Kick Fossil Fuel Interests Out of Climate Policy Process, Campaigners Urge

Environmental groups are calling on world leaders to bring in tougher rules on fossil fuel companiesโ€™ access to policy-making processes.
R-headshot
on
A coalition of green groups have submitted a letter to decision-makers in Glasgow, calling for them to 'address the elephant in the room'. Image credit: Rich Collett-White.

World leaders must bring in stricter criteria to exclude fossil fuel companies from decision-making, campaigners have urged, as talks at the crucial COP26 summit enter their fifth day.

A broad coalition of 138 green groups submitted an open letter in Glasgow on Wednesday, calling for decision-makers to address the “elephant in the room holding back global climate ambition: the fossil fuel industry and its lobbying”.ย 

The letter calls on leaders including UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, COP26 President Alok Sharma and head of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Patricia Espinosa to revoke the sponsorship of two of the companies officially partnering the event – National Grid and Scottish energy provider SSE.ย 

It also urges the leaders at COP26 to agree on a new UN-backed treaty that would exclude fossil fuel companiesโ€™ involvement in climate policy making, following the example of the World Health Organisation-backed Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

โ€œFor decades the fossil fuel industry has been successfully delaying, weakening and sabotaging greater climate ambition, and as long as it continues to maintain its access to decision-makers and the policy-making process, then it will use that access to obstruct real climate action,” read the letter, whose signatories include Friends of the Earth, Fridays for Future and 350.org.

โ€œThe UNFCCC, the EU and UK should ensure climate decision-making is protected from fossil fuel interests at the regional, national and local level. In addition to closing the revolving door, this should involve ending private lobby meetings with the fossil fuel industry, excluding the industry from climate or trade delegations, and refusing to attend fossil fuel-sponsored events.โ€

Sponsorship

Earlier this year the UK government introduced stricter environmental criteria which has excluded major oil and gas firms such as Shell and BP from playing an official role at the conference. 

However, sponsors of the summit still include fossil fuel-reliant utility companies National Grid and SSE, which have both been criticised over the emissions they produce from their gas plants. And while oil and gas companies have been excluded from playing a formal part in proceedings, they have still been able to access the summit.

The signatories call on the UK and the UN to revoke the sponsorship of the two companies and demand representatives of the UK, European Union and UNFCCC โ€œrefuse to share platforms or attend fossil fuel sponsored eventsโ€ in and around the summit. 

Responding to the letterโ€™s concerns, a UK government spokesperson told DeSmog the government was working to encourage โ€œinnovation and commitment of everyone, including energy companies, as we move the global economy to net zero emissionsโ€.

โ€˜Corporate Captureโ€™

As well as calling for the โ€œrevolving doorโ€ between politicians and fossil fuel industry representatives to close, the letter also demands an end to private meetings between those parties at the local, regional and national level.

Analysis released by transparency and environmental groups last week revealed the phenomenon of the โ€œrevolving doorโ€ – where public officials go on to work for private companies, bringing potentially politically advantageous knowledge and contacts – was widespread among European fossil fuel companies. Dozens of EU officials and former officials had left or joined roles with industry giants including Shell and BP in the last six years, the research showed.

A separate analysis by DeSmog found that officials from the UKโ€™s Department of Business Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), the department responsible for the UKโ€™s energy and climate decision-making, had met with officials from fossil fuel and biomass companies nine times as often as clean energy producers between June 2019 and May 2021. This included at least one meeting with Sharma, the COP26 President.

The EU Commission and UNFCCC had not responded to a request for comment in time for publication.

R-headshot
Rachel is an investigative researcher and reporter based in Brussels. Her work has been covered by outlets including The Guardian, Vice News, The Financial Times and The Hill.

Related Posts

on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.
on

At McNeese State Universityโ€™s LNG center, โ€œwe want to ensure that our LNG industry has a major say in research direction,โ€ one of its project leaders wrote.

At McNeese State Universityโ€™s LNG center, โ€œwe want to ensure that our LNG industry has a major say in research direction,โ€ one of its project leaders wrote.