Echoing Climate Deniers, Washington Post Op-ed Imagines Electric Cars Stuck in Snow Instead of Gas Ones

In his recent column, Washington Post editorial writer Charles Lane entertained a debunked rightwing meme when he envisioned a recent traffic disaster worsened by snow outside D.C. with electric vehicles rather than gas-powered ones.
Opinion
picture-6706-1473698561.jpg
on

Originally published by ClimateDenierRoundup on Daily Kos.

No one wants to get stuck in traffic. Or in the snow. Getting stuck in an all-day traffic jam because it snowed, well, thatโ€™s pretty much the worst. And thatโ€™s exactly what happened in Virginia this week, when hundreds of drivers spent all day stuck on the highway after a severe snowstorm turned a jackknifed semi from a relatively routine highway occurrence to a major SNAFU.

Fortunately, everyone was okay. But imagine if they werenโ€™t! Wouldnโ€™t that have been terrible! Imagine if zombies had attacked while they were stranded, or if a horde of chuds emerged from the frozen sewers to convert everyone to Scientology, or, and this may be worst of all โ€ฆ

What if the cars stuck in the snow were all electric???

Everyone would surely be dead, or something!

At least thatโ€™s what the Washington Post editorial writer Charles Lane is scared of, judging by a column on Tuesday that turned a rightwing meme into his weekly column. โ€œImagine Virginiaโ€™s icy traffic catastrophe โ€“ but with only electric vehicles,” implores the headline, as though the issue here were a lack of access to electricity and not, you know, an overturned semi and snowfall that prevented emergency responders from doing their jobs.

The basis for his scary story? Aย trucker tweetedย that he gave someone โ€œdriving a Teslaโ€ some water and blankets. Apparently this anecdote โ€œillustrates an important point: If everyone had been driving electric vehicles, this mess could well have been worse.โ€

Except, of course, thatโ€™s not true at all. As both Reuters and Politifact pointed out last year when rightwing shitposters pushed the same scare story, EVs are fine when stuck in traffic jams because sitting there doesnโ€™t run down the battery. (And a reply to the trucker that Lane must have missed linked to a video showing a fully charged EV keeping warm for 70 hours at -3C.)

Idling your gas car does burn fuel though, something that even Lane acknowledged, writing that โ€œof course, cold also affects the performance of gas-powered vehicles; many were left stranded in Virginia after they ran out of fuel or their batteries died.โ€

Oh!

Nevertheless, Lane used the Tesla driver for his clever kicker complaining that EVs arenโ€™t already cheaper, easier and better than gas cars, saying that like that driver โ€œon I-95 in the wee hours of Tuesday morning, weโ€™re not there yet.โ€

Except the Tesla family probably drove off fine, but a bunch of people who didnโ€™t have electric vehicles were stuck,ย by Laneโ€™s own accounting!

Still though, apparently old cars have the advantage because itโ€™s easier to deliver gas to stranded motorists than charge an EV. But thatโ€™s only because gas is currently the norm! Can you imagine if the situation were reversed, and gas cars were replacing electric cars?

How would you possibly convince people that toting around gallons of liquid explosives is the safe and easy alternative to a battery or extension cord?

More realistically though, why is the Washington Post publishing this kind of nonsense? Do they really think that double-fact-checked memes are the sort of content deserving of their pages? Worse, are they aware that theyโ€™re offering the exact same sort of content as climate denial blogs?

Watts Up With Thatย ran a functionally identical postย asking readers to โ€œimagine you were stuck in an EV,โ€ and the professional industrial disinformation peddlers at CFACT, who also are just begging people to ignore that itโ€™s gas cars that got stuck and instead โ€œimagine electric vehicles in bad weather.โ€

And of course, for the coup de grace, you know youโ€™ve gotten something badly wrong when itโ€™s approvingly tweeted by Steve Milloy from his โ€œ@Junkscienceโ€ account, a handle that originates in his work for Big Tobacco to oppose regulations on smoking in the โ€˜90s.

Imagine adopting โ€œDemocracy dies in darknessโ€ as a motto, and then running opinions echoing those whoโ€™ve dedicated their lives to blowing smoke โ€“ literally.

Related Posts

on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.
on

The Climate Policy Institute attending the UN summit was founded by a state-backed think tank which has received fossil fuel funding.

The Climate Policy Institute attending the UN summit was founded by a state-backed think tank which has received fossil fuel funding.
on

With fracking CEO Wright tapped to serve in Trumpโ€™s cabinet, Lomborgโ€™s influence could extend into the highest levels of the U.S. government.

With fracking CEO Wright tapped to serve in Trumpโ€™s cabinet, Lomborgโ€™s influence could extend into the highest levels of the U.S. government.
Opinion
on

The international lending giant has pledged to double agriculture funding by 2030, but development banks are so far โ€œfailing spectacularlyโ€ to invest in sustainable solutions.

The international lending giant has pledged to double agriculture funding by 2030, but development banks are so far โ€œfailing spectacularlyโ€ to invest in sustainable solutions.