FERC Approved NEXUS Pipeline After Companies Behind Project Lobbied for New Commissioners

picture-25839-1452298110.jpg
on

In one of their first major decisions on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), President Trumpโ€™s newly appointed commissioners Neil Chatterjee and Rob Powelson approved the controversial NEXUS natural gasย pipeline.

Yet DeSmog has found that in the months leading up to the appointment of the new commissioners, the companies behind the pipeline engaged in a lobbying blitz to support their nomination andย confirmation.

First nominated to FERC by the Trump administration in early May, Chatterjee and Powelson were eventually confirmed by the U.S. Senate on August 3. Their appointment restored a quorum at FERC, which โ€” having been reduced to a single commissioner in June this year โ€” was unable to approve new energyย projects.

Only three weeks after their appointment, the two joined sitting commissioner Cheryl LaFleur in approving the NEXUS pipeline, an interstate gas project that aims to deliver natural gas from Ohio to Michigan and Ontario, Canada. The companies behind the project are Canadaโ€™s Enbridge and Detroit-based DTE Energy. The pipeline was originally promoted by Spectra Energy, which Enbridge has sinceย purchased.

The Lobbyingย Campaign

Congressional lobbying records reviewed by DeSmog show that by last summer, both companies had paid at least three different lobbying entities to advocate for the approval of Trumpโ€™s new FERCย nominees.

Enbridge hired Prenda Groupโ€™s Brian Prenda and Brad Price, two longtime lobbyists for the company. DTE Energy employed three lobbyists from D.C. advocacy powerhouse Hogan Lovells: Michael Gilliland, Kyle Simpson, and Jamesย Wickett.

Hogan Lovellsโ€™ website touts Gillilandโ€™s extensive experience and success lobbying Congress and other government bodies. โ€œMike’s comprehensive knowledge of the annual federal budget process, the grants awarded by federal agencies, and the Congressional budget and appropriations process gives him an edge in helping clients to achieve their legislative, regulatory, and policy goals,โ€ the site proclaims. โ€œWorking closely with House and Senate committees and federal agency officials, he thoroughly understands the political process that governs federalย funding.

But the lobbying efforts did not stop there. NEXUS Gas Transmission, the limited liability corporation established by the companies behind the project to promote and build the pipeline, employed the services of veteran lobbyist Brian Hicks from the Columbus, Ohio-based Hicksย Partners.

Lobbying form
From congressional lobbying records, showing Brian Hicksโ€™ lobbying for FERCโ€™s nominees on behalf of NEXUS Gas Transmission LLC.

A source familiar with Enbridgeโ€™s lobbying efforts in the Senate told DeSmog that they included letter submissions in support of the nominees and personal meetings with members of Congress. Before reaching the Senate floor, the nominations first had to be approved by the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, chaired by Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).

Asked whether these efforts in fact helped advance the approval of NEXUS, the source said: โ€œIt was no secret that without a quorum, no projects could get approved. The company had various projects pending authorization so for them the lobbying was seen as necessary to help ensure a quorumโ€™s restored at FERC.โ€

Reached for comment, a spokesperson for the NEXUS pipeline referred DeSmog to its lobbyist, Brianย Hicks.ย 

In an email, Hicks acknowledged he contacted members of the Senate on the pipelineโ€™s behalf. โ€œAs a registered lobbyist, I urged members of the Senate to confirm nominations to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to restore the agencyโ€™sย quorum.โ€

DeSmog reached out to FERC for comment and asked whether the lobbying efforts played any role in the approval of the NEXUS pipeline. A FERC spokesperson responded simply withย โ€œno.โ€

Concerns Over Pipelineโ€™sย Impacts

As with numerous other fossil fuel pipeline projects in recent years, NEXUS had sparked fierce opposition from residents and activists affected by the project. As one central player in the fight, the Coalition to Reroute NEXUS (CORN) raised various objections to the 255-mile pipeline, which will cross 12 Ohioย counties.

Among their concern, opponents cited safety issues, increased air pollution from a planned compressor station, eminent domain land seizures, worsening climate change, and increases in frackingย activities.

After FERC approved the project in late August, some activists voiced deepย disappointment.

โ€œItโ€™s rigged,โ€ Paul Gierosky of York Township told a local newspaper. โ€œThere are new commissioners in there a couple weeks and they come to the conclusion that this pipeline, exporting natural gas to Canada, makesย sense?โ€

Others vowed to continue their opposition to the project. โ€œThey got the permit,โ€ said Kathie Jones of Sharon Township, โ€œBut itโ€™s not over yet. Weโ€™re going to keepย fighting.โ€

Main image: New FERC commissionersย Rob Powelson and Neil Chatterjee. Credit: FERC.gov

picture-25839-1452298110.jpg
Itai Vardi is a sociologist and freelance journalist. He lives and works in Boston,ย Massachusetts.

Related Posts

on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.
on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.