Climate Denial Group Global Warming Policy Foundation Books Royal Society Venue for Matt Ridley Lecture

authordefault
on

This is a guestย post fromย ClimateDenierRoundupย crossposted from Dailyย Kos.

Last weekย we talked aboutย a group in the UK who tried, but ultimately failed, to use a respected institution as the venue for a denial conference in an effort to drum upย headlines.

Now the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is looking to try their luck at the same ploy โ€”ย booking space at the Royal Society for a lecture from Matt โ€œKing Coalโ€ย Ridley.

In aย statement published on New Scientist, the Royal Society defended its decision to rent out space to the GWPF.

The Society acknowledges that the science on climate is clear, says that it opposes efforts to misrepresent climate science, and has disagreed strongly with the GWPFย before.

But the Society apparently thinks the GWPF has now accepted reality and is merely interested in discussing policies to address the climate problem. At least thatโ€™s the impression given by their last sentence: โ€œIf the GWPF use this opportunity to misrepresent the scientific evidence it would undermine the legitimacy of their views on policy responses to climateย change.โ€

Except we already know there is no legitimacy to their views. The GWPFโ€™sย bias and blurring of fact and commentย is why they had to spin off a lobbying arm of their non-profit. The same day the New Scientist story was published, the campaign (not educational charity) arm of the GWPFย published a postย suggesting that thereโ€™s a 10 year โ€œpauseโ€ in Arctic sea ice melt, despite starting the post with a graph showing the clear decline in ice sinceย 1978.

This arctic ice โ€œpauseโ€ is obviously just natural variability, despite their claim that it might be a meaningful trend. This is ironic, given theirย claimsย that 2015โ€™s record heat was just a natural variability, and not indicative of a meaningfulย trend.

Well, maybe not ironic, so much as a demonstration of Lewandowskyโ€™sย White Queenย concept (discussed by Greg Laden too.)

Sadly, the Royal Society seems committed to allowing the GWPF to leech off of the august institutionโ€™s credibility. But perhaps the GWPF is so full of crap that the Royal Society can be convinced to give them the royalย flush.

Main image: Lord Matt Ridley. Credit: Flickr/IAB UK

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.
on

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.
on

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.
on

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.