Tory London Mayor Candidate Backed Fracking and Promoted Climate Science Denial

Susan Hallโ€™s views on climate change are โ€œextremely concerningโ€, critics say.
Adam Barnett - new white crop
on
Credit: PA Images / Alamy

Susan Hall, the Conservative Party candidate for London mayor, has opposed key climate policies, backed the reintroduction of fracking and promoted articles online which spread climate science denial, DeSmog can reveal.

She has been accused of trying to โ€œundermineโ€ climate science when the impact of human-caused climate change is making headlines amid a summer heatwave in Europe.

Hall, who is a London Assembly member and was selected as the Conservativesโ€™ London mayoral candidate last week, has vowed to reverse the expansion of the capitalโ€™s ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ) on her โ€œfirst dayโ€ in office and cancel all fines issued in the expanded zone. 

The Conservative Party has made opposing the ULEZ expansion a central part of its electoral strategy, deploying it in last weekโ€™s successful attempt to retain its Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat in west London. 

In a series of posts on Twitter, Hall has called for the UKโ€™s emissions-cutting net zero targets to be โ€œdelayedโ€ and for the lifting of the ban on fracking for shale gas. She has also promoted articles and comments that reject the role of human-made greenhouse gas emissions on climate change. 

The worldโ€™s leading body of climate scientists, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has warned about false and misleading information that โ€œundermines climate science and disregards risk and urgencyโ€ at a time when there is โ€œa brief and rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a liveable and sustainable future for allโ€. 

The Conservative government also faces a fresh lawsuit over its climate strategy, after its revised plan โ€“ published in March โ€“ admitted that it would fall short of meeting its emissions goals. 

Zoรซ Garbett, the Green Partyโ€™s candidate for Mayor of London told DeSmog: โ€œIt’s extremely concerning that the Conservatives have selected a mayoral candidate who is not only actively campaigning against cleaner air for Londoners but is also willing to try and undermine the climate science which clearly shows the impact humans have had.โ€

Garbett added that it was a sign of โ€œsheer desperationโ€ from the Conservative Party, which she claimed would rather โ€œpick culture fights than help to deliver the measures that would really make a difference for the millions of people living hereโ€.

A spokesperson for Hall told DeSmog that she supports net zero and the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change โ€“ backtracking on Hallโ€™s previous online statements. 

โ€˜The Green Agenda is Causing Havocโ€™

Susan Hall has called for the UKโ€™s net zero targets to be โ€œdelayedโ€ and has supported new fossil fuel extraction through the overturning of the UKโ€™s ban on fracking for shale gas. 

Fracking was banned in the UK in 2019 over concerns that it causes earth tremors. However, its reintroduction was the key demand of opponents of climate action as global gas prices spiked amid Russiaโ€™s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Prime Minister Liz Truss tried to lift the ban, but this was reversed by her successor Rishi Sunak. 

Last July, Hall shared a Daily Express article by Lord Frost, which argued that the UK should โ€œdrop [its] urgent dash to net zeroโ€ to avoid โ€œenergy rationingโ€ in the winter. Hall tweeted: โ€œThis man is full of common sense โ€“ net zero needs to be delayed and shale gas sought. Well said [David Frost]โ€. 

Four months later, during the COP27 climate summit, Frost joined the board of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), the UKโ€™s principal climate science denial group.

In June 2022, during the UKโ€™s record 40C heatwave, Hall shared an article on Twitter which dismissed the role of human-made greenhouse gas emissions on climate change. 

Hallโ€™s tweet urged the then Prime Minister Boris Johnson to โ€œreview the net zero agenda โ€“ especially now in times of financial hardshipโ€. 

She then directed readers to an article on the Daily Sceptic, a website run by climate science denier Toby Young, headlined: โ€œClimate Scientist Says Humans Cause Less Than 0.05C of Global Warming and Warns of โ€˜Anarchyโ€™ From โ€˜Delusionalโ€™ Net Zero Policies.โ€ 

It is an โ€œabsolute delusionโ€, the article suggested, โ€œthat humans can control the climate with their CO2 emissionsโ€. 

The IPCC has said the role of human-caused emissions on climate change is โ€œunequivocalโ€, and that human action can limit global warming. 

This is not the only time that Hall has promoted articles that have challenged the scientific consensus on climate change or downplayed the threat of the crisis. In a February 2020 tweet, Hall shared an article by the climate sceptic website Spiked Online which expressed doubt about the extent of climate change. 

Hall tweeted: โ€œCarbon neutral by 2030 promises [London Mayor Sadiq] Khan. Yet he canโ€™t even keep his promise of two million trees in his first term โ€“ he canโ€™t be trusted. I recommend this article โ€“ itโ€™s a good one.โ€ 

The Spiked article criticised Khanโ€™s green policies, claiming that his โ€œpledge to make London carbon-neutral ignores the issues that really matter to Londoners.โ€ It also made the false claim that โ€œthe jury is still out over the extent to which there actually is a โ€˜climate emergencyโ€™โ€.

Spiked regularly publishes articles that deny climate science, and has received funding from fossil fuel interests. As DeSmog has reported, between 2015 and 2018, the website received $300,000 from the Charles Koch Foundation, an arm of oil giant Koch Industries and a major funder of climate science denial.

In 2020, Hall criticised efforts to cut traffic and encourage cycling in London, tweeting: โ€œThe โ€˜greenโ€™ agenda is causing havoc in our city.โ€

ULEZ Fallout

These views contrast markedly with those of ordinary Londoners. Polling by London Councils in September 2022 showed that 94 percent of Londoners were aware of climate change and 84 percent were concerned about it. More in Common polling released last week also placed climate and the environment as the third most important issue among all UK voters, with concern at a six-month high.

A majority of Londoners also support the ULEZ in its current guise, while a large minority support its expansion to outer London (47 percent) โ€“ more than the 32 percent opposed.

A spokesperson for Susan Hall did not address her online posts when contacted by DeSmog. They said that Hall supports the UKโ€™s net zero target and does not disagree with the IPCC about human-caused global warming. 

The spokesperson also referred DeSmog to Hallโ€™s acceptance speech last week in which she said: โ€œ[We need] a cleaner city, that is serious about tackling climate change and air pollution, but without taxing the poorest.โ€

On air pollution, they said Hall would โ€œtake action to help specific areas in outer London where there are higher levels of air pollution, by setting up a ยฃ50 million hotspots fund which local authorities will be able to bid forโ€, adding: โ€œShe will set out more details on the rest of her environment plan in due course.โ€

Adam Barnett - new white crop
Adam Barnett is DeSmog's UK News Reporter. He is a former Staff Writer at Left Foot Forward and BBC Local Democracy Reporter.

Related Posts

on

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
on

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.
on

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.
on

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.