Belarus Chastised for Persecuting Environmental Defenders

In an unprecedented move, nations under the U.N. Aarhus Convention to protect environmental rights vote to suspend Belarusโ€™ rights under the treaty.
authordefault
on
Belarus Houses of Government. Credit: Dennis Jarvis. CC BY-SA 2.0

Belarus is to have its rights and privileges under a major international treaty suspended for persecuting environmental defenders and shutting down green NGOs.

A high-level summit of parties to Aarhus Convention on environmental rights on October 21, chastised the state for liquidating one of its oldest green NGOs and suppressing many other domestic environmental organisations.

The Aarhus Convention, established under the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, gives citizens of signatory nations the right to access environmental information, participate in environmental decision-making, and access justice in environmental matters.

Since it came into force in 2001, the treaty has been ratified by 47 parties including the UK, Norway, Kazakhstan, Belarus, all members of the European Union, and the EU itself. But this is the first time any member will have had its rights and privileges suspended.

The rights and privileges that could be suspended are things such as chairing the bureau or one of the taskforces. Belarus would still retain voting rights.

The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee has long expressed concern with Belarusโ€™ treatment of people and organisations involved in defending the environment, but the suspension was focused on the treatment of a particular NGO called Ecohome.

Founded in 1996 to promote environmentally friendly lifestyles and sustainable development, Ecohome was one of the oldest non-profit environmental organisations in Belarus. 

Over the summer, the Belarus ministry of justice accused Ecohome of interacting with unregistered organisations and not operating from a legally registered address. It had also sought but was denied information on the names and addresses of all Ecohome members. During the same period, the home of Ecohome director Marina Dubina was searched. 

Members of the NGO approached the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, which then warned Belarus to reconsider its treatment of the organisation and its staff. But Ecohome was formally liquidated by a court in August on the grounds that it had broken the law. 

In an October 2021 report, the compliance committee said there had been an โ€œegregiousโ€ lack of due process and the liquidation was โ€œneither reasonable nor proportionalโ€. 

It concluded that the treatment of Ecohome โ€œconstitutes a further incident of persecution, penalization and harassmentโ€ under the treaty and the โ€œsilencing by the party concerned of a communicant actively engaged in the committeeโ€™s follow-up procedure is a particularly flagrant case of non-complianceโ€.

Persecution of environmental defenders is a growing problem around the world. Belarus, where there has been a widespread crackdown on civil society since Alexander Lukashenko declared himself the winner of last yearโ€™s presidential election, is no exception. 

According to Belarussian law organisation Lawtrend and the OECD, 259 civil society organisations in Belarus are currently in the process of forced liquidation. The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee warned that the situation for people exercising their environmental rights in Belarus was now โ€œrapidly deterioratingโ€.

Unable to come to a consensus at the summit, parties to the Aarhus Convention took the unusual step of voting for a suspension, one of the toughest sanctions the treaty can apply. Just four member states opposed the idea โ€” Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Belarus โ€” while Moldova abstained. It will take effect from February, unless Belarus cancels the liquidation of Ecohome and reinstates its registration as a public association. 

Speaking at the summit, Belarussian environment minister Andrei Khudyk decried the decision as โ€œunfounded and politically motivatedโ€, and condemned the partiesโ€™ โ€œdiscriminatoryโ€ approach to Belarus.

Sergio Magonov of Ecohome told Desmog the conventionโ€™s response was โ€œadequateโ€ given Belarusโ€™ โ€œsystematic violationsโ€ of its provisions. โ€œThat’s not just about activistsโ€™ persecution and NGO Ecohome’s forced liquidation โ€” there are many other troubles in access to information, public participation and access to justice. Surely, persecution and harassment of activists are a crucial moment for such decisions?โ€

But he said the suspension does not guarantee restitution of the rights of Ecohome members, some of whom have been forced to leave the country while others fear arrest. โ€œIt would be much better if Belarus would recognise its noncompliance and take steps to getting the situation better.โ€ That would include reinstating Ecohome and other similar organisations.

Francesca Carlsson, senior legal officer for the European Environmental Bureau, regretted that no consensus could be found but said any other outcome would have been a โ€œslap in the faceโ€ for Ecohome, environmental defenders, and all those protected under the Aarhus Convention. 

At the summit, the parties also agreed a new rapid response mechanism to be able to address abuses of environmental defenders in a more timely fashion, which the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) plans to collaborate with.

UPDATE (10/21/2021): This article was updated to clarify the types of rights and privileges that could be suspended with the committee’s vote.

authordefault
Isabella Kaminski is a UK-based freelance journalist specialising in the environment and climate change.

Related Posts

on

Meet those aiming to capitalize on Trump's re-election by slashing climate action, from Koch network fixtures to Project 2025 and beyond.

Meet those aiming to capitalize on Trump's re-election by slashing climate action, from Koch network fixtures to Project 2025 and beyond.
on

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.
on

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.
on

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.