Minister Claims UK Pushed for Stricter Diesel Rules When it Actually Tried to Weaken Them

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
on

The government is getting good at putting a spin on its air pollution plans (or lack of them) ahead of the Juneย 2017 general election.ย ย 

On Thursday, it told the high court it wanted to delay the publication of a new air quality strategy toย โ€œcomply with pre-election propriety rulesโ€. The court had previously ordered the government to release the report by Monday, after an earlierย plan was judged to have been insufficientlyย ambitious.

The request for the delay comes shortly after the transport minister, John Hayes, tried to persuade parliament that the UK was at the forefront of European efforts to improve air quality from diesel emissions โ€” when in fact the opposite appears to beย true.

In his response to a parliamentary question, Hayes said, โ€œthe UK has secured agreement at EU level to introduce more stringent real driving emissions testing for all new cars and vans across the EU from September 2017, ensuring that vehicle manufacturers live up to their low emissionย credentialsโ€.

While those rules are coming into force, itโ€™s despite the UKโ€™s best efforts rather than because ofย them.

The Guardian previously revealed how the UK had lobbied to allow nitrogen oxide emissions at twice the legal maximum until 2019, and for loopholes that would allow vehicles to emit at levels 40 percent above the European Commissionโ€™sย proposal.

Julia Poliscanova, air quality manager for think tank Transport and Environment, pointed to the UKโ€™s response to the European Commissionโ€™s original air quality proposal as evidence for it’s obstructive tendencies inย Europe.

She told DeSmog UK: โ€œTogether with France and Germany, the UK stitched up a deal on the new diesel nitrogen oxide tests that weakened the original Commission proposals and gave carmakers a flexibility of over 200 percent until 2020 and 50 percent continuouslyย thereafter.โ€

Seb Dance, Labour Member of the European Parliamentโ€™s environment, food and public health committee, told DeSmog UK:

โ€œThe UK government helped pushed through a dirty deal allowing manufacturers to bring to the market vehicles emitting more than double the amount of nitrogen oxides set by current standards. Throughout the negotiations for a new RDE test procedure the UK strongly opposed the more ambitious Commission proposal for conformity factors for nitrogen oxide limits and instead pushed for higher conformity factor values corresponding to weaker environmental objectives, giving a free pass to dirty dieselย cars.

โ€œNot only did the UK government push through watered down rules for polluting cars at the EU level, but they have yet again delayed publishing crucial measures to tackle illegal levels of nitrogen dioxide. The government can’t use their election plans to shirk responsibility on air pollution. Each day these urgent plans are delayed the more British lives will beย lost.โ€

Hayes did not respond to request forย comment.

Get Weekly News Updates

Main image credit: Riley Kaminer via Flickr CC BYย 2.0

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
Mat was DeSmog's Special Projects and Investigations Editor, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UKโ€™s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.
on

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.
on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?