A draft climate change bill designed to put Ireland on a path to net zero emissions has been criticised by leading climate experts as โweakโ and full of โget-outย clausesโ.
The new bill was promised by coalition partner, the Green Party, as part of its pledge to deliver ambitious climate action within its first 100 days in office, with Taoiseach Micheรกl Martin describing it as โtrulyย ground-breakingโ.
But the reaction from climate advocates has been lukewarm. Maynooth University emeritus climatologist, Prof John Sweeney described the legislation as being full of โweasel words, loopholes and get-outย clausesโ.ย
Comparing the bill with the 2015 Act it is designed to strengthen, Prof Sweeney told a recent online seminar: โIโm looking at this new bill with a sense of deja-vu because I consider it contains a lot of the weaknesses of the previousย billโ.
Sweeney noted that the phrase โhave regard toโ appears 11 times in the new bill, while there are 43 instances of the term โmayโ. This, he argued, provides โready-made excusesโ for a future government or minister to delay or fudge strong climateย action.
Ireland remains among the highest per capita carbon emitters in the EU, with an average of 13 tonnes per person. In 2005, the EU set Ireland a 2020 target to achieve an overall 20 percent cut in emissions by 2020. However, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland has probably achieved no more than a one percent overall cut in the last 15ย years.
Lagging behind itsย neighbours
The preamble to the bill notes: โThe State shall pursue the transition to a climate resilient and climate neutral economy by the end of the year 2050โ. In an earlier draft circulated several months ago, this read: โThe State shall pursue and achieve theย transitionโ.
The removal of the requirement that the State actually succeed, rather than simply have an ambition to โpursueโ, has caused widespreadย concern.ย
Dr Andrew Jackson, an environmental lawyer at University College Dublin who was involved in the successful action taken by Climate Case Ireland to the Supreme Court earlier this year, told DeSmog: โWeโve got one shot at this, one real chance to revise the weak 2015 framework. We need to get the governance framework right. We owe that much to ourselves and ourย kidsโ.
Dr Jackson described the new bill as โvery weak compared to its international counterpartsโ, pointing to its lack of enforceable interim emissions targets. He added that it could โeasily be strengthenedโ and claimed that both the 2008 UK and 2009 Scottish climate legislation were more robust than what Ireland is proposing inย 2020.
Like what you’re reading? Support DeSmog by becoming a patron today!
Ireland is engaging in what he described as โsymbolic carbon budgeting, which is simply not meaningfulโ. In contrast, Scotland sets annual targets, and ministers are accountable to the parliament for delivering them. The country achieved a 50 percent emissions reduction between 1990 and 2020, driven by enforceableย legislation.ย
ย The UKโs 2008 Act states that it is โthe duty of the Secretary of State to ensure that the net UK carbon account for 2050 is at least 80 percent lower than the 1990 baselineโ, increased last year to โnet zeroโย emissions.ย
Irelandโs new draft bill, on the other hand, does not make the achievement of the 2050 decarbonisation target an explicit duty of either a minister or any future government, according to analysis carried out by Dr Sadhbh OโNeill on behalf of the NGO coalition group, Stop Climate Chaos.
The repeated use of the term โhave regard toโ critically undermines the bill, she added. โThis language must be strengthened to impose clear, unambiguous ex ante duties on the Minister and Government as is the case in the UK and Scotland Climate Changeย Acts.โ
Preferential treatment forย farming
Another major cause for concern is the special treatment given to the agricultural sector, which produces some 34 percent of Irelandโs total emissions and has been an influential opponent of climate action. The โspecial economic and social role of agricultureโ is noted in the bill, the only sector to receive such preferentialย treatment.
The agri-industry and elements of the farming press in Ireland have been engaged in an ongoing campaign to downplay the climate impacts of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas and by-product of ruminant agriculture, the dominant kind of farming inย Ireland.
In response to this lobbying effort, the bill notes โthe distinct characteristics of biogenic methaneโ, which the bill says is referred to in the IPCC special report published in October 2018. The report does not claim that biogenic or โentericโ methane is any less serious a problem for the climate than other forms of methane,ย however.
Speaking last week at the parliamentary committee on climate action, Dr Diarmuid Torney of Dublin City University noted that while the bill set out a clear procedure for setting five-yearly carbon budgets, there was โno clearly stated obligation on government to comply with these carbon budgets,โ unlike in the UK.ย
He added that there was nothing in the bill to prevent a future government from setting carbon budgets that are โexplicitly inconsistent with the 2050 objectiveโ. Dr Torney also cautioned that the wording of the bill may not actually cover all forms of greenhouseย gases.
Having been handed a painful defeat in the Supreme Court earlier this year, there is a suspicion in some quarters that much of the governmentโs work involved in drafting the current bill relates to preventing future legal challenges rather than achieving itsย objectives.ย
In his submission to the parliamentary committee, Jackson argued the bill had been โcrafted with a view to avoiding legal accountabilityโ. He added that โlitigation based on fundamental rights cannot be avoided by adopting a woolly climate lawย framework.โ
Photo credit: Houses of the Oireachtas from Ireland/Wikimedia/CC BYย 2.0
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts