that bill in her statement denouncing theย decision.ย 

โ€œWe have Dick Cheney and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to thank for this ruling that federal agencies cannot implement regulations to protect us from fracking,โ€ stated Hauter. โ€œThis ruling indicates more starkly than ever the urgent need for Congress to undo the harmful policies enacted under that legislation and provide our agencies the power to what they were created to doโ€”protect our resources, our lands, and our communities fromย harm.โ€

But not only do we have Cheney and the company for which he formerly served as CEO, Halliburton, to thank. We also have IOGCC, the most powerful Congress-authorized oil and gas industry lobbying organ few have ever heardย of.ย 

The Obama Administration has not indicated whether it intends to appeal theย ruling.ย 

Photo Credit: WildEarth Guardians |ย Flickr

picture-7018-1583982147.png
Steve Horn is the owner of the consultancy Horn Communications & Research Services, which provides public relations, content writing, and investigative research work products to a wide range of nonprofit and for-profit clients across the world. He is an investigative reporter on the climate beat for over a decade and former Research Fellow for DeSmog.

Related Posts

on

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.
on

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.