Opposition to Fracking Increases over Earthquake and Environmental Concerns

authordefault
on

By Ruth Hayhurst for Drill orย Drop

Opposition to fracking has risen to near record levels in the latest government public attitudes survey with a big increase in concern about earthquakes. Support for fracking fell to a joint recordย low.

Theย Wave tracker survey, conducted in December 2018, was the first to reflect reaction to fracking at Cuadrillaโ€™s shale gas site at Preston New Road. By the end of the survey period, operations at the site near Blackpool had induced 57 seismicย events.

A government-commissioned report, which likened some of the tremors to a bag of flour dropping on the floor and predated the survey, appears not to have reassuredย participants.

Yesterday,ย Cuadrillaย called for a review of the rules on fracking induced-earthquakes, arguing that it may not be commercially-viable to extract shale gas from Preston New Road within the currentย limits.

The latest survey, published this morning, also bucked the trend of previous years, which saw a rise in support for fracking and fall in opposition in theย winter.

Opposition

According to the latest results, 35 percentย of participants opposed fracking, up from 31% in September 2018. This is the highest level since the record of 36% in Septemberย 2017.

Strong opposition was 13 percent, up one percentage point on the previous survey but down from 16ย percent on the results from a yearย before.

As in previous surveys, the more people said they knew about fracking the more likely they were to oppose it. In the latest survey, of those who claimed to know a lot about fracking, 66% opposed and 20 percent supportedย it.

People most likely to oppose fracking included participants in social grade AB (42 percentcompared with 27 percentin social grade DE), home owners (39 percent compared with 29 percent/25 percent for private/social renders), people living in Scotland (50 percent), Wales (45 percent), and the north west (41 percent) and south west (40 percent) ofย England.

The main reasons why people opposed frackingย were:

  • Loss or destruction of natural environment (62 percent, up from 58ย percent)
  • Risk of earthquakes (40 percent, up from 26ย percent)
  • Risk of contamination to water supply (22 percent, down from 25ย %percent
  • Too much risk/uncertainty (20 percent, down from 25ย percent)
  • Not a safe process (24 percent, down from 27ย percent
  • Use of chemicals (unchanged at 15ย percent)

Support

Total support for fracking fell to 13 percent. This is the lowest level recorded in the survey so far, also reached in Septemberย 2017.

The latest figure was down from 15 percent in the previous survey in September 2018 and 16 percentfor the same time a yearย before.

Strong support for fracking remained unchanged at 2ย percent.

The gap between support and opposition has increased again. It is now one percentage point short of the record in Septemberย 2017.

According to the data, men were more likely to support fracking than women (18 percent compared with 9 percent). People aged 65 and over were also more likely to support (18 percent compared with 7 percent for 35-44 yearย olds).

The main reasons people gave for supporting frackingย were:

  • Need to use all available energy sources (34 percent, down from 34ย percent)
  • Reduces dependence on other fossil fuels (26 percent, up from 25ย percent)
  • Reduces dependence on other countries for UK energy (26 percent, up from 25ย percent)
  • May result in cheaper energy bills (21 percent, up from 17ย percent)
  • Positive impact on the UK economy (static at 19ย percent)

47 percent of participants neither supported nor opposed fracking. This was back down to a level in March 2018, following an increase to 50 percent in the previous survey. The main reason given was โ€œdonโ€™t know enough aboutย itโ€.

4 percent said they did not know whether they supported or opposed, unchanged on the previousย survey.

78 percent of participants were aware of fracking for shale gas. This is the same level as in July 2018 and up slightly from the previousย survey.

11 percent said they knew a lot about fracking (unchanged from the previous survey). 46 percent said they knew a little and 20 percent were aware. 22 percent said they had never heard of fracking, down from 25 percent in the previousย survey.

According to the findings, awareness of fracking was higher among participants aged 65 and over (89 percent, compared with 59 percent of 16 to 24 year olds), those in social grade AB (90 percent, compared with 66 percent in social grade DE), those with household incomes of ยฃ50,000 and over (88 percent, compared with 74 percent with household incomes under ยฃ16,000) and those living in Northern Ireland and the North West (88 percent and 87 percent respectively, compared with 59 percent of those living inย London).

Reaction

Daniel Carey-Dawes, Infrastructure Policy Manager at the Campaign to Protect Rural England,ย said:

โ€œThe Government has today met its obligation to protect our environment and the public, by refusing to entertain the desperate calls by industry for a relaxation of regulations on seismic activity as a result ofย fracking.

โ€œIt must now take this damning evidence that fracking does not have the support of the public into consideration as it makes its decision on proposals to fast-track fracking. Perusing this plan would defy local democracy and remove the voices of local communities in decisions over fracking proposals in theirย area.โ€

A spokesperson for Frack Free Lancashireย said:

โ€œThe increased opposition to fracking and drop in support comes as no surprise, considering the large number of seismic events which have been experienced since fracking resumed on the Fylde Coast. Frackingโ€™s unpopularity will also have been increased by peopleโ€™s distaste for the fracking companiesโ€™ bully boy tactics as they have tried to browbeat government into changing the regulations governing the seismic traffic lightย system.โ€

Steve Mason from Frack Freeย Unitedย said:

โ€œHow can shareholders or any sensible business keep on backing fracking? To continue forging ahead is beginning to look fanatical and totally irresponsible. Fracking is proving to be economically unviable, the industry cannot operate safely under the very same regulations they helpedย create.

โ€œFracking threatens industrial wipeout of some of the UKโ€™s most valuable countryside and has no public support. Itโ€™s time for a change of direction. Fracking in our communities is never going to be a strategic winner for thisย country.โ€

authordefault

Related Posts

on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.
on

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.
on

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.