Fossil Fuel Industry and Koch Network Fighting Pennsylvania's Move to Join Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

image_50427649
on

As Pennsylvania took a significant step this week towards joining a regional climate initiative to curb carbon pollution from power plants, newly revealed email records show how fossil fuel interests campaigned to oppose this initiative in a state that has the fifth most polluting electric power sector in theย nation.

The Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board, part of the stateโ€™s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), voted on September 15 to adopt draft regulations limiting carbon emissions from power plants as part of the stateโ€™s process of joining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a cap-and-invest program designed to slash emissions from the electric power sector. An ongoing battle has been brewing over Pennsylvania joining this program. Itsย Republican-controlled legislature is opposed to the state participating, while Democratic Governor Tom Wolf has taken executive action to start the process ofย joining.

โ€œAs the numerous hurricanes that have hit the Gulf Coast and devastating wildfires in the west have shown, climate change is not going to wait. When I signed the executive order last year it was because I knew it was time to tackle this problem, and RGGI is part of that solution,โ€ Gov. Wolf said in a statement Wednesday, September 16,ย applauding the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) advancing the draft rule to join RGGI.

According to the Pennsylvania DEP, the stateโ€™s participation in RGGI would result in an additional 30,000 jobs (in energy efficiency and clean energy) and would reduce carbon emissions by an estimated 188 million tons between 2022 and 2030. The Clean Air Council, a Pennsylvania-based environmental advocacy group, said the EQBโ€™s approval of the RGGI rule โ€œrepresents the most significant policy step to reduce Pennsylvaniaโ€™s greenhouse gas emissions in a longย time.โ€

But conservative elected officials in the state and the fossil fuel industry have a very different view of this regional climate initiative, which they claim will kill jobs and raise energy costs. Both the GOP-led House and Senate in the state recently passed bills that would prohibit Pennsylvania from joining RGGI, and legislative committees have held a series of anti-RGGI hearings featuring testimony from climate deniers.

Furthermore, emails obtained by the environmental watchdog group Energy and Policy Institute (EPI) through records requests and shared with DeSmog reveal a coordinated, behind-the-scenes effort to stop this climate policy in Pennsylvania coming from both out-of-state and in-state fossil fuel interests such as coal businesses, fossil fuel lobbying firms and advocacy coalitions, and Koch-networked groups like Americans for Prosperity (AFP).ย ย ย ย ย 

Together these interests broadly representing coal and petroleum producers are trying to prevent Pennsylvania from joining regional programs to curb carbon pollution like RGGI and the proposed Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI), a RGGI-style initiative addressing carbon emissions from the road transportationย sector.ย 

AFP Recruitedย Counties toย Opposeย Regional Climateย Initiatives

Emails reviewed by DeSmog show the Pennsylvania chapter of AFP met earlier this year with commissioners from Westmoreland County โ€” a county in western Pennsylvania just east of Pittsburgh โ€” to discuss a resolution opposing the state joining programs like RGGI and TCI.

The resolution, which misleadingly refers to the TCI program as a โ€œgas taxโ€ and RGGI as an โ€œelectricity tax,โ€ borrows language from a similar resolution opposing the TCI program in Rhode Island sent out by the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity, a right-wing group that is a member of the Koch-backed State Policy Network (SPN). AFPโ€™s State Director for Pennsylvania Ashley Sisca Klingensmith said in an email to Westmoreland County commissioners that she and an AFP energy policy analyst personally drafted the resolution opposing RGGI and TCI inย Pennsylvania.


Screen shot of email from Americans for Prosperity-PA to Westmoreland County Commissioners, February 26, 2020. Highlights by EPI.

Westmoreland County Commissioner Douglas Chew told DeSmog that the resolution never advanced beyond the initial discussion โ€œwith one person from AFP,โ€ which he said was held right before the county issued a state of emergency due to COVID-19. He added that he and Commissioner Sean Kertes would โ€œlikely have modified the resolution to suit our own opinionsย anyway.โ€

AFPโ€™s outreach extended beyond Westmoreland County with the Koch-funded group recruiting other Pennsylvania counties, like Somerset County, to try to pass the resolution. Email records reveal that AFPPA‘s Emily Greene tried to schedule a meeting with Somerset County Commissioner Colleen Dawson in March, a meeting that was then canceled due to the COVID-19 shutdown. Commissioner Dawson told DeSmog there were no follow up meetings or discussions with AFPPA on theย resolution.*ย ย 

AFP also appears to have coordinated with state Republican lawmakers to build opposition to RGGI in theย legislature.

One email from Klingensmith to Pennsylvania GOP lawmakers indicates that the Koch-networked opposition to RGGI and TCI is part of a โ€œnational coalitionโ€ with โ€œstakeholders from numerous northeastย states.โ€ย 


Screen shot of email from Americans for Prosperity-PA to Pennsylvania Republican legislators, March 10, 2020.ย Highlights by EPI.

โ€œIn short, this is part of a concerted Koch/SPN effort to undermine RGGI and TCI in New England and Pennsylvania,โ€ said Itai Vardi, a researcher with EPI who hasย reported for DeSmog in theย past.

Fossil Fuel Lobbyist Coordinated with Elected Officials to Drum up RGGIย Opposition

Other emails obtained by EPI show extensive coordination between a lobbyist representing fossil fuel interests and Pennsylvania elected officials opposing RGGI. The emails reveal a plan to โ€œfloodโ€ the Pennsylvania DEPโ€™s Citizen Advisory Council with opposition to RGGI, as coordinated by lobbyist Peter Gleason of the firm K&L Gates, which represents fossil fuel companies such as Cabot, Chesapeake, and Vistra. Gleason is representing Pennsylvania coal plant owner Olympus Power in the RGGI oppositionย campaign.


Screen shot of email from lobbyist Peter Gleason to several Republican legislators and the Pennsylvania Coal Alliance.ย Highlights by EPI.

One email went out on May 12 to several GOP lawmakers like Reps. James Struzzi and Donna Oberlander, both sponsors of anti-RGGI bill HB2025, as well as to the Pennsylvania Coal Alliance. Another email went out that day to a coalition called Power PA Jobs Alliance, an alliance of Pennsylvania business and fossil fuel interests opposed to regulatory climate action like the RGGIย program.

As Vardi told DeSmog, this coalition is coordinated through a D.C.-based network with further fossil fuel industry ties called the Business-Industry Political Action Committee (BIPAC). Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) President Barry Russell sits on BIPACโ€™s Board, for example. BIPAC has received funding in recent years from such fossil fuel industry players as the IPAA, Occidental Petroleum, Noble Energy, and Phillips 66. BIPAC hosts the website for Power PA Jobs Alliance, the primary in-state coalition fighting Pennsylvaniaโ€™s efforts to join RGGI. (Unidentifiedย critics posted a mirrored website at PowerPAJobs.org.)

State Moving Ahead with RGGIย Rule

Despite this extensive fossil fuel-powered opposition campaign, Pennsylvania is moving ahead with its plan to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and slash power-sector carbon pollution. The Pennsylvania Attorney General will next review the proposed regulation passed by the Environmental Quality Board, and the public will be able to weigh in through an official commentย period.

โ€œThis is an important step for Pennsylvaniaโ€™s efforts to combat climate change, which is already having and will continue to have a dramatic effect on Pennsylvania,โ€ DEP Secretary Patrick McDonnell said in a statement. โ€œThis is incredibly important and we are looking forward to hearing from the people of Pennsylvania about thisย effort.โ€

*Updated 9/18/20: This story originally stated that [Somerset County] Commissioner Dawson did not immediately respond to a DeSmog inquiry asking why she engaged with AFP on the group’s campaign to oppose RGGI. Dawson has since responded clarifying that county commissioners โ€œdid not engage with AFP on thisย issue.โ€ย 

Main image: Coal barge on the Allegheny River in Pittsburgh, January 12, 2008. Credit: Onasill ~ Bill, CC BYNCSAย 2.0

image_50427649
Dana is an environmental journalist focusing on climate change and climate accountability reporting. She writes regularly for DeSmog covering topics such as fossil fuel industry opposition to climate action, climate change lawsuits, greenwashing and false climate solutions, and clean transportation.

Related Posts

on

The projectโ€™s oil and gas backers say the project is a win for all Indigenous peoples. But neighboring First Nations disagree.

The projectโ€™s oil and gas backers say the project is a win for all Indigenous peoples. But neighboring First Nations disagree.
on

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
on

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.
on

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.